"Uncovering Southeast Asia's Jihad"
Dear (Anon),
HUMAN RIGHTS?
WHAT DO WE BELIEVE?
Your opinion of the following is appreciated. Do visit the web page and sign the guest book with your thoughts.
Hi guys,
So, anonymous, my response is, an unequivocal 'humanity forward' vote!
As for Jemaah Islamiya's plan's for Australian conquest?
Dear Anna Marie,
Hi Dave!
Ps: To the post above.
Is "Kingdom of God" already here?
Hi Ivan,
Dave!
Hi Ivan,
WHAT WOULD THE WORLD BE LIKE IF AL-QAEDA WINS?
GLOBALIZATION IS NOT POVERTY
To be a minority voice here:
Readers write in, in response to "Al-Qaeda wins?" from above:
Terrorism is a method. One used by the poor against their well-funded adversaries.
Hi S.R.
Hi Dave, S.R.,
JIMMY CARTER'S NOBEL PRIZE SPEECH
MERRY CHRISTMAS, SOLSTICE, AND NEW YEAR!
"New Year's Resolutions...?"
Above may be seen as a prayer to Allah titled 'Onward semi-skeptical, dualistic-monistical Christian Feminist Bodhisattva's!!'...
HUMANE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
IN HONOR OF DR. KING, JR: The determination to achieve excellence.
SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA
THE WORLD WANTS PEACE
Ivan,
Dear Monday,
Dear Ivan,
OUR GLOBAL VILLAGE
India and China agree over Tibet
SUICIDE BOMBERS VS FREEDOM OF CHOICE
The Allegory of the Wheel.
WORLD DOMINATION, OR CHANGE?
WHEN DOES SCIENCE BECOME RELIGION?
Thanks Herethink!
You will know good science is suspect when peer review of scientific papers becomes endorsements of status quo, when they whould be challenges.
RULES AND DISCIPLINE
MULTICULTURALISM
UBUNTU
SUFU & UNBUNTU
I told this to my dogs this morning: "he who barks first loses." This was in response to their barking at a neighbor's dog's barking, to keep them quiet. Doubtless they did not understand.
THE 'UNITED STATES' OF IRAQ
ARE WE THERE YET?
I am not the truth.
911 MEA CULPAS?
THE BRIDGE OF FREEDOM
A pro west secular democracy for Iraq is a pipe dream. The clerics have it.
EPIC ERA, THE END AND THE BEGINNING
Dear O:
Benjamin Baruch - Author of "The Day of the LORD is at Hand" claims he is not a prophet, but insists that he hears the audible voice of God - read these EXACT quotes of (Ben and God speaking) taken from the book...
Hi Anon,
PEACEFUL ISLAM: needs to be rediscovered again.
Diana Griego Erwin: Iraqi women try to help Americans see the country through their eyes
MARTYRS OF INNOCENCE, in Memoriam.
BRING THEM BACK FROM DEATH
Italian hostages released in Iraq
IS UN AT FAULT IN PREVENTING HUMAN TRAFFICKING?
NOBEL PRIZE FOR AFRICAN WOMAN
CHANGE IN THE ARAB/ISLAMIC WORLD?
An online war for hearts and minds
American Christians who hate Palestinian Christians
OPEN LETTER TO ALIENS IN OUR GALAXY.
Aliens won't talk to us continued, more really neat interesting stuff.
In searching for confirmation of a theory I had regarding multidimentional interaction with our reality and a quantum singularity at the heart of our sun I came upon this website.
OUR CULTURE must appear offensive to some other cultures. Just watch TV for a day or two, and you'll see how adolescently shallow is the content, if not merely sex innuendoes, then violence, or simplistic moral values of the kind suitable for children. Even our psychological explorations fall so far short of our greater human dignity and soul, more like focussing on a pimple than seeing the beauty of the whole face. Drugs and alcohol are a problem, but that is our problem. So if observers from afar who do not understand those finer qualities we also possess, our willingness to help others, our care for human rights and animal rights, though not yet universal, our love of freedom, our delight in the arts, and beauty of nature, though even here we squander this beauty in our eagerness to build home tracts or mine for resources, or cut forests; we can understand how they are misled. We are not perfect. But neither are we so horrible, that some should take it upon themselves to kill us for what are our values and beliefs. The greatest of these values is that we formally acknowledged human freedom and equality, if at times we are faulty in our intent's execution. We delight in our children, we love beauty, we love science and knowledge, we love God.
Very True Ivan,
To the children of Islam. In my youth I was to have died at the hands of Terrorists on PANAM 103 that was destroyed over Scottland. By the Grace of God I survived. I was next to have died as a result of a boquet of flowers laced with a weapon of war by the Terrorists. By the grace of God I survived. I was next to have died as a result of poison in my food delivered into my house by terorists. By the Grace of God I survived. Through all of it I remained faithful to my faith and remmembered the kindness of the Children of Islam to me. Both the children of the House of Christ and the Children of Islam have our terrorists. When pressed, I did not use my skills to kill but rather to break terrorist networks, nor did I allow my skill with a compass and straight-edge to be used as a weapon of war. In God's own time all those that abuse prisoners, maim and kill outside the law will face God and his justice. Of this I am sure. Until that day it is up to us to preserve the peace and advance knowledgel I hope one day to go to Mecca and see it with my own eyes as you are free to go to visit our holy sites. I also hope to drink one day from the Holy Zam Zam Spring where an Angel of God Tread in honor of Ibrahim from whom we are all descended.
BBC News reports: Iraq violence shifting Arab media , which shows Arab media becoming increasingly aware that the killings by their suicide bombers are increasingly targeting their own civilians.
G8 AND AFRICA
G8 on Africa's corruption pandemic?
PRIMITIVE INSANE TERRORISM
sdwc
CAN ISLAM EVOLVE?
Ivan,
Current Political Situation in Iraq
For those that bandy about the words, "Lets Nuke the Place" or "Lets Turn it into a parking lot." or "Just Kill them all and let God Sort Them out."
I have long thought that we are reaching a critical juncture in the war in Iraq and offer the following link that does a good job at addressing that issue.
FORWARD OR BACK IN IRAQ? For many Europeans, America is the fast-food industry. And the fast-food industry (along with the tobacco industry) is becoming increasingly implicated in Third World exploitation, robbing Third World people of their health rather than their wealth. Critics of the Bush administration's regime change project in Iraq argue that one can't force a democractic/representative government template on a society that is unprepared or unwilling to accept it.
UKRAINE'S ORANGE REVOLUTION, a year after.
As the votes in Iraq are counted the people of Islam have demonstrated that they have rejected the teachings of Osama and embraced the concept of democracy no matter how flawed the constitutional document they developed is.
Similar thoughts at the same time Ivan regarding our postings here.
Iraq awaits constitution results. As the votes in Iraq are counted the people of Islam have demonstrated that they have rejected the teachings of Osama and embraced the concept of democracy no matter how flawed the constitutional document they developed is.
One can only hope Ivan that Iraq does not go the way of Basra. I suspect that like I said it will be a long war of terror in Iraq before the nature of the change in Iraq that is now up for debate is resolved. I suspect it will be a long and bloody debate.
ISLAMIC JIHAD DISCONNECT? --on "pacifying" Islam.
Ivan,
Ed, let's not forget the Coptics who once were a great majority after the 7th century Islamic conquests, but now represent only about 5-10% of Egypt's population. See BBC News Three Killed in Egypt Church Riot, where the problems of Christians living in Islamic worlds is highlighted by this: Egyptian Pope Goes into Seclusion, and the Egyptian nun who a few days ago was stabbed by an Islamic young man. I know the Sufis, or the Bahai's, suffered similar barbaric fates. This extreme intolerance of other religions is a travesty for humankind in the 21st century, unimaginable but real. How do we solve this? Terrorism's crimes against humanity is but a minor part of a much bigger picture of hate, not the religion of Islam but those who practice hate within it. They are wrong. How to make it right? This will be the greatest challenge of the century.
You are right on that Ivan,
In recent news reports Chavez is claiming that Church Groups doing good work in Venezuela with the poor are agents of the CIA plotting a coup against him.
Ed, I think Chavez may become marginalized by this new BTC pipeline which will deliver oil from the Caspian region to the Mediterranean via Turkey and the Republic of Georgia. The pipeline flows at the rate of 1 million barrels per day, sweet light crude, from fields as large as Saudi Arabia's. It is also burried for its full length, grounds and vegetation restored to hide it, so makes it more difficult to blow up by the Islamic crazies, or anybody else. Chavez I am sure is well aware of this, and is probably sweating it. The first shipment to the West, mostly to Europe, should happen either by year end or first part of next year. Though US is very dependent on Chavez's oil, we can find replacement if need be.
I uderstand what you are saying Ivan,
Scooter Libby Update
What is 'right and just' Jihad? In one hadith [only one hadith!] Muhammad speaks of the greater vs. the lesser jihad, but most authorities consider it spurious and a forgery (3). And even if it were only a "lesser" jihad, military jihad would still be jihad and thus a duty and a virtue.
Alhazen's Billiard Problem.
Hi Ed, as I wrote on the Examined Life, Islam has a choice, to Reform, from within. Those who are complicit with Jihad, by being silent about its crimes against humanity, are guilty in the same way today's people of Germany cary a stain of shame for their silence during Nazism's rise. Islam can reform: get rid of Jihad. All else will follow. But this reform is really up to them.
I concur Ivan and with the latest posting of Dr. Pepper on the Exaimned Life Discussion Forum you understand the type of men and women that forced me to solve Alhazen's Billiard Problem at threat of poverty and lock out of the job market.
Cross post
Cross post
Cross-post A good point on the Fatwas Dr. Pepper.
Cross-Post For ANON who will likely go on and on about 9-11. If the intelligence services took the data I tipped them on regarding the Al Qeada Cell in Saudi Arabia and put it together with the Data from Team Able Danger along with the data from the female FBI agent that wrote the scathing memo about pre-9-11 FBI intelligence, 9-11 would likely have not happened.
Operation Autumn leaves
1988 was the beginning of the end for the Soviet empire and its dissolution was imminent. We watched and wondered if the military would launch a surprise attack against us, a short notice attack. The Germans said it was likely. It was the last days of the empire. The CIA under Reagan had done its job of sabotaging the Soviet economy and its collapse was imminent.
Ed, from what you write above, I should think
I would not go as far as to say that Ivan.
Rumors of 5th Intelligence officer on PANAM 103. As to the rumors of a 5th Intelligence officer on the plane. I was the fifth intelligence officer that was to be on the plane.
There were at least four U.S. intelligence officers on the passenger list, with rumors, never confirmed, of a fifth. The presence of these men on the flight later gave rise to a number of conspiracy theories, in which one or more of them were said to have been the bombers' targets. Matthew Gannon, the CIA's deputy station chief in Beirut, Lebanon, was sitting in Clipper Class, seat 14J. Major Chuck "Tiny" McKee [1] (http://web.syr.edu/~vpaf103/v_lackey.html), a 6 ft 5 in, 270 lb senior army officer on secondment to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in Beirut, sat behind Gannon in the center aisle in 15F. Two CIA officers, believed to be acting as bodyguards to Gannon and McKee, were sitting in economy: Ronald Lariviere, a security officer from the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, was in 20H, and Daniel O'Connor, a security officer from the U.S. Embassy in Nicosia, Cyprus, sat five rows behind Lariviere in 25H, both men seated over the right wing.
WIth developments in Iran the military capability of the terrorists may be increasing.
Thanks Ivan,
Vitaliy Fedorchuk was director of the KGB at the time of Lockerbie. He ordered the destruction of PANAM 103 using cut-outs. To him I was an annoyance to be dealt with. Then I trisected the angle and solved the Billiard problem and the KGB found out what they were playing against during the Cold War.
PS Now you know what Moscow Centre was capable of at the hieght of its power.
Indo/Pak Nuclear Crisis
State Department security breaches
Cultural diversity: is Paris burning? The immigrants' children and grandchildren are still stuck there - an angry underclass that is increasingly identified through religion. Ten years ago these youths were seen as French "Arabs". Now most are commonly referred to, and define themselves, as "Muslims". The government bans official statistics based on ethnicity or religion. As a result, no one knows exactly how many Muslims live in the country - at least five million is the best guess. All observers agree that jihadism does pose a direct threat to the country.
The rise of a bi-polar orientation in Islam.
Assessment of Tehran Linakge to Al Qeada in Africa and transfer of American Nuclear Secrets to Iran.
Al Qeada made the aquisition of Nuclear Technology a religious mandate. The ventalation worker at one of our nuclear plants followed the mandate and we now have suffered a major breach of nuclear security
Ed, thanks for this insight. Fascinating, exceptionally perceptive.
PS. I beleive the information on the Uranium purchase that is at the heart of the controversy of the blowing of the CIA agents cover was a deception operation false bit of disinformation put out their by Tehran, Iraq or AL Qeada to be used as it is now to split the United States.
Just how extensive is Al Qeada's netork?
AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS, France (Reuters) - With every night that France's rundown suburbs burn, officials grow increasingly convinced that drug traffickers and Islamist militants are using frustrated youths to challenge law and order here.
Re post
A social worker who also withheld his name said some rioters seemed linked to the drug trade because they "drive nice cars and use mobile telephones I couldn't afford to buy.
From the above referenced CNN link: "They can't say that, so they don't say anything," he added.
Assessment of Saudi Nuclear Capability
The question as to why would the Saudi's sign a deal for nuclear weapons in 2003.
Indian Parliment Attack 2001.
Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov
Nuclear Weapons Said For
Confirmed Taliban-Al Qeada-Paksitan link to Iran Nuclear Program.
Confirmation of Link to Al Qeada Saudi Arabia Nuclear Intelligence Aquisition Program.
On a side note this reconstruction of the intelligence collection aparatus built by Osama was built using the same techniques employed by Team Able Danger using unclassified data to rebuilt the frame work of the intelligence network of Osama, the Saudi's and Iran. It also relfects the Bi-Polar orientation in power developing in the Middle East between Tehran and Riyadh and what some of their primary intelligence collection priority are.
Vinnell Arabia and TRW link to Spying
See CNN.com/World: http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/10/29/asia.jihad.1/index.html
In the article by Maria Ressa:
"Jemaah Islamiya's plan is breathtaking -- to carve out one giant Islamic state from parts of Myanmar, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, the Phillipines, Indonesia and even Australia."
What does it mean? That we women will wear burkhas from Thailand to Australia? Like hell we will! How stupidly ignorant can they be? Can they cow and coerce us all into such submission, to give up centuries of civilization to become ignorant like them? What is the solution? Is it military or spiritual, or philosophical, or political, of what? Or is it all of the above? I think military and political comes first, then spiritual and philosophical, to bring them up to the present from their ignorant stygian past!
By Ivan A. on Friday, November 1, 2002 - 11:55 pm:
I hear you. It will not happen. Theirs is a desperate cause knowing that they and their old culture is being left permanently behind. But what are they losing? The fanatic fundamentalist can only offer bombs, suicide, terror, death, oppression, and burkhas (?sp). They have nothing to give, but fear and pain, and old fashioned tyranny. Sometimes, we of the new order of freedom need to be pushed to realize what wonderful treasures we really have. I suspect this is one of those times.
Have faith, Ivan
By Ivan A. on Thursday, November 7, 2002 - 09:58 pm:
The headline in BBC News reads "Iranian academic sentenced to death".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2415751.stm
This is the prime dilemma for all moderates, intellectuals, free thinkers, lovers of liberty, in the newly developing world of fundamentalist religious fanaticism, whether Muslim today, or Christian or Judaic in the future, or Atheist in the last of the Communist countries: No dissent of opinion is allowed. One is allowed the "freedom" only to obey. Is this not an oxymoron? Yet, freedom of speech, of thought, of being, is all undermined by men who would oppress one another in the name of God, another oxymoron. Peace only through suppression of being is the third oxymoron. Peace can only come from love of freedom and the tolerance to be who we are.
What will the future of humanity bring for Human Rights? I see this as a question that transcends all philosophical and religious thinking of the ages. Habeas Mentem is pivotal in how the future world will unfold, though it is still too new and obscure to make a difference. It is not "us against them" but rather "agreement against coercion". Which way will the world go?
Ivan
By Bruno on Saturday, November 16, 2002 - 03:51 am:
Why cannot we say:
"I am a believer in ALL religions, Christianity, Mohammedism, Baha'ism, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, Zoroastraism, Amenism, animism, spiritualism, Jainism, Taoism, all included. Each had a teacher for its time, and each had an eternal message for humankind. What we then make of it is a whole other story."
And why cannot we also say:
"And I even believe in Science!"
Surely the universe is big enough to accomodate all beliefs, so that we do not have to go killing each other over what another believes. What ever made us think we are unique? Or even alone? And what will they think of us when it is time to meet?
Bruno
================================================================
(Editors' note)
FOR ALL HUMANKIND
Then in believing in ALL the religions, does that not make us equal before God, as one ALL humankind? Each human being believes as it is in his or her heart and mind to believe, with the freedom allowed for all others to believe, even if only in science. Then, if so, we are ALL one family of humanity on this planet. The contentious arguments and conflicts now become passe. There are no infidels; there is no heresy; those are manmade things. All the religions of God are now equal for each and every human being alive, as is their free choice. Agreements can now replace coercions.
Is this not a better way?
Eds.
By Anonymous on Tuesday, November 26, 2002 - 04:22 pm:
We Are the Messiah!
Jesus said, “Be as I am.”
This will make a difference in the hearts and minds of many.
….
We are the Messiah, the Prophets, the Buddha, the Manifestations of God, the People of Spirit a living Messiah in the multitudes who can and do make a difference in Our Personal and World Spiritual Economies and Environments. Not one of us but all of us and We are all Messengers of God. We are all Messengers of God and We are all coe creaters of our Spiritual Environments and our Spiritual Economies and we are equally responsible for their state of well being.
Essentially we are all born Spiritual Whole/Holy beings requiring Loving, Caring, Respect, Accountability, Nurturing and encouragement to become whole productive participants in our families, our communities and even within ourselves feeling good about who we are and what we do helps us be there for others when they need us.
We are all co creators as with God. We must see we have choices and the ability to seek places we can make healthy choices, lets make the right choices. Educated and nurtured we can make good ones.
We are all born with Spiritual responsibilities to ourselves, others and God to do the right thing, get help when we need it, give it when we can and if we can’t be clear about it and empower the individual or ourselves to learn to help themselves or ourselves creatively and legally.
It means there are things that must be done and we have the means to do it, technology, education, resources, people willing and now we need the cooperation and coming together of our leaders, our people. Setting the problems on the table, finding effective solutions, implementing these with authority and educate the people the why’s if needed. You, Your Family and Our World need your help too.
It means Mankind must recognize the Nobility and the High Station of each of Us. In this recognition there must be a striving to edcucate, counsel and consult all Mankind to be the very best we can be regardless of rich or poor. Following this counsel will see the world blosoom before your eyes! One heart at a time!
Sharing this message will open doors before us all, we never imagined before.
Let me know what you think about this & your invited to visit my web site.
Or if you want to help with this project please contact me.
Anne Marie Habibi ph:1-902- 443-4347 or email me at amlhabibi@hotmail.com
My Web site http://www.geocities.com/amhabibi101/messiah.html
By davet84 on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 07:58 am:
Yes it's me again Ivan...back from my sojourns.
Well, we all agree that the reins of the education of the young boys in some of these countries needs to be taken away from the 'false prophets' they now have. That aligns with the Quran's message anyway, that these teachers cannot 'speak for God'.
Anyway, in relation to education, and what our wonderful children can offer. This post I put on the old archived 'non-contradiction' forum in response to Ivan's 'Examined' lament on Plato. Since it's archived I thought I'd better repost here...
Hi Ivan,
It's been a while...
Chin up old chum...
The good news is that I've got a local version of the 'free lunches for kids' program up and happening. I showed the people a copy of parts of this forum as my vision/prospectus.
We incorporated the community development officer from the local council. He had the great idea of taking the idea to kids in well off schools. They ran a brain storming session, and you should have seen the ideas rattling off those little minds!
What we came up with was a business/kids in well off schools/local government/meals on wheels joint venture to provide meals for kids in poorer city districts and aboriginal communities. It incorporates donations to CARE Australia's program for feeding kids in third world countries.
Thanks for your contributions, and Claude, WJ, and G-Man. I showed some of the kids (some) of the posts, and they have even developed an interest in Philosophy. They want Claude to come to Australia and lecture. The kids have created a petition to send to the United Nations based on Claude's ideas about all that world problem-solving in the near future, stopping military spending etc. They have also got local business looking at
Forum for the Future-UK and the ideas there.
Good work all!! Philosophy in action!!
Ivan, I think I can gurantee that sales in your book 'Dreams of the World Trilogy' will go through the roof...you are a legend!
By the way...what's it about? Maybe it could be included in the necessary education of Middle Eastern boys...
Dave.
By davet84 on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 08:00 am:
The problems we have had to surface in order to address them, so better sooner than later huh?
Dave.
By davet84 on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 08:36 am:
Well, Aussies have put their hands up to defend other countries against tyrants throughout the 20th century...if it comes to defending ourselves...well those little guys better think twice. Aussies have always been handy to have in the trenches, and its not a tradition that has died out. The little bullies ran for their lives when the diggers landed in East Timor. Ever ask yourself why they have to resort to the cheap shot of killing innocents who can't defend themselves? Basically...false bravado that quickly gives way to cowardice.
Besides the crocodiles will probably get them if they come from the North West.
The thing is all these crazies tend to come from countries that were 'missing in action' when WWII happened. They don't have the 'lessons from history' angle that we have. Perhaps they should have a look at some of the footage about how the Londoners withstood daily bombing for two years and still stuck it out...and then the landings of D Day. Do they really think they have what it takes?
They all need some lessons in what have been hard fought wins with the developments of democracies, defeating monarchical rule, separation of church and state, women's suffrage, the coming into being of the UN. You know all those principles that distinguish mammalian civilization from reptilian methods.
Sorry for the tirade...but my patience is a little short with these types since Bali.
I read somewhere that the only country in the world that comes close to being an Islamic state in the purer sense of the words is...the U.S. It has a constitution that declares itself 'one nation under God', plus truth and liberty. Ok so there's some greed happening, but we trust you to figure that out, right? And you might get around to signing the Rio protocol, and ratifying the World Court...that would be nice. And while we're on the topic...how about some decent movies!!
D.
By Ivan A. on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 12:35 pm:
So good to have a women's voice in spiritual matters, with a message of love and understanding, which is so often lost in a world of all men Prophets. Whether spiritual or secular, humanist or strictly religious, the message that always shines is that we are to love one another, for this is the God in us. Love without prejudice, without attachment, without demands, is the force of the All that Is radiating from within each one of us, which like a gravity of the soul attracts us to others, and them to us. That this love had been damaged so much through history, tortured, coerced, denied, killed, prostituted, is the damage that translates into each one of us in our dysfunctions in the present, the damaged who we are now. And so, we forget the primal message of Who we are, and you are reminding us. "We are the Messiahs!"
God's-Love-identity is in each one of us, and for this we should be truly awed and thankful. Indeed, same as my Baha'i friends remind me, we are all One Planet, One People. It is so good to hear a woman's voice to remind us of Love.
Thank you for your message.
Ivan
By Ivan A. on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 05:45 pm:
Happy Thanksgiving! from the upper-lower 50 to down-under! So glad to hear from you, and to see that you have been well occupied with good works for humanity. Also pleased to hear that our still young Humancafe "brain trust" is able to contribute something to other young minds as well.
"Dream of the Worlds", selling well, has quite a bit of our philosophies in there as well, though it is primarily a good yarn for the 22nd century, when we make Contact with our sister worlds. Of course, they are ahead of us and not quite as socially dysfunctional as here on Earth, but not entirely so. In fact, their dysfunctions are of a different order, if not dimensions!
About our totally dysfunctional brethren who would dominate the world with women all wearing burquas, men wearing lice infested beards, and children learning to shoot guns before they can walk... well, their false prophets of religious hatred have totally perverted their Prophet's teachings into something that resembles more like Satan worship than to God, or Allah. They somehow missed the message that Allah and God are Love and Merciful and Compassionate. Instead, theirs is a religion of hate, oppression, and killing, not Muslim at all. So it is too bad that they are such a pestilence, even if to some a generally popular pestilence, but like AIDS and other human diseases not be easily eradicated, it will not prevail. To fight this disease will be a world battle of wills, courage, intellect, and spiritual awareness that will take us well into the next century. Their best hope is to hold us back in our progress, since they themselves are feeling so hopelessly left behind, and cause us as much pain as they can. That is their satanic mission, to cause pain. Covert terror is easily inflicted on an open and generous hearted people, so they have their occasional successes. Of course, they will not take over Oz anymore than they will take over China. The teachers of the false prophets are merely an angry hive of helpless and incompetently confused human beings who in the end will only succeed in destroying themselves (like the "shoe bomber"), if they could even manage that. As you say, they are not warriors and do not have the mettle of Londoners during the blitz, nor the Allies on D day. But like the AIDS virus, these propagators of hate are a pestilence we cannot afford to ignore.
On a happier note, so glad to hear from you again!
Take care, love, Ivan
By Eds. on Friday, November 29, 2002 - 04:06 pm:
Note the final entry in the PeoplesBook2000, which said:
"War is, because those who need to change and cannot, do so by force to punish those who have, and become punished themselves, to change. This is true of all violence, until we change."
This is a very astute (anonymous) statement, and very telling, that those who cannot change, ie., the so-called "religious" fanatics, are forcing change on themselves by bringing violence to others (in a "jihad"), who had changed, so that in their defeat change will be forced back on them.
The "false prophets of hate" are doomed to change, because defeat is what they want, so they could change in a way they cannot do so on their own. This is most sad, a kind of "suicidal" defeat.
-Eds
By Ivan A. on Saturday, November 30, 2002 - 11:44 am:
Hi all, this was a thought that occurred to me while waking up this morning, that the sought after so-called Kingdom of God, of all the religions, has already been here all along! Think of all the religious efforts, all the priests and philosophers and worshipers, all thinking, praying, fighting, even killing, to bring this Kingdom to Earth. Would one not think that in the past two or three millennia that we had in fact succeeded?
I think we have, the Kingdom is already here. So what's wrong with this picture? If what we want is what we get, then we wanted what we got! As Anna Marie says, "We are the Messiah!", so we bring to Earth our kingdom, collectively as a human species. What I believe is missing from this kingdom of ours is "freedom". We have not yet understood how to do things through agreement rather than through coercion. Once we get this, freedom will exist, which will give us the right to be Who we are. Then, I suspect, the Kingdom envisioned through the ages by all religions will finally come to pass.
If this is so, then I'm ready for it!
Ivan
By davet84 on Saturday, November 30, 2002 - 03:41 pm:
This is actually a response to your last post on the TOE thread. Interestingly, we could say that at some point the TOE does become a question as to whether humanity will move forward or back with the knowledge that it (the TOE, or Thou) entails.
What you had written would seem to indicate that the whole TOE thread, and indeed all the calculations that are contained in it, and within all the hyperlinks that are referred to from it, and all the mathematics upon which it relies, could be summarised by saying simply 'thou art that' (see p.101 of the Book on the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are).
To quote you from a post that you entered in the thread 'Christ's Awakening the World' (see archives):
[quote]
This is the question I often ask myself as well: Is the infinite chain of connections that define a life, a point of life at the end of this chain: is this the soul? What is it that constitutes a definition of our being that is continuous, immortal, that is some value in us which survives us upon the death of our body? Does the concept of 'interrelationship' as a defining force of things in existence lend itself to a definition of the soul, and ultimately of God? Or does it require some higher consciousness in man to reach such an immortality, such as found in the life of the saints? I do not know, and can only offer a guess on this: I suspect the answer is 'yes'. Or in the words of the Buddhist masters: 'Thou art that.'
[unquote]
Interestingly, this post was made on July 25, 2001, as part of an exchange between you and our beloved WJ. Just a matter of weeks before that earth shattering event of stupidity, some two or three earth shattering events of stupidity ago. One wonders...perhaps we should consider these events not necessarily as a call to change our thinking, but a call to think more deeply along the lines that we had already been pursuing. It was a line of thought that would, if it were implemented, answer the complaints of the fundamentalists, but in an 'oh so much more peaceful and beneficial way'.
I'm quite often taken to thinking of a quote from Einstein (from his work 'Out of My Later Years') that 'all of Science is merely a refinement of everyday thinking'. Trouble is we have not sufficiently explored everyday thinking. And I guess meisois would have developed from some historical quasi-equivilent to this everyday thinking, though not a male-centred linguistic version of it as we see in humans, at least up until now.
It was only this morning that I typed in a title (in my potential book titles file, which now numbers around 3,000 potential book titles): "The History of Detailed Scrutiny that has Excluded Our Essential Nature'. But this was more in relation to the male focus that has ignored the 'other half of humanity' (not to mention the children) in its rush for knowledge that has lead to the profound ignorance that we see today. Indeed it's actually more than the other half of humanity when you think about. If you take in the enlightened males, the children, the elderly where males have lost the testosterone drive, the environmentalists, the clergy, then we are talking about something like 85% of humanity (the true everyday) being ignored.
And I think it has to be said that in the Islamic world, that profound ignorance has achieved what was always going to result from male-centred thinking, that is, a culture of stupid men. I don't think we need to go to the level of Salman Rushdie and use a term like 'Satanic Verses', and risk having a 'fatwah' placed on our heads. This because the Quran does encourage the pursuit of knowledge, but it should be a pursuit that doesn't result in the mere 'knowledge for knowledges sake' (narrow eros) that has resulted in the West. More along the lines of a necessarily 'beneficial knowledge', and which does address essential nature via appropriate scrutiny.
Perhaps you are on to something with your above quoted statement. The median point (interrelationship) between the West and the Middle East (A and Not A) might come from the East and the feminine (Good God, its the Goddess within). The reality of the principle of non-contradiction being the acceptance of contradiction, and doing something about it apart from arguing, warring, or demanding conflict resolution resources to be deployed from the non-arguers.
It was also Einstein who suggested that the minds that create problems might not be the best ones to be employed to solve the problems. Thus Yasser Arafat, should be excluded from this project, but Jimmy Carter most definitely on board.
There arises the prospect, for some more than others perhaps, that is summed up by the concluding paragraph from Edgar Allan Poe's 'Tales of Detection'.
[quote]
I believe there is nothing more to be explained. Mr. Pennifeather was released upon the spot, inherited the fortune of his uncle, profited by the lessons of experience, turned over a new leaf, and led happily ever afterward a new life.
[unquote]
Metta und Saludos Cordiales,
Dave.
By Ivan A. on Sunday, December 1, 2002 - 11:51 am:
Brilliant! Think infinitely. Think, an infinite interrelationship focussed on one spot, meiosis, and a cell divides. A new life! So now a cell separates into X and Y. Is this a starting point for ending a culture of "stupid men"?
Is this "meiosis" also the division between West and East, a world of knowledge for knowledge's sake and a world of knowledge for... what... God's sake? But is God only in the Holy Scriptures, the Gospels, Koran? Or is Allah, Yahweh, God, Infinite, Universe, Mind, also in all of Nature, All of existence? And if the latter, then the two new cells divided may find each other again in a greater vision of God, and thus interact without becoming another Abel and Cain.
How can we end a divisive culture of "stupid men" who, after all, were also raised and loved by women, their mothers? We will need wise women, and wise human beings of all ages.
Ivan
By davet84 on Sunday, December 1, 2002 - 04:07 pm:
Though the two cells divided, there is also the quite well thought out system of osmosis, I quite like that one too. Harnessing osmosis and the movement of thought through a semi-permeable meme-brain. Not to mention inter-cell communication of other sorts. Intercultural communication and interfaith might be other synonyms of those.
Is humanity itself a metaphor for life?
Bio-mimicry doesn't seem like such a bad idea, somewhat better than the idea of a military industrial complex supporting an eternally unstable peace.
Have you ever noticed that traffic systems act in similar ways to blood flow? The inward flow in the morning peak hour, and the outward flow at night time. Except that all red blood cells are four cylinder Japanese hatchbacks.
Dave.
By Eds. on Thursday, December 5, 2002 - 07:16 pm:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/842767.asp?Ocl=c1
The above article titled "Like a Virus", which compares terrorism by Al-Qaeda as a kind of illness, a kind of virus spreading throughout the globe, makes one think: What would happen if those who resent the cultures of the West were to win? What would the world be like if we of the West failed in combating this new wave of terrorism? This is a rhetorical question, since it is our belief that success by the terrorists over the West is not only unlikely but unthinkable. To have hundreds if not thousands of years of civilization and gains in human freedoms erased by a backwards reign of terror is not an option, one of which the West's leadership must be keenly aware to keep in tight focus. But what if it happened, that this focus was lost, and confusion instead lead to mistakes offering the terrorists victory? What would our world become?
Firstly, the whole idea of freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of exchange, freedom of information, freedom of travel, and many of our human rights would be erased in one stroke. There would no longer be the cherished "innocent until proven guilty", nor trial by jury, nor guarantees of agreement by contract, nor "the right to remain silent", nor dual or multi party democracy, nor the right to speak freely against one's government, nor to criticize those in power, nor the secular laws ensuring our right to being who we are. These all would be erased, as they individually and collectively represent a threat to a socio-cultural order based on unquestionable rule by power and allegiance; a rule by "divine" edict interpreted by the men who have empowered themselves to interpret for everyone what is their "word" of God. If their rule is challenged, they respond with a swift retaliation against any voice raised against them, if not a death "fatwa". So opposition becomes nonexistent and freedom as we know it, and had so long fought for, would be wiped out.
Secondly, prayer would become mandatory. This is not just any prayer but a very specific type of prayer as dictated by those in religious power. Children would be forced into mandatory schooling not for the sake of knowledge but for the sake of reinforcing such power. In effect, prayer loses its value as one's communion with God but becomes a slavish repetition which demands allegiance to the man-made interpretation of "Who-What" God is. The idea of searching one's conscience, our higher consciousness, for spiritual values would be outlawed and replaced with obedience. Children would be forcibly indoctrinated into this very narrow vision of what they may believe, which in effect becomes their spiritual boundaries, and which become punishable if overstepped. Freedom of religion, of what one believes, would cease to exist.
Thirdly, women could not dress as they pleased. This would start with forbidding the wearing of bathing suits on the beach, or even in one's home, or simply any exhibitionism would not be allowed. The freedom and beauty of being a woman would now be restricted to some men's idea of what a non-seductive woman should be. She should be plain and overly covered. Nudity would be strictly forbidden and severely punished (except perhaps in brothels), but not in the presence of strangers, or even other women. Indeed, women would be forced into hiding, forced to wear head to toe concealment of who they are while in public, and severely restricted as to their freedom of movement outside the home. The idea of a highly educated woman would be restricted severely, so the contributions women's minds could offer society would be nulled (other than as baby factories), and their intelligence would be outlawed into oblivion. Women would no longer be allowed to be women, but instead become some man-made image of what they should be, defined by men in power. These men would be they who rule as defined by their self interpreted vision of God's plan for humanity on Earth, God's "kingdom". In such a restrictive world, women are reduced to being citizens of a lower order devoid of human rights, except as decreed by men, their husbands or father or brothers, all of whom have the power to punish them with impunity, even unto death.
Fourthly, joy would be outlawed. Any expression of overt happiness would be viewed with suspicion. Music, the arts, dance, celebration of the beauty of being human, sculpture, painting, theatre, all celebrations of joy would be severely restricted if not outlawed, and punishable by decree. All past expressions of this beauty and joy, starting with the works of ancient Greeks, would have to be destroyed. Religious joy, a bliss of fervent prayer, would be allowed within parameters allowed as dictated by the religious teachers in power, but only as strictly interpreted by them. All spontaneous expressions of joy would be seen as an expression of moral corruption. Love would be seen as a fallen nature of men and women, so should be discouraged in favor of arranged marriages. Children would be allowed play and laughter while young, but discouraged upon maturity. The joy of sex would be most severely restricted. It would be allowed for procreation and to satisfy the natural needs of husbands. Sexual enjoyment by women would be eliminated as much as possible through female circumcision upon reaching menstruation, or other signs of sexual maturity such as the development of breasts. Intimidation would become a tool to be used against anyone who oversteps the rules of what may be considered joyful, as strictly defined by the religious leaders, and punished if disobeyed. To be in good taste, within this socio-cultural context, would be to be silent and obedient, or to show joy or loud lamentation (on command) when demanded.
Lastly, and the most damning of all to all who had enjoyed a life of freedom: The right to a pursuit of happiness would now be nulled, except as defined by the men who interpret for everyone the word of God. What one wants from life, who they are, how they are to achieve this, what gives them joy and pleasure and happiness of one's own initiative, reason, mind, heart, soul, all these become null and void, except as decreed. Each human being is now stripped of that innate initiative they may feel in their hearts in exchange for correct conduct, to conform to the strict interpretations from those whose elevated position of power had been decreed by God. Happiness is now as demanded by God, and any personal initiative comes under suspicion, thus in the process each human being, whether male or female, is emasculated into conformity. Freedom is irretrievably lost. We would not longer be allowed to be "who we are" (as per philosophy of Habeas Mentem). Whereas the loss of freedom impacted women and children first, this loss of freedom impacts productive men directly. Such loss of necessity forces them into a posture of a kind of machismo, a violent response to their emasculated loss of freedom, which leads to a lack of personal achievement except in violence to others. This violence is directed usually against those who are weaker than themselves, which is a form of cowardice. This is the abasing of men into eunuch like behavior towards each other, and especially in a resentment towards women. Though full of false bravado, they are impotent. Once personal freedom is taken away from men, they become powerless puppets in the hands of their oppressors within the tightly controlled environment of the socio-cultural power structure. His manhood gone, it is now defined instead by these constraints on his being, and his performance drops off into neglect, self destructiveness, and failure. The price paid is economic and social lethargy, except in warfare where he can exhibit his manhood in the killing of others, and the economy slides into impoverishment. This impoverishment is cumulative, except for those few who are in power over them, who live off their and their women's labor, and thus who rule for their own benefit at the expense of the populace they control. This is the Al-Qaeda world men would inherit if they win. Rather than rising to the Glory of God, they become men in a world of the emasculated damned.
Finally, how is this so different from slavery? The claim of a so-called "jihad" against the "imperial" forces of the West (that they enslave the lesser developed countries economically) is false. The real enslavement of human beings is when they are prevented from being who they are by their socio-cultural oppressors. Once that happens, economic stagnation sets in and, other than finding happiness covertly, through escapism, war, and excessive religious fervor, there is not cultural success, no future. God did not make man and woman to be slaves.
* * *
This is a grim image of two opposing civilizations faced off in a war without end. Will we go forwards or back as humanity? We at Humancafe do not favor war, ever. Yet, regrettably, while the Al-Qaeda and their sympathizers' threats exist, a war is inevitable. And thus we must be very clear on who we are and what it is we stand for, and what we want for our future and that of our children.
We are at crossroads testing our mettle as a civilization, as a free people faced with those who would enslave, and we cannot afford to lose our focus in what needs to be done. Strange that they who shout the loudest about their spiritual greatness, and would force it on others, are the ones who are the most oppressed, like a virus the most damned; while those who accept their spirituality meekly, silently and in a secular way, do so with good wishes and tolerance for others. Which will win? That will be in God's hands.
-Editors.
By Ivan A. on Saturday, December 7, 2002 - 02:37 pm:
Globalization does not cause poverty. Colonial imperialism is not globalization. The former is an international extension of commercial enterprise in association with independent nations; the latter is an extension of a dominant nation's home rule onto the native peoples under colonial occupation. They are materially and politically different from one another. Colonial exploitation was responsible for a status quo of native poverty. Globalization is not the cause of native poverty.
Every time we use a cell phone, or board an airplane, or use a credit card, or bank ATM to draw cash, or buy a product from another country, fruit out of season, automobiles with parts manufactured world wide; all these are globalization. If we stop using these services, or purchasing these goods, we impact the people of the countries where these goods and services are produced, to the detriment of their local economies. If goods from Japan, or China, or Germany or Mexico or Uganda, are purchased and sold worldwide, they are part of globalization. But if the wages paid in these countries are unequal, where in some economies the wages and commensurate standard of living is higher than in others, that is a function of local conditions more than of international commerce. If the local economy has predatory pricing, bureaucratic restrictions on capital formation or any enterprise except that most primitive, cultural and religious prohibitions on labor for sectors of the population, such as women or untouchables for example, or a power structure that either steals or taxes excessively from its people; these are what causes economic substandard performance and impoverishment. That these substandard economies are linked into an international network of commerce does not legitimize their domestic predation of economic capabilities, though it does tend to allow for these by continuing to do business with them. The moral choice is to stop doing business with abusive domestic economies, but then it is the people of these countries who suffer most, not the overall global economy, though the loss of goods and services would be felt world wide. If an economy fails, either in its agricultural output due to natural or manmade circumstances, such as drought or war, or the financial system collapses, such as a severe stock market crash or bank failures, or due to an aggressive criminal underground that rules the business establishment by terror and coercion, such as the Russian or Ukrainian or Italian Mafias; then all these economies suffer. This is not due to globalization but due to natural and manmade abuses that local conditions suffer. Poverty is caused by these.
To isolate a country because of human right abuses within its borders, or to cut off commerce for political reasons, such as the sanctions against Cuba or Iraq, are not functions of globalization, though such political and commercial isolation falls within the realm of world commerce. Political realities within nations may sanction them from the greater global reality of human activity, or become so insulated from the rest of the world that wages and economic activity may be severely impacted into substandard levels, and this could be interpreted as an act of globalization. However, isolation of economies does not further them, nor does it serve the commercial interests of a global human enterprise of trade, and must be seen within the context of being what they are, a locally isolated event. If a cell phone or credit card does not work in such an isolated country, then it is the failure of globalization there in that country that is to blame, not the globalization of the planet's total commerce. As free human beings, all are encouraged to participate as best they can in the interhuman exchange offered within the marketplace, if such is allowed to them. However, if the marketplace is dominated by criminal elements or government restrictions that prohibit activity, or excessive taxation, then if that market performs less well within the global network of markets, it is its people who suffer. They become impoverished.
So there is no comparison between old fashioned colonial imperialism and modern globalization. The culprit in today's poverty within pockets of the international human community is more often the result not of natural disasters, since world aid is quick to respond to these, but because of manmade conditions locally, either through war or other coercions of the domestic populations. This may even be extended to coercions by the people against themselves, where a meritocracy of excellence is envied and discouraged into an equality of mediocrity, such as was experienced within the Soviet Block countries in the past. To blame globalization on such poverty is to confuse issues and to obscure the real causes of such poverty. If the workers making running shoes in Vietnam are paid severely substandard wages, the correction of these abuses are within the realm of Vietnam. The global community may extend a helping hand, or criticize the internal abuses against the workers, but they may not step in and interfere with the political and economic reality of Vietnam without overstepping its bounds. That is for the people and government of Vietnam to correct. We, in our moral judgement, may be offended by such abuses of labor and may elect to not do business with such enterprises, but this will not alleviate the problem of substandard wages of labor there. Under colonialism, this would have been dealt with through orders from the home office, but under globalization this is no longer possible. We may not dictate to another nation how they are to run their affairs, unless they pose a military threat to us and others in the world. As we grow into being one planet through communications, travel, cultural exchange, and commerce, we must be painfully aware that the conditions in other countries not to our liking are not ours to solve, but theirs.
In conclusion, globalization is an extension of the marketplace worldwide. It offers but cannot control, and if it uses predatory pricing in an effort to control, then the solution falls into the domain of a world court to prevent such abuses. But as regards labor abuses or commercial abuses within nations, that is for the nations to resolve internally and not a responsibility of globalization. We can offer aid, but cannot dictate. To do otherwise is to trespass on the political and economic sovereignty of other nations, which is not the purpose nor intent of globalization. If any nation is guilty of severe human rights abuses, however, we have the right to call them on it and exert pressure for these abuses to cease. But this is not due to globalization but instead due to the abuses being offensive to humanity on a global scale. And then we have the right to protest against such abuses, because it is those abuses that cause poverty around the world.
To go forwards as a humanity and not back, we need not to protest against globalization, but to protest against the abuses of all people globally.
Ivan
By S.R. Prozak on Saturday, December 7, 2002 - 04:04 pm:
I think those who wish to live under Islam have a traditional society in which things are not seen as they are here in the west, and I do not judge. Are their women any more oppressed than women sexualized by advertising in the west? To my mind, no - the problem with societies is universal, whether peaceful or not: they deny the existential in favor of the end result.
By Humancafe on Sunday, December 8, 2002 - 11:46 am:
..."Once personal freedom is taken away from men, they become powerless puppets in the hands of their oppressors.... His manhood gone, it is now defined instead by these constraints on his being, and his performance drops off into neglect, self destructiveness, and failure. The price paid is economic and social lethargy, except in warfare where he can exhibit his manhood in the killing of others..."
Is this also the "Palestinian question"? --Marda
This is a war waged by enemies of individual thought against all forms of individualism. To the extent that it succeeds it will result in universal collectivism, probably collectivism's most virulent form: the integration of State and Religion. But is it possible to collectivize human consciousness? For that is the essence of their objective. It is not only women whose thoughts will be suppressed. Expression of any dissenting view will result in death. Total failure to dissent will result in a fate worse than death, that of perpetual slave status for almost all of mankind. This is a cultural war that cannot be won. It can only result in loss. Loss for its perpetrators and loss for its victims. Who was it, Cato or Cicero, who said at the end of each senate speech (no mattter what the subject) "Carthago delenda est"? I say, "terrorism delenda est." --Bill
Do you think
that terrorism exists to invade the west and to conquere it?
Where "terrorism" comes from?
Have we not a LOCAL terrorism, made of deviated people of our own culture,
land, and tradition?
What will happen, in sense of freedom and human rights, in the east, if the
free United States decide to bomb people there?
Where is the freedom and for who into a war?
Who decides who is allowed to be free?
I think to provoke a bit a reflection.
The good and the evil are NEVER totally divided.
A lot of slaughters happened in Italy too, expecially in the seventies.
Piazza Fontana, Piazza Bologna...
A lot of bombings happen all over the world and continuos attemps and
murders and so on.
It is nos still said that the answer is the war.
United States are not used to it and september the 11 was dreadful but
maybe the United States should understand what is happening inside its womb,
aswell.
Terrorism is not a country, is not a nation declaring war.
--Betta
By S.R. Prozak on Sunday, December 8, 2002 - 03:18 pm:
In war there is no legitimacy; stop yer whinin' ;)
By davet84 on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 - 04:17 pm:
That's an intriguing post. You're obviously one of those lucky folks who sees the whole picture and can sum it up in three sentences.
Yet the rest of the species has seen the need to have a U.N., whole university departments, research programs, military projects, senate investigation committees, talk back radio program continua, religious interfaith dialogues, etc dedicated to some aspect of each word that you have used in your three sentences.
I suppose, philosophically we could say the 'ought to stop whining' (is that stoicism?) has been derived from the premises 'terrorism as method', and 'no legitimacy in war'. In the (good)old days they used to argue that trying to derive an 'ought' from an 'is' commits a naturalistic fallacy (G.E. Moore). But in those days people were trying to establish beneficial 'oughts'. Besides, it seems to me that David Hume, in arguing that we can't get an ought from an is, was really arguing about the 'is' of theology. I personally believe that we can get an ought from an is, and its in relation to the ontological aspect of metaphysics, the mystical aspect of epistemology, and...well that's about as far as I've got...maybe aesthetics? But I do see something inherently political in the mystical. So maybe there's a mandala there (like a kind of Omega symbol) such that Church should indeed be separated from the State, but the spiritual/mystical should have a direct connection.
It seems that the ethical/moral side of philosophy was seen as trying to take over from the 'commandments of God' that came with religion, an age-old problem. In fact, some people are so reverent to the age-old problem itself, content aside, that they spend their whole lives researching it. If you looked like you were about to solve it, they might take a contract out on you because you are destroying their livliehood. I guess we should allow them to continue with their research...but isn't that a form of welfare?
Why should we accept the moral tenets of this person or that person, of this authority, or that authority? In a way religion was the easy solution. Some would say "...well I know someone that had a revelation from God himself, and this is what he said: 'thou shalt' etc, and if you don't abide, you'll get struck down by lightening or flood". Then when people got smart enough to say "gee, not only have I never had any inkling of God speaking to anyone, but nobody I speak to has either, except the Church leaders, funny that". An that's just ordinary untrained logic without having to question the existence or not of the Ark or the possibilities of all the animals on earth fitting on the Ark, or 'who was Cain's wife?'.
Who are the well-funded adversaries, by the way? In the poor communities it seems that the bomb builders have enough money to build the bombs. Doesn't that make them relatively well funded in relation to their poor neighbours? Shouldn't they spend their money on local education, clean water etc. Shouldn't they stop whining?
But on the whole, I guess what you say is true in the REALLY big picture sense. Coz in the REALLY big picture sense everyone has stopped their whining. Jesus has come back, everyone's a Bodhisatttva, and Paradise is here and now (there and then). That's somewhat different from 'stop ya whining and pass the ammunition'. So could it be that there are two dimensions to 'stop ya whining'?
Cheers, very thought provoking that one. I suppose you would align to the notion that humanity is always in stasis, i.e. neither forward nor back...huh?
Regards,
Dave.
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, December 11, 2002 - 09:22 pm:
Whinin' indeed, and thought provokin'. So "who was Cain's wife?" reminded me of "who was Adam's wife?" Was it Eve, as most assume, or really Lilith, the dark side of Eve (as most assume), or truly a different wife, the bad one? Who was the real wife in Adam's hareem?
I bring this up because though we may all be related, we may be related to the wrong side of Adam's hareem, figuring that all the good side got wiped out in the "million year war". Now we live with the continued legacy of Cain and Abel, which may go even further back to Eve and Lilith. At least, that's how it would look from the street where I live, which I'm sure is different from Main Street, or Wall Street, and surely even more different from Arab Street in the Abdeen quarter of Cairo. This Newsweek article gives us a glimpse into that Street: The Arab Street
"They can't understand why they are deprived of what they hope for, which is an American way of life."
This is the great irony of the Arab world, which I witnessed first hand when traveling in Egypt, that they yearn for an American way of life. The Street stretching from Kuwait city to Casablanca is the heartbeat of discontent with the West, while at the same time coveting the material wealth it offers. This is the root of the frustration of a culture left behind by the world, and an incendiary bomb waiting to go off. Also from the boys of the Abdeen, on the Street:
"Some people go too deep into Islam and end up believing things according to very strict values that I do not think are the real ones," says Haysam. "God did not tell us to kill innocents. Atta might have thought that our brothers in Palestine and Iraq and Afghanistan needed help, but what he did is not jihad for Islam."
Obviously this Abdeen Street boy was not descended from Lilith, and came from the good side of Eve, though the previous tenant of this same tenement apartment surely was. His name was Muhammad Atta... we know the rest.
Un-whinin', 'cause there is hope.
Ivan
By Ivan A. on Saturday, December 14, 2002 - 02:45 pm:
…"I am not here as a public official, but as a citizen of a troubled world who finds hope in a growing consensus that the generally accepted goals of society are peace, freedom, human rights, environmental quality, the alleviation of suffering, and the rule of law.
"I am convinced that Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and others can embrace each other in a common effort to alleviate human suffering and espouse peace."
Every once in a while, a politician rises to the level of world statesman, and I think Jimmy is one of these. He says further:
"The bond of our common humanity is stronger than the divisiveness of our fears and prejudices.
God gives us the capacity for choice. We can choose to alleviate suffering. We can choose to work together for peace. We can make these changes -- and we must."
Go Jimmy! It is great to see consciously enlightened human beings recognized publicly by the world.
Ivan
By Ivan/Anthony on Wednesday, December 25, 2002 - 01:07 pm:
This is to wish you a Celebratory Solstice, a most Felicitous Holiday
Season, and a Happy and Prosperous New Year, beyond your most optimistic
anticipations.
Anthony
Greetings at this Holiday Season, and Best Wishes for the Following Year,
whatever you Celebrate, be it
Brumalia, Christmas, Eid, Festive Season, Hanukkah, Holiday, 'Id Al-Fitr
Incwala, Kulig, Kwanzaa, Lohri, Maidhyairya, Makar Sankranti, Maunajaiyaras,
Misa de Aguinaldo, Pongal, Sakya Pandita Kunga Gyaltsen, Saturnalia, Simbang
Gabi, Sunreturn, Ta Chiu, Tohji-Taisai, Up-Helly-Aa, Winter Solstice, Yule,
Zartosht No-Diso, or any other festival,
in whatever language you celebrate it, be it in
Acholi, as "Mot ki Yomcwing Botwo Me Mwaka Manyen"; in Adhola, as "Wafayo
Chamo Mbaga & Bothi Oro Manyeni"; in Aeka, as "Keremisi jai be"; in
Afrikaans, as "Geseknde Kersfees en 'n gelukkige nuwe jaar"; in Ahtna, as
"C'ehwggelnen Dzaen"; in Albanian, as "Gëzuar Krishlindjet Vitin e Ri!"; in
Aleut, as "Kamgan Ukudigaa"; in Alsatian, as "E gueti Wïnâchte & E
glecklichs Nej Johr!"; in Alur, as "Wafoyo Kado Oro & Wafoyo Tundo Oro
manyeni"; in Alutiiq, as "Spraasnikam & Amlertut Kiaget!"; in Amharic, as
"Melkam Yelidet Beaal"; in Amuesha, as "Yomprocha' ya' nataya"; in Angami,
as "U kenei Christmas mu teicie kes a-u sie teicie kesa-u sie niepete keluo
shuzaie we"; in Apache (Western), as "Gozhqq Keshmish"; in Apalachicola, as
"Nettv-Cako-Rakko"; in Arabic, as "I'd Miilad Said ous Sana Saida"; in
Aragonese, as "Nabidà! & Goyosa Añada benién"; in Aramaic- Edo bri'cho o
rish d'shato brich'to!"; in Aramaic, as "Edo bri'cho o rish d'shato
brich'to!"; in Aranés, as "Bon Nadau!"; in Arawak, as "Aba satho niw jari
da'wisida bon"; in Argentinian, as "Feliz Navidad y Feliz Año Nuevo"; in
Armenian, as "Shenoraavor Nor Dari yev Pari Gaghand"; in Armenian, as
"Shenoraavor Nor Dari yev Soorp Janunt"; in Aromanian, as "Crãciunu hãriosu
shi unu anu nãu, bunu!"; in Assamese, as "Rongaali Bihur xubhessaa lobo"; in
Assyrian, as "Iedookon Breka"; in Asturian, as "Bones Navidaes & Gayoleru
anu nuevu!"; in Ata, as "Maroyan na Pasko woy kaopia-an ng Bag-ong Tuig
kaniyo't langon mga sulod"; in Aukan, as "Wi e winsi i wan bun nyun yali";
in Aymara, as "Sooma Nawira-ra"; in Azeri, as "Tezze Iliniz Yahsi Olsun"; in
Bafut, as "Mboni Chrismen & Mboni Alooyefee"; in Bahasa/Malaysia, as
"Selamat Hari Natal dan Tahun Baru"; in Bamoun, as "Poket Kristmet & Poket
lum mfe"; in Bandang, as "Mbung Mbung Krismie & Mbung Mbung Ngouh Suiie"; in
Banen, as "Enganda ye hiono mes & Hion Hios Hes"; in Basque, as "Zorionak
eta Urte Berri On Euskal Herritik!"; in Bassa, as "Ngand Nwi Lam & Mwi Lam";
in Batak Karo, as "Mejuah-juah Ketuahen Natal"; in Belgian, as "Zalige
Kertfeest"; in Belorussian, as "Winshuyu sa Svyatkami i z Novym godam!"; in
Bemba, as "Kristu abe nenu muli ino nshiku nkulu ya Mwezi"; in Bengali, as
"Shuvo Baro Din, Shuvo Nabo Barsho"; in Bermuda, as "Marry Crissmuss you
'byes an' hava happy new yurr, see?"; in Bhojpuri, as "Naya Sal Mubarak Ho";
in Bicolano, as "Maugmang Capascuhan asin Masaganang Ba-gong Taon!"; in
Bislama, as "Mi wisim yufala eerywan one gutfala Krismas & mo wan hapi New
Year long"; in Blaan, as "Pye duh di kaut Kristo klu munt ug Felemi Fali!";
in Blackfoot, as "I'Taamomohkatoyiiksistsikomi"; in Bohemian, as "Vesele
Vanoce"; in Bohemian/Czech, as "Prejeme Vam Vesele Vanoce a Stastny novy
rok"; in Brahui, as "Arkas caik xuda are"; in Brazilian Portugese, as
"Feliz Natal e Próspero Ano Novo"; in Brazilian, as "Boas Festas e Feliz Ano
Novo"; in Breton, as "Nedeleg laouen na bloav ezh mat"; in Bulgarian, as
"Vesela Koleda i chestita nova godina!"; in Bulu, as "Duma e bo'o"; in Bura,
as "e be Zambe e Usa ma ka Kirisimassu"; in Cantonese, as "Sing Dan Fae Lok.
Gung Hai Fat Choi"; in Carib, as "Sirito kypoton ra'a"; in Carolinian, as
"Ameseighil ubwutiiwel Layi Luugh me raagh fee"; in Carrier, as "Zoo dungwel
& Soocho nohdzi doghel"; in Catalan, as "Bon Nadal i Feliç Any Nou!"; in
Cebuano, as "Malipayong Pasko ug Bulahang Bag-ong Tuig!"; in Chaha , as
"Bogem h n mh m & Boxem as nana-h m"; in Chamba, as "Wi na ge nyare Su dome
Kirismass"; in Chamorro, as "Filis Pasgua & Filis Anu Nuebo"; in Cherokee,
as "Danistayohihv & Aliheli'sdi Itse Udetiyvsadisv"; in Cheyenne, as
"Hoesenestotse & Aa'e Emona'e"; in Chichewa, as "Moni Wa Chikondwelero Cha
Kristmasi"; in Chiga, as "Mwebare khuhika, Ha Noel"; in Choctaw, as "Yukpa,
Nitak Hollo Chito"; in Cornish, as "Nadelik looan na looan blethen noweth";
in Corsican, as "Bon Natale e Bon capu d' annu"; in Crazanian, as "Rot Yikji
Dol La Roo"; in Cree, as "Mitho Makosi Kesikansi"; in Creek, as "Afvcke
Nettvcakorakko"; in Creole/Seychelles, as "Bonn e Erez Ane"; in Croatian, as
"Stretan Bozic i Sretna Nova Godina"; in Czech, as "Prejeme Vam Vesele
Vanoce a stastny Novy Rok"; in Dagbani, as "Ni ti Burunya Chou & Mi ti yuun";
in Damara/Nama, as "Khiza"; in Danish, as "Glædelig Jul og godt nytår"; in
Dibabawon, as "Marayaw na Pasko aw Bag-ong Tui g kaniyo tibo na mga soon";
in Dine/Navajo, as "Ya'at'eeh Keshmish"; in Dinka, as "Miet puou yan dhiedh
Banyda tene Yin"; in Divehi, as "Ufaaveri aa ahareh"; in Dschang , as
"Chrismi a lekah Nguo Suieh"; in Duri, as "Christmas-e- Shoma Mobarak nuwe
jaar"; in Dutch, as "Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar"; in
Egyptian, as "Colo sana wintom tiebeen"; in English, as "Merry Christmas and
a Happy New Year"; in Eritrean, as "Rehus-Beal-Ledeat"; in Esperanto, as
"Felican Kristnaskon kaj Bonan Novjaron!"; in Estonian, as "Rõõmsaid
Jõulupühi ja Head uut aastat"; in Euskera, as "Zorionak eta Urte Berri On
Faeroese, Gledhilig jól og eydnurikt n?ggjár!"; in Éwé, as "Blunya na wo";
in Ewondo, as "Mbemde abog abyali nti! Mbembe Mbu!"; in Faeroese, as
"Gledhilig jol og eydnurikt nyggjar!"; in Fali, as "Use d'h Krismass"; in
Farsi, as "Cristmas-e-shoma mobarak bashad"; in Fijian, as "Me Nomuni na
marau ni siga ni sucu dei na yabaki vou"; in Finnish, as "Hyvää Joulua ja
Onnellista Uutta Vuotta"; in Flemish, as "Zalig Kerstfeest en Gelukkig nieuw
jaar"; in French, as "Joyeux Noel et Bonne Année!"; in Friesian, as "Noflike
Krystdagen en in protte Lok en Seine yn it Nije Jier!"; in Friulian, as "Bon
Nadâl e Bon An Gnûf"; in Fulfulde, as "Jabbama be salla Kirismati"; in
Gaddang, as "Mangamgam Bawa a dawun sikua diaw amin"; in Gaelic (Irish), as
"Nollaig faoi shean agus faoi shonas duit agus bliain nua faoi mhaise
dhuit!"; in Gaelic (Scottish), as "Nollaig chridheil agus Bliadhna mhath
ur!"; in Galician, as "Bon Nadal e Bo Ani Novo"; in Gari, as "!Soalokia God
i gotu vasau, mi lao ke ba na rago vanigira ara dou i matana!"; in Gciriku,
as "Mfiyawidi yaKrisimisa & Marago ghaMwaka waUpe"; in Georgian, as
"Gilotsavt Krist'es Shobas & Gilosavt akhal ts'els"; in German, as
"Froehliche Weihnachten und ein gluckliches Neues Jahr!"; in Gikuyu, as "Gia
na Thigukuu njega Na MwakaM weru wi Gikeno"; in Gitskan, as "Hisgusgitxwsim
Ha'niisgats Christ gankl Ama Sii K'uuhl!"; in Golin, as "Yesu kule nongwa
kaun umaribe ongwa ena mone di mile wai wen milo"; in Greek, as "Kala
Christougenna Ki'eftihismenos O Kenourios Chronos"; in Greenlandic, as
"Juullimi Ukiortaassamilu Pilluarit"; in Guahibo, as "Pexania
Navidadmatacabi piginia pexaniapejanawai paxainaename"; in Guambiano, as
"Navidadwan Tabig tugagunrrigay & Sru pilawan kasrag utunrrigay"; in
Guarani, as "Avyaitete ahi ko Tupa ray arape qyrai Yy Kapyryin rira"; in
Guarayu, as "Imboeteipri tasecoi Tupa i vave! & Ivve ava Tupa rembiaisu
toyuvirecoi turpi oyeaisusa pipe!"; in Gujarati, as "Natal ni shub kaamnao &
Saal Mubarak"; in Gwere , as "Osusuku Omusa & Masuke Omwaka"; in Gwich'in,
as "Drin tsal zhit shoh ohlii & Drin Choo zhit zhoh ohlii"; in Han, as "Drin
tsul zhit sho ahlay & Drin Cho zhit sho ahlay"; in Hausa, as "Barka da
Kirsimatikuma Barka da Sabuwar Shekara!"; in Hawaian, as "Mele Kalikimaka
ame Hauoli Makahiki Hou!"; in Haya, as "Waihuka na Noeli & Waihhuka n
Omwaka"; in Hebrew, as "Mo'adim Lesimkha. Shanah Tova"; in Heiban, as "Ati
kalo gathje uwa gigih"; in Herero, as "Okresmesa ombwa Ombura ombe ombwa";
in Hiligaynon, as "Malipayon nga paskua & Malipayon Nga Bag-ong tuig"; in
Hindi, as "Shubh Naya Baras"; in Hmong, as "Myob zoo Huub yug ye xus zoo
siab xyoo ntsiab."; in Holo, as "Seng-tan khoai-lok! "; in Hungarian, as
"Kellemes Karacsonyiunnepeket & Boldog Új Évet"; in Hungduan, as "Maphon au
nitungawan. Apo Dios Kituwen baron di toon"; in Iban, as "Selamat Ari
Krismas enggau Taun Baru"; in Icelandic, as "Gledileg Jól og Farsaelt
Komandi ár!"; in Igbo, as "Ekelere m gi maka Keresimesi na ubochi izizi afo
ozo"; in Ikiribati, as "Te Mauri, Te Raoi ao Te Tabomoa nakoimi nte Kirimati
ao te Ririki ae Bou"; in Ilocano, as "Naimbag a Pascua ken Naragsac nga Baro
nga Tawen!"; in Imbongu, as "Gotenga malo Jisasi Karaist"; in Indonesian, as
"Selamat Hari Natal dan Selamat Tahun Baru!"; in Inupiaq, as "Quvianagli
Anaiyyuniqpaliqsi suli Nakuuluni Ukiutqiutiqsi"; in Inupik, as "Jutdlime
pivdluarit ukiortame pivdluaritlo!"; in Iraqi, as "Idah Saidan Wa Sanah
Jadidah"; in Iroquois, as "Ojenyunyat Sungwiyadeson homungradon nagwutut &
Ojenyunyat osrasay"; in Italian, as "Buon Natale e Felice Anno Nuovo"; in
Japanese, as "Shinnen omedeto. Kurisumasu Omedeto gozaimasu"; in Javanese,
as "Sugeng Natal lan warsa enggal"; in Jèrriais, as "Bouan Noué et Bouanne
Année"; in Kabyle, as "Assegwas ameggaz"; in Kadazan, as "Kotobian Tadau Do
Krimas om Toun Vagu"; in Kahua, as "Na vagevageha surireua na Kirisimasi ma
na harisi naoru"; in Kala Lagaw Ya, as "Ngi ngayka Koei trimal Kaz"; in
Kamba, as "Ithiwa na Kisimsi Kiseo & Na Mwaka Mweu Museo"; in Kambaata, as
"eman haaro wegga illisholce"; in Kannada, as "Hosa Varushada Subhasayagalu";
in Kaqchiquel, as "Dios tik'ujie' avik'in"; in Karelian, as "Rastawanke
Sinun, Uvven Vuvenke Sinun"; in Kashmiri, as "Christmas Id Mubarak"; in
Kawalib, as "Amirnar Krismas Gi"; in Khasi, as "Krismas basuk & Snem thymmai
basuk"; in Kinyarwanda, as "Umunsi Mwiza"; in Kirundi, as "Noeli Nziza &
Umwaka Mwiza"; in Kom, as "Isangle Krismen & Isangle beng i fue"; in
Konkoni, as "Khushal borit Natalam"; in Korafe, as "Keremisi ewewa"; in
Korean, as "Sung Tan Chuk Ha"; in Kosraean, as "Tok Tapeng & Engan ya sasu";
in Koyukon, as "Denaahto' Hoolaank Dedzaanh Sodeelts'eeyh"; in Krio, as
"Appi Krismes en Appi Niu Yaa"; in Kuanua, as "A Bona Lukara na Kinakava";
in Kurdish, as "Seva piroz sahibe u sersala te piroz be"; in Kutchin, as
"Drin Tsal Neenjit Goozu'"; in Kwangali, as "Kerekemisa zongwa & Erago
moMumvho gomupe"; in Kyrghyz, as "JangI jIlIngIz guttuu bolsun!"; in Ladin,
as "Bon Nadel y Bon Ann Nuef"; in Lakota, as "Wanikiya tonpi wowiyuskin &
Omaka teca oiyokipi"; in Lamnsó, as "Kisheri ke Kisimen & Vijung ve kiya
kefiyki"; in Lango, as "Afoyo Chamo Mwake & Apoyo Mwaka Manyeni"; in Lappic,
as "Buorit Juovllat ja Buorre Oddajahki"; in Latin, as "Natale hilare et
Annum Faustum!"; in Latvian, as "Prieci'gus Ziemsve'tkus un Laimi'gu Jauno
Gadu!+"; in Lausitzian, as "Wjesole hody a strowe nowe leto"; in Lebanese,
as "Milad Saeed wa Sanaa Mubarakah"; in Lithuanian, as "Linksmu Kaledu ir
laimingu Nauju metu"; in Livian, as "Riiemlizi Talspividi ja pagin vonno
udaigastos"; in Livonian, as "Jovi talshpivdi un Vondzist uto aigasto"; in
Lower Tanana, as "Bet'oxdilt'ayi bedena' ch'exulanhde dranh ninoxudedhet";
in Lozi, as "Kilisimasi ya nyakalalo & Silimo se sinca sa tabo"; in Luganda,
as "Amazalibwa Agesanyu & N'Omwaka Omujaa Ogwemirembe "; in Luhya, as
"Isuguku Indahi & Nu Muhiga Musha"; in Luo, as "Sikuku Mar Higa Kod Mor &
Mar Kiga Manyien"; in Luritja, as "Wai! Nyuntu Larya?"; in Luxembourgeois,
as "Schéi Krëschtdeeg an e Schéint Néi Joer"; in Macedonian, as "Srekan
Bozik I Nova Godina"; in Madura, as "Pada salamet sabhala bengko areja"; in
Makassar, as "Salama' Natal & Selamat Tahun baru"; in Malagasy, as "Arahaba
tratry ny Krismasy"; in Malayalam, as "Puthuvalsara Aashamsakal"; in
Malaysian, as "Selamat Hari Krismas and Selamat Tahun Baru"; in Maltese, as
"Nixtieqlek Milied Tajjeb u Sena Tajba"; in Mambwe, as "Kristu aye namwe umu
nsikunkulu ino iya Mwezi"; in Mandarin, as "Kung His Hsin Nien bing Chu Shen
Tan"; in Mandarin, as "Shen Dan Kuai Le Xin Nian Yu Kuai"; in Mandobo, as
"Mepiya Pagasaulog sa pagka-otawni Jesus aw maontong kaling Omay!"; in
Mangyan, as "Mayad paq Pasko kag"; in Mansaka, as "Madyaw na Pasko aw
malipayong Bag-ong Tuig kamayo, mga lumon"; in Manx, as "Nollick ghennal as
blein vie noa"; in Maori, as "Kia orana e kia manuia rava i teia Kiritimeti
e te Mataiti Ou"; in Marathi, as "Shub Naya Varsh"; in Margi, as "Use aga
Kirismassi"; in Marshallese, as "Monono ilo raaneoan Nejin & Jeramman ilo
iio in ekaal"; in Mataco-Mataguayo, as "Lesilatyaj ihi Dios ta i ppule ye,
Letamsek ihi wichi ta Dios ikojejthi ta i honat e"; in Maya/Yucateco, as
"Utzul mank'inal"; in Medlpa, as "Enim Mutuiyo!"; in Meithei, as "Krismas
Hlomum & Kumthar Lawmum"; in Metis/Michif , as "Gayayr Nwel"; in Mingrelian,
as "k'irses mugoxuamant & axal ts'anas mugoxuamant"; in Monégasque, as
"Festusu Natale e Bona ana noeva"; in Mongolian, as "Zul saryn bolon shine
ony mend devshuulye"; in Monogasque, as "Festusu Natale e Bona ana noeva";
in Moro, as "Nidli pred naborete nano"; in Moru, as "Medu amiri ovuru Yesu
opi amaro"; in Muyu, as "Lip Ki amun aa Natal Kowe"; in Naasioi, as "Tampara
Kirisimaasi"; in Naskapi, as "miywaaitaakun mikusaanor & kiyaa
maamiyupiyaakw minuwaach pipuun"; in Navajo, as "Merry Keshmish"; in Ndjem,
as "Mbeya mbeya Ebiel & Mbeya mbeya mbu"; in Ndogo, as "Esimano olyaKalunga
gwokombandambanda! & Nombili kombanda yevi maantu e ya hokwa!"; in Ndonga,
as "Okrismesa iwa & Omude Mupe wa Punikwa"; in Nepali, as "krist Yesu Ko
Shuva Janma Utsav Ko Upalaxhma Hardik Shuva & Naya Barsa Ko harkik
Shuvakamana"; in Newari, as "Nhu Da Ya Vintuna"; in Nii, as "Nim Ono"; in
Niuean, as "Monuina a Aho Kilisimasi mo e Tau Foou"; in Norweigan/Bokmål, as
"Glaedelig (or) God Jul og Godt Nyttår"; in Norweigan/Nynorsk, as "Eg
ynskjer hermed Dykk alle ein God Jul og Godt Nyttår"; in Notu/Ewage, as
"Keremisi dave be"; in Nyanja, as "Kristu akhale ndi inu munyengo ino ya
Christmas"; in Nyankore , as "Mukhulukhe Omwaka"; in Occitan, as "Polit
nadal e bona annada"; in Ojibwe (Chippewa), as "Niibaa' anami'egiizhigad &
Aabita Biboon"; in Oneida, as "Wanto'wan amp; Hoyan"; in Oriya, as
"Sukhamaya christmass ebang khusibhara naba barsa"; in Orokaiva, as
"Keremisi javotoho"; in Oromo, as "baga wagaa hara isinin gaye"; in Palauan,
as "Ungil Kurismas"; in Pangasinan, as "Maabig ya pasko & Maliket ya balon
taon"; in Papiamento (Aruba), as "Bon Pasco y un Feliz Año Nobo"; in Papua
New Guinea, as "Bikpela hamamas blong dispela Krismas na Nupela yia i go
long yu"; in Pashto, as "De Christmas akhtar de bakhtawar au newai kal de
mubarak sha."; in Pennsylvania German, as "En frehlicher Grischtdaag unen
hallich Nei Yaahr!"; in Philippines, as "Maligayang Pasko at Manigong Bagong
Taon!"; in Pohnpeian, as "Peren en Krismas & Peren en Parakapw"; in Polish,
as "Wesolych Swiat i Szczesliwego Nowego Roku."; in Pompangan, as "Malugud
Pascu at saca Masayang Bayung Banua!"; in Portuguese, as "Boas Festas e um
feliz Ano Novo"; in Puerto Rican, as "Muy Feliz Navidad y un Prospero Ano
Nuevo!"; in Punjabi, as "Nave sal di mubaraka"; in Q'anjob'al, as "chi woche
swatx'ilal hak'ul yet yalji Komami'"; in Quechua, as "Sumaj kausay kachun
Navidad ch'sisipi & Mosoi Watapi sumaj kausay kachun"; in Quiche', as "Dioa
kkje' awuk'"; in Raeto-Ramance, as "Bella Festas da zNadal ed in Ventiravel
Onn Nov"; in Rapa-Nui, as "Mata-Ki-Te-Rangi & Te-Pito-O-Te-Henua"; in
Rarotongan, as "Kia akakakaia te Atua i runga i te rangi Teitei, e ei au to
to teianei ao, e kia aroaia mai te tangata nei."; in Rengma, as "Anu keghi
Christmas nu amapi kethighi wa salam pi nthu chupenle"; in Retvara , as
"Mamaka wejejerãka"; in Rhetian, as "Bellas festas da nadal e bun onn"; in
Rheto-Romance, as "Bella Festas daz Nadal ed in Ventiravel Onn Nov"; in
Romanche(Sursilvan), as "Legreivlas fiastas da Nadal e bien niev onn!"; in
Romani (Gypsy), as "Bachtalo krecunu Thaj Bachtalo Nevo Bers"; in Romanian,
as "Craciun fericit si un An Nou fericit!"; in Rongmei, as "Mei kathui nata
neila mei Khrisrmas akhatni gai mei tingkum kathan tu-na arew we"; in
Roviana, as "Mami tataru Kirisimasi koa gamu doduru meke qetu qetu vuaheni
vaqura ia"; in Rumanian, as "Hristos s-a Nascut si Anul Nou Fericit"; in
Russian, as "Pozdrevlyayu s prazdnikom Rozhdestva i s Novim Godom"; in
Saamia, as "Muwule Omwaka Enjaya"; in Salar, as "YangI yilingiz gotlI
bulsIn!"; in Salcha, as "Dzeen chox teedle 'aay nayilkaa"; in Sambal, as
"Maligayang Pasko at Masayang Ba-yon Taon!"; in Sámi, as "Buorit Juovllat ja
Buorre Oddajahki"; in Samoan, as "La manuia le Kilisimasi ma le tausaga fou";
in Sango, as "Gloire na Nzapa na ndouzou aho kouè, Na siriri na ndo sessé
na popo ti ajo so amou nguia na Lo."; in Santali, as "Raska nawa Serma"; in
Saramaccan, as "Nuan wan suti jai o!"; in Sardian, as "Felize Nadale e Bonu
Cabuannu"; in Sardinian, as "Bonu nadale e prosperu annu nou"; in Saxon
(Low), as "Heughliche Winachten un 'n moi Nijaar"; in Secoya , as "Sihuanu'u
Ejaerepa aide'ose'ere & Sihuana'u huaje ametecahue"; in Semandang, as
"Selemat gawai Natal"; in Seneca, as "a:o'-e:sad yos-ha:-se:'"; in Serbian,
as " Sretan Bozic. Vesela Nova Godine"; in Sicilian, as "Bon Natali e
Prosperu Annu Novu !"; in Singhalese, as "Subha nath thalak Vewa. Subha
Aluth Awrudhak Vewa"; in Slavey, as "Teyatie Gonezu"; in Slovakian, as
"Vesele Vianoce a stastny novy rok"; in Slovene, as "Vesele bozicne praznike
in srecno novo leto"; in Soga, as "Mwisuka Sekukulu"; in Somali, as "ciid
wanaagsan iyo sanad cusub oo fiican."; in Songe, as "Kutandika kua Yesu
kuibuwa! & Kipua kipia kibuwa!"; in Sorani, as "Newroz le to Piroz be"; in
Sorbian, as "Wjesole hody a strowe Nowe leto"; in Sotho/North, as "Mahlatsi
a Matswalo a Morena le Ngwaga o Moswa"; in Sotho/South, as "Litakalerso Tse
Monate Tsa Kere Semese Le Mahlohonolo a Selemo Se Secha"; in Spanish, as
"Feliz Navidad y Próspero Año Nuevo"; in Sranan, as "Wan switi kresneti
nanga wan bun nyun yari!"; in Sranantongo (Surinam), as "Wan Santa Bedaki";
in Subanen, as "Piak Pasko Pu Piag Bago Tawn"; in Sudanese, as "Wilujeng
Natal Sareng Warsa Enggal"; in Suena, as "Kerisimasi kokopai"; in
Surigaonon, as "Malipayon na pasko sanan bag-on tuig!"; in Swahili, as
"Krismas Njema Na Heri Za Mwaka Mpya"; in Swedish, as "God Jul och Gott Nytt
År"; in Tagakaulu, as "Madyaw Pagsalog sa Pagka-otaw ni Jesus & Aw mauntong
na bago Umay!"; in Tagalog, as "Maligayang Pasko at Manigong Bagong Taon sa
Inyong Lahat"; in Tahitian, as "Ia ora i te Noere e ia ora na i te matahiti
'api"; in Tala Andig, as "Maayad ha pasko daw bag-ong tuig"; in Tamazight,
as "Asseggwas Ameggaz"; in Tamil, as "Nathar Puthu Varuda Valthukkal"; in
Tanaina, as "Natukda Nuuphaa"; in Tarifit, as "Asuggas Asa'di"; in Tayal, as
"Pqaquasta ta. Pquasta hentang na Jesu"; in Telugu, as "Nootana Samvatchara
Subhakanshalu"; in Tewa, as "Hihchandi Núuphaa"; in Thai, as "Suksan Wan
Christmas lae Sawadee Pee Mai"; in Tigrinya (Eritrea), as "Rahoosbaal ledit
yegabarelkoom"; in Tlingit, as "Xristos Khuwdziti kax sh kaxtoolxetl"; in
Tok Pisin, as "Meri Krismas & Hepi Nu Yia"; in Tokelau, as "Ke whakamanuia
te Kirihimahi & Tauhaga Fou fiafia"; in Tongan, as "Kilisimasi Fiefia & Ta'u
fo'ou monu ia"; in Toraja, as "Salama' Natal & Selama' taun baru"; in
Trukese, as "Neekirissimas annim oo iyer seefe feyiyeech!"; in Tshiluba, as
"Diledibua dilenga dia Mfumu Tshidimu tshipia tshipia th silenga"; in
Tswana, as "Keresemose o monate le masego a ngwaga o montsha"; in Tubetube,
as "Yayaliyaya Yesu sikabi kaiwena"; in Tumbuka, as "Kristu wabe namwe
munyengo ya Christmas"; in Turkish, as "Noeliniz Ve Yeni Yiliniz Kutlu
Olsun"; in Tutchone, as "Ut'ohudinch'i Hulin Dzenu & Eyum nan ek'an
nenatth'at danji te yesohuthin ch'e hadaatle sh'o"; in Ukrainian, as
"Veseloho Vam Rizdva i Shchastlyvoho Novoho Roku!"; in Umbundu, as "Natale,
Natale, Oyo O Natale & Eteke Lio Bowano, Illimo Ciwa"; in Urdu, as "Naya
Saal Mubarak Ho"; in Uvean, as "Italo fa ide tau fou nei eseke"; in Uyghur,
as "YanghI yiling ahlqIs bolgey!"; in Valencian, as "Bon Nadal i millor any
nou"; in Vespi, as "Rastvoidenke i Udenke Vodenke"; in Vietnamese, as "Chuc
Mung Giang Sinh Chuc Mung Tan Nien"; in Votian, as "Yvaa rashtagoa! & Yvaa
uutta vootta!"; in Waray-Waray, as "Maupay nga Pasko ngan Mainuswagon nga
Bag-o nga Tuig!"; in Warlpiri, as "Miri Kirijimiji & Nyuntunpa Ngurrju
nyayirni yapa"; in Welsh, as "Nadolig LLawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda"; in
Xhosa, as "Siniqwenelela Ikrisimesi EmnandI Nonyaka Omtsha Ozele
Iintsikelelo Namathamsanqa"; in Yayeya, as "Krisema"; in Yiddish, as "Gute
Vaynakhtn un a Gut Nay Yor"; in Yoruba, as "E ku odun, e hu iye' dun!"; in
Yugoslavian, as "Cestitamo Bozic"; in Yup'ik (Siberian), as "Quyanalghii
Kuusma & Quyangalleq Nutaghamun Aymiqulleq"; in Zarma, as "Barka da Issa
hay-yan hann & Barka da djiri barey-yan"; in Zaza, as "Newroz'a tu Piroz be";
in Zia, as "Kerisimasi wosewa"; in Zime, as "El ma ka bar vra aso vei Lu &
El ma ka kim na mireu"; or in Zulu, as "Sinifesela Ukhisimusi Omuhle Nonyaka
Omusha Onempumelelo".
25 festival in 368 languages.
Dr Anthony E Smart
2857 Europa Drive
Costa Mesa
California 92626-3525
United States of America
Telephone: (714) 754-1870
Email: AntnySmart@sbcglobal.net
(Reprinted by permission)
=====================================================
Dear Anthony,
What a great way to greet Christmas, Solstice, and the New Year!
Let us celebrate the great diversity of our planet in a spirit of tolerance and love, in all the languages of all the people. We are not that different from one another, though each one of us is infinitely unique in Who we are.
And as an afterthought to our excellent Christmas Eve afterdinner discussion, over very fine cognac, on Goedel's Theorem, which I failed to grasp totally while also failing to explain interrelationship as the underlying principle of a universal system; I must add:
We live in an "interactive" universe!
Cheers!
Ivan
By davet84 on Wednesday, January 1, 2003 - 02:51 am:
(1) To hope that common sense prevails among men, that more women will be in power, and that Depression in the Western sphere is looked at;
(2) To further follow the Noble Eightfold Path of right view, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration;
(3) To offer my services for nothing, or maybe just a cup of coffee and a sandwich, and uh, clothes, hmm, clean water too, near a forest, where possible.
"What Buddha Nature Said - Circa 2003"
Dave T in the Southern sphere.
By davet84 on Wednesday, January 1, 2003 - 02:58 am:
By gaia on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 - 04:20 pm:
How much would you pay for "humane" meat?
See: http://www.hsus.org/ace/11513
By Ivan A. on Monday, January 20, 2003 - 11:40 am:
On the eve of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we had the privilege of attending a celebration at the spacious home of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Brown in Santa Ana, where about 40 people attended. It was an interfaith gathering sponsored by the Santa Ana Baha'is, with people of all ages and races and faiths. The evening's program included a musical prelude on guitar by Isaac Cavaliero, followed by young people who sang or played instruments: Viergen DeGree sang "Amazing Grace", Jane Lee and Ursula Matlock and Erick Morales on piano with classical and jazz, Jonathan Brothers on trumpet, all accomplished musicians with a mark of excellence. Speakers included Dr. Paul Apodaca, educator of Navajo background, who spoke on the complexity of modern life and the need for education to master such complexities; Bea Jones, who spoke of the American African Flags; and Damian Lewis, who reenacted a fabulous speech by Dr. King "I have A Dream". The evening was hosted by a delightful young African American woman, Deanna Morgan, who is a writer for a local television station, and we finished the evening with all singing "We Shall Overcome". Refreshments and good conversation followed. It was a very fitting way to celebrate the birthday of a great man, and Cinzia and I felt privileged and blessed to have been invited to such a great gathering, with a sense of hope for the future of a multi-cultural and multi-faith American and global society of free human beings.
Ivan
By Eds. on Saturday, February 1, 2003 - 11:12 pm:
Today the Space Shuttle Columbia met with a tragic end, taking with her seven great and noble men and women. The loss to their families, their friends, their nation, and to the world is grieved by all of the planet, Earth. Our halting steps into space have taken us to edge of the canopy of heaven, only to remind us of the dangers of leaving our beautiful blue water world. Yet, being the humans we are, the challenge of space and beyond forever calls us, for it is Who we are. Mars calls, and the more distant planets. If there is to be a redemption of the loss of lives in this tragic disaster, if there is to be victory from this sad event, let it be this: that we will successfully pursue a mission to Mars with the new continuous thrust rocket design. Setbacks do not turn us back, but renew our resolve. And when we get there, let us remember the men and women who lost their lives today.
God Bless our World,
Editors, Humancafe
By Ivan A. on Saturday, February 15, 2003 - 06:08 pm:
Millions join anti-war protests worldwide/BBC news:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2765215.stm
This is how the world will slowly move from principles of coercion towards those of agreement. But there will be many reversals along the way, as there will be those who will trespass on others. Agreement will win in the end, and war will wither away like a dead poisonous vine.
Ivan
By Monday on Sunday, February 16, 2003 - 06:54 am:
I truly hope you are right. While writing this I am looking at a picture in today’s newspaper: two young Arab children playing on the stairs of their house in Hebron. On the gate, there is the text: death to Arabs. There will still be many people trespassing on others, as you say. A common vanity for the most of us is to stay alive. How unhappy for the Jews and for themselves their existence might be, the Arabs cannot afford of taking notice of the constant threats. Should they leave their homes? Where would they go? More and more of the land is being occupied by fanatic Jewish settlers. And still, one can very well understand their security needs as well. By building houses and working hard for their families, they wish to guarantee a better future for their sons and daughters in the promised land. What they (as so many of us) might have missed is that the future has already begun.
We know that no peace based on hatred will ever last. Believing that it does would be as absurd as assuring oneself that love can grow in hatred. Concessions given under pressure will only cause more sorrow. The real issue is still how to live. We can plead to lack of choices, knowing all the time that every second there is a new choice, and nobody except us is going to take it. Every round of violence will cost dearly, indeed. No responsible human being wants it. I would rather like to bet on spring, love and new generation. And on peaceful demonstrations against war, of course. In the matters of peace and war we cannot afford to be silent.
Ivan, I congratulate you on the name of this site: Humancafé. This kind of forums are very much welcome.
By Ivan A. on Monday, February 17, 2003 - 12:02 pm:
We are still in the winter of our discontent, and dare only hope that the future will come with greater clarity than our past. The dichotomy of hatred and love is deeply infused within our common human psyche, so that it is natural for us to take sides in conflict, though still a novelty to find neutral grounds where dialogue and understanding can win. To find agreement is an art. And from these perilous storms we can look forward to a better clime where soft scented flowers and bright butterflies will replace these bitter snows. Slowly the world turns.
Thanks for writing, and Welcome!
Ivan
By Monday on Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 12:01 pm:
You are welcome to take sides. Reformulating myself: In matters of war and peace we are not neutral. We are on the side of peace. I promise to come back as soon as I get some time. I have a plenty of ideas which I want to explore. I think that I have found the right forum for doing that. Be well.
By Ivan A. on Friday, April 18, 2003 - 02:27 am:
Our 21st century is the first century where we can begin thinking of ourselves as truly a Global Village. Everything from communications, to jet travel, to international commerce, to the internet has consolidated us into a planet wide unity which now affects us from every part of the globe, and to every part of the globe. Nation states will still exist, same as states exist within our United States, but their individual roles as power bases will need greater consolidation in the future to reflect the new planet wide reality of people who can talk to each other almost instantaneously. It is the same for other forces that at times are beyond our control, such as world wide diseases like AIDS, or now SARS, so that what happens on one end of the world will affect, or infect, another. Our need to address ecological global issues is in the same camp, that global warming or dying oceans or extinction of fauna and flora species, is a concern for all on the planet. It is the same issue for clean water. What breeds from this ecological, health and well being potential disasters, is a growing concern that they are interrelated into all our human activity, so that a great death rate of AIDS victims in Africa, or Asia, for example, may be the necessary fodder for a growth in economic dysfunctions, which then leads to leadership dysfunctions, which then leads to cultivating a breeding ground of discontent, which in the end leads to social dysfunctions. What all these dysfunctions lead to in the end is a dissolvement of civilized values, and with it come attack on the achievements of centuries of civilization, which today manifests itself as global terrorism. In the future, it may take other forms, for example, where the democratic principles themselves are used to coerce into place power to take away our individual human rights, to enslave where democracy was created to liberate. This may become a serious issue as those who cannot abide by democratic principles of human rights and equality will use that same democracy to undo its principles from within. Because we are so interrelated as a world, it will be especially important to keep this future danger in clear focus, for once our freedoms are taken away, it is very difficult to regain them.
This is the future we must face, for we are the makers of our future. As we get through the 21st century and enter into the 22nd, we should have addressed these global issues to the point where terrorism, world wide pandemics, oppressive democracies, and economic failure for many parts of the world, should have been examined and addressed by not only our world leaderships, but also by all the thinking and aware individual citizens of our planet. And if we do this, if we preserve our individual human rights in a democratic world, then we will have come a long way towards eliminating many of the other ills which plague our planet today. Will the United Nations play a part in this new Global Village? Perhaps, but to do so effectively, it will need to embrace the principles that gave us the power of liberty as a priority, and thus be reorganized not as merely a philanthropic organization, but as an organization that protects and sanctifies our individual rights as free human beings.
Ivan
By Eds. on Tuesday, June 24, 2003 - 03:08 pm:
This is a new breaktrhough in China-India relations. In future negotiations China may try to have the Dalai Lama oustead from India, but this would be a mistake of pure coercion. If this were so, India would be right to resist. Greater economic and cultural exchange between these two Asian giants is a good thing, but it should not be done at the expense of Tibet. The people of Tibet are still pivotal, depending on how they are able to achieve greater autonomy and independence, to future world peace. Both China and India should be aware of this important country on their continent. We will know we are going forward when this greater independence and cultural recognition of the oppressed people of Tibet, as recognized by the whole world, is recognized as well as by people of China and India. All agreements between these nations must be free of coercion, for this is pivotal to ultimately achieving world peace.
Editors, Humancafe.com
By Ivan A. on Saturday, July 5, 2003 - 04:55 pm:
When human beings reach a certain level of maturity, of consciousness, they then have to make a choice, either to continue to interact through coercion or through agreement. Of course, if they choose coercion, than nothing is changed and we go on in our socially dysfunctional manner as we had for millennia. But if we choose to go with agreement, then our world changes in ways of which we have had only fleeting glimpses thus far. This is the basis of the whole idea behind Habeas Mentem.
The special case is the suicide bomber, since he or she had obviously made the choice for coercion. However, in killing others he or she also kills oneself, so that the possibility of improving on that choice in the future is now irreversibly lost. There is no hope of that individual ever making the choice for agreement, so therefore there is no hope for that choice to ever become more evolved. So the suicide bomber, in effect, closes off a future evolution of human choices, certainly for the person blowing up, but also for those who are to follow in his or her self destructive path. So this is an evolutionary dead end, one which is irreversible. Can the world ever move forward with people blowing themselves up in the name of their ideals? No, never. To go forward we must choose agreement. And if the final choice is one of total coercion, to kill, then such agreement becomes impossible.
What is the likely outcome? Eventually, suicide bombing will become recognized by surviving descendants that it is a bankrupt act, a final act of complete self destruction. In effect, with all due respect for the dead, it is a final desperate act to keep humanity from evolving, from moving forward into a higher consciousness where freedom of choice allows for human beings to live by agreements. That is the only way to world peace.
Ivan
By Pi.r2 on Sunday, July 13, 2003 - 12:58 pm:
COUNCIL AROUND A CAMPFIRE
Under a full moon the men of the clan are sitting around a campfire, discussing the events of the day.
- "We must be careful with Ork, he has some agreeing with him."
- "Dangerous. Could split the clan. When we do spring migration, he make take them with him. Women too."
- "We better invite him into our circle, so he can explain why he is sowing dissent."
- "Hmm.. I am chief, so I will confront him."
Ork is brought before the fire council.
- "Ork, before you joined our clan, you were a hermit. Then you came to us with your round wood disk to show the children how to roll it with a stick. It was very funny, an all were much amused by this. Though, sometimes the children hurt themselves playing, like when the wood disk rolls over their toes. But what you are suggesting we do is dangerous."
- "I only wanted to show how putting two wood disks together with a pole between them could carry a load."
- "Yes, we know. We of the council ignored your request. We have always from our father and forefather dragged our campwares on forked poles. Now you say we can raise these poles on this new wood disk together with a pole, and... how foolish, what was that you called it?... to 'roll' the wares to our summer site. Tsk tsk, that is not good. We cannot allow this. You see, that is dangerous."
- "We didn't mind when you balanced yourself on the pole between two disks and rode it down hill until your ass burned. That amused everyone. Remember, we laughed until our bellies hurt! But to change what has always been..."
- "But I only said this to make work easier, to make the trip lighter, so we do not have to leave so many things behind at winter camp."
- "You cannot change what we have always done... Look into this fire, and see how our forefathers had always had fire. This is how it must be. We have what we have and must never do more than is allowed. When our old shaman looked into the flames, he saw tragedy with your roller disks, disaster for generations and generations."
- "Or we will be laughed at by all the other clans when we gather at the spring valley."
- "Or worse, the gods may turn against us, and we will all die."
Everyone agreed this was a most terrible thing, to be laughed at by the other clans, or have the gods turn their wrath on them.
- "And what if your rollers break? Then what?"
- "I am but a simple hermit, with your permission, if I may speak freely. But if they break, would we not be back to what we always had?"
- "Obstinate! Buffoon! How can he make jokes! How can we make you understand?"
- "We of the council cannot let you make these rollers. You cannot make them without our permission. And we know that some clan members have already made them for themselves... Are you trying to split the clan?"
- "Oh, no, dear elders. It was never my intent! I only wanted to show how easy it is."
- "Easy or not, you will be banished if you persist, and forced back into exhile."
- "A life a hermit is not so terrible... Can I bring a woman with me?"
- "Yes. Take that headstrong one, she who makes spears fly from a string. She is trouble too. But if you return, with those foolish rollers of yours, you will be severely punished. Do you understand?"
- "Yes. You are the great leaders of the clan, and I but a humble clansman."
- "So, what is your plan? We offer you a free choice."
All eyes were now staring at Ork, who looked down sheepishly into the fire.
- "I will pursue the oryx with you, and forget the rollers... But can the children still play with the wooden disks?"
- "They may. But only that! Anything else is treason to the clan. You understand?"
- "The council has spoken. You are dismissed. Now we may pass the smoking reed."
All heads nodded that this was wise council, and that the clan had been spared from further embarrassment, or the wrath of the gods.
When Ork turned away, a wry smile crossed over his face. He got the woman he wanted.
-When pies are squared and pigs fly J
By Ivan A. on Saturday, August 9, 2003 - 02:46 pm:
The Guardian of the UK accuses the US of imperial delusions. In its article by Eric Hobsbawm, dated June 14, 2003, "America's imperial delusion",
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,977470,00.html
it says:
"Few things are more dangerous than empires pursuing their own interest in the belief that they are doing humanity a favour."
Empire building had happened throughout history from Alexander to Caesar to Genghis Kahn to Napoleon. Egyptians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Spanish, French, Portuguese, British, all had a run at world empires. Today, China and Russia and the United States, and perhaps Japan, command the largest empires, if their regions of commercial or geographic influence are considered. If religion is considered imperial, then Christianity and Mohammedism are two great empires, though in its time Buddhism and Hinduism also commanded expanding regions of populations. So there is something natural in human beings to create world dominating empires. Today, the world superpower is the United States of America. Did this happen by default, or by design, or was this change simply inevitable?
Previous empires wanted to be empires. It is not clear, though the Guardian's writer may disagree, that the United States wants to be imperial. Rather, this commercial engine of trade, which characterizes the economic and military thrust of the American empire, is reluctant to dominate political regions, other than to protect its self interest and national security. When the protection of two major oceans failed them on September 11th, America took on a new challenge. Though the previous world war cast America into a central world role, in opposition to the threat of Stalinist-Communism, and as a key supporter of NATO and the United Nations, the US was put into a role of a de facto world policeman. This became a role more distasteful after Viet Nam. However, it was not until it was attacked that it determinately took on this new world role. This may not be well suited for the American people, and though democracy has many virtues, it also suffers from the fact that competing ideas will never present a consistent direction of action, nor of what it is people want. Therefore, the national policy of democracy is subject to fluctuations, what is popular one election becomes unpopular in the next, which often results in inconsistent policy. The fact that Washington is oftentimes confused in its foreign policy is an example of that, which is confusing to the rest of the world, and often damaging to US self interests as well. Democracy, unless taken over by an emperor, is not a governmental form well suited to imperialism.
Empires also form from weakness rather than strength. When China was attacked by Mongolian hordes, it solidified into an empire behind its great wall. Most empires form to consolidate and safeguard its trading interests, so that Genoa or Venice were once imperial powers due to their trade in the Mediterranean and the far east. Holland took over the regions of the spice islands, which today results in the archipelago of Indonesia. These are not the same as Mussolini wanting to take over north Africa, or Hitler all of Europe. But it is more similar to Nicholas II taking over lands from Europe to Asia, in part by imperial design, but also in part to protect Russian borders from China, which was then carried over into the Leninist-Stalinist Soviet era. When Communism fell of its own weight, simply because it turned out to be an unworkable economic or political model, the Russian empire became threatened with sedition, such as being witnessed in Chechnya. So empire has no central focal origin by which it can be defined. Empires happen as much from strength as from weakness.
By this reasoning, to say that the United States seeks empire is about as inaccurate as to say Islam is seeking empire. Both forces result in what appears to be world domination, but for very different reasons. Islam is undergoing change, since its basic teachings are challenged philosophically by the principles of western culture. This is forcing change on a people who followed what is essentially a conservative way of life, to do God's will. This ancient way of life is now being challenged by modern ideas, that it is more desirable to do freely, within law, what is each person's will. Think how threatening this idea must be, where free inquiry replaces submission. Can two cultures be more opposed? In fact, the idea of individual liberty and democratic government, though it has its historic roots in European Enlightenment, nevertheless did not take possession of world consciousness until the American experiment succeeded. Now this is an idea that is being courted and exported world wide. Is this empire? No, it is merely change, that human beings are demanding that they have the freedom to express themselves as they will in terms of who they are. This is a new planetary human identity in the making, thus a powerful historic force. The regions of the worlds, whether Judeo-Christian or Islamic, or Sino-Asian, must then make room for change for this new human awareness. That the great world religion of Islam had been vocally and forcibly hijacked by a small group of fundamentalist extremists is not what the religion is really about, but only one extremely violent interpretation of its peaceful teachings. Of course it is the wrong interpretation, since it forces the religion into a position of aggression rather than expressing God's love, and peace on Earth, which is what all religions are deemed to represent. Therefore, this change towards extreme fundamentalism is no more than the dying cries of a world that is being forced to change by how the planet is changing. Change will happen, because their populations demand it, especially the young, whether in Iran or Saudi Arabia or Egypt, but it will not be easy. Yet, from that cry for change comes a need to form empire, to counter balance this change with a religious fervour, violently forcing their particular brand of extremism on the rest of us. In this is also their self destruction, a kind of religious suicide, that focusses the world's negative attention on them, to their detriment, where assets are frozen, individuals arrested or killed, homes destroyed, great barriers erected into a state of siege, in effect, condemnation and war. This is not a war of nation against nation, but rather a war of cultural principles. As a result, September 11th did not weaken America's world domination, but rather strengthened it by forcing it to reach globally into safeguarding its home security.
The American people, happily isolationist, did not want this role, but it had been placed on them. Though not imperial by nature, the inevitable result is that they then exercised their power, of which they have much both military and cultural, to change the world where principles of human rights and democratic government still do not exist. Afghanistan and Iraq became the first stages for this struggle, of which the outcome is not yet clear. But this is not imperialism in the form of past centuries, rather it is de facto imperialism of the 21st century due to the changing nature of the world's populations. From China to Russia to Africa to South America, people want more freedom and more say in how things are run for them, which runs contrary to the quasi-feudal systems they inherited throughout Earth's history. Who in power wants to give it up? Will Taylor in Liberia step down willingly? Will Castro release his Cuba from his grip? No. Power once entrenched is unwilling to let go. And yet change demands that this happen, that the dictators of the world release their hold on their populations in order to accommodate the new reality of the planet, that human beings want to be free.
So is this world domination, or is it change? Colonial empires came and went, because in the end they were not viable models. Classical colonialisms, of the kind exercised when Britain successfully administered India, no longer work. Their existence lasted only as long as a subservient colonial population allowed them to. But same as the American revolution cast off the yoke of king George, so have the other colonial nations pushed back the European powers. Today we are faced with a new change, which the Guardian calls "imperialism of human rights", which is not far from the truth. In fact, this is what the world demands, and what is being fought against by the old orders of extreme conservatism, whether religious, or dictatorship. An "imperialism of human rights" is what the world is asking for. However, as the Guardian writer also points out in the end, to make this new world order work, "enlightened self-interest and education have to take over". Indeed.
Ivan Alexander
By herethink on Saturday, October 4, 2003 - 04:40 pm:
When does Science become Religion? In every religion there is a structure of truths arrived at both rationally and irrationally until they become accepted by the true believers. These truths are self inclusive totally, in that they represent all the possibles within what is believed, often written into sacred scripture, so that any questions must be referred to these scriptures for answers. When any idea conflicts with these stated truths, dogmas, they are then deemed in error, even if there is irrefutable empirical data to affirm otherwise, and those in error must be corrected. Hence, religion has power over the observable world and our ideas of it, for what is believed and written is the truth.
The basic tenet of science is that all ideas are suspect until proven with observable facts and theories that reasonably explain these observations. Mostly they are rational ideas, though as such they are not accepted until verified in reality. The hallmark of science is that it is a fluid world devoid of dogma, so that what is acceptable today may not be tomorrow, and there should be no objection to this. What is written down in scientific formulation is always subject to being contested and, when appropriate, to be changed. So ideas may find a place a priori in formulating theory, but their efficacy is not granted until proven, which requires cooperation of the real world to show why this is so. Once proven, though still suspect as to its total truth, it then joins the scriptures of science in the form of accepted theory or formulations. So the holy writ of science changes continually, since there is no a priori dogma other than that all theories must be tested against reality. This is science's power over our thoughts and beliefs, that reality is the book on which is written the truth.
What has evolved between these two major forces over the human mind is that in both religion and science had been recognized authorities in the form of persons. For religion, it is usually the founder, or prophet, a manifestation of God, or some great teacher often called a Son of God. In science the authority is he or she whose ideas had been most accepted by the largest number of intellectuals. However, where science and religion merge is that once such a personality is recognized for his or her authority, to challenge them becomes a kind of anathema. Perhaps this is a result of how humans are hard wired, their human nature, that we wish to follow leaders. However in the case of science, this becomes a contradiction of what science represents, for there should be no incontestable personalities affecting scientific inquiry, if the basic tenet of science is to be observed. Great religious figures are not against the basic tenet of religion, since their teachings have the weight of law. But in science, all teachings are subject to future revision, once the universal law of how reality is structured is plumbed further and understood. Therefore, for great names such as Newton or Descartes or Einstein to become milestones of their science should be viewed that they are only beacons in a larger search, and to make their ideas incontestable, no matter how seemingly incontestable the accepted theory, should not be discouraged, but instead pursued. The idea of science is to find fault, and when fault is not found, then it may join the ranks of truth, temporarily. The real arbiter of truth is not the human mind, but reality itself.
So when does science become religion? When this idea that finding fault with the great founders of truths becomes forbidden. The danger, of course, is that once this fault is found, a great structure of belief systems is at risk of crumbling, much as Ptolameic astronomy had crumbled before Copernicus and Kepler. It is possible to imagine Cartesian mathematics crumbling before some better simplified system, same as Newtonian physics had to give way to the Relativity of Einstein. But even there, there exists the possibility that the whole structure of Einstein's Relativity will crumble before an empirical observation of how works gravity in the universe. And if this is so, to fail to allow for this challenge to accepted beliefs means science had become ossified into a religion, which it is not.
For humanity to progress into the future, where we better understand reality and our place in it, we need to allow for new ideas challenging the old, even if the old will suffer a terrible blow and undo centuries of error. A true understanding of our human being in the universe will no doubt allow for both science and religion, where both are better served if they agree, but neither should hold such possession of the human mind that change cannot be allowed. Change is a fact of reality and the evolution of mind where we can separate truth from myth. To become fully conscious beings, we need the truth.
herethink
By Ivan A. on Sunday, October 5, 2003 - 12:00 am:
Me thinks these are 'heretic' words on science, so in good company on these boards, where science had likewise been questioned, though not in same terms.
:-]
We must not forget religion's preocupation with good or evil, and the devil, whereas the science is more concerned with personal and social dysfunction, for example. The two are inherently different, one historic dating back to ancient times, the other relatively new, though neither is free of popular myths. Good points.
Ivan
By herethink on Sunday, October 5, 2003 - 11:34 am:
h.
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 12:11 am:
The most difficult rule of discipline of all is to obey that there are no 'rules', except an awareness of doing things to each other either through agreement or coercion. How we choose consciously is a mark of how we are individually and socially.
We manifest these if we choose to do by Agreement:
Charity, honesty, compassion, truthfulness, mutual exchange, generosity, creation, artistic, evolution, openness, courage, friendship, trust, rule of law, democratic, human rights, ethics, love and peace.
We manifest if by Coercion:
Conquest, oppression, abuse, deception, distress, physical degradation, pollution, manipulation, confusion, repression, enslavement, devolution, falsehood, gossip, fear, tyranny, corruption, hate and war.
We live and die by these rules of discipline, self and for others, which if done without being conscious of Who we are, and without the tolerance for others, these rules to guide us quickly regress into coercion. By Agreement, we move forward, with joy; by Coercion we regress, with the negative attention of pain. Discipline through negative attention is regressive, as a rule.
Ivan
By Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 - 01:41 pm:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3417429.stm
Europe... "there is talk of trying to create a "European" form of Islam - basically a secularised version, where private religious beliefs are tolerated but not any manifestations of Islam which undermine European laws and customs."
This is a key question, can it work? The American model of cultural assimilation in a social environment of secular religious freedom and division between church and state may work for Europe too. Wearing the head scarf by Muslim women, if done as an overt expression of their religion, runs counter to this secular idea of religious freedom by imposing their religion on others in public. Though banned in public places, they are free to practice their religion privately, provided it is not divisive for society as a whole. Religious tolerance cuts both ways, provided neither imposes its will on the other.
Al salaam
By Eds. on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 01:24 pm:
http://ubuntu.upc.es/
Sanctity of the individual
Ubuntu
Forgiveness
Unity of Society
These are Ubuntu.
(copied from "World Mind Society" thread)
By Ivan A. on Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 01:26 pm:
If you consider that human beings are all descended from a very small population of survivors, where we were almost down to extinction only about 40,000 years ago, then we are all 'cousins' only 2000 generations removed. And since we are in effect 'out of Africa', all races and peoples, then the African tradition of Ubuntu as an operative philosophy for our planet Earth makes sense. If SUFU is merely an acronym: Sanctity of the individual, Ubuntu, Forgiveness, and the Unity of society, then it too is an operative for how our Human Rights and the Social Contract defines us all as men and women of this world. This is how our world is evolving, something defining us as a human species which, according to Habeas Mentem, is now evolving into Who we are. Incorporating the best traditions of all the world's cultures we can, through SUFU and Ubuntu, evolve into the great conscious beings we will become. To complete this evolution will need that we learn to do through agreement rather than through coercion, for then we can say that we will be safe from our own induced extinction. The future of SUFU is now.
Ivan
By Ivan A. on Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 12:57 pm:
So I would say the same to humans: "He who hits first loses." Of course, this could apply to children in day-care pre-school, where the frustrated teacher wants to control the children hitting each other over toys. Doubtless they have some understanding if it, but it seems to be lost on adults. There, "he who coerces first loses." But no doubt, this is not well understood, so we continue to live in a world dominated by coercion rather than by agreement.
Of course, when it is understood that "he who barks first loses", then we will have reached an evolutionary quantum jump in consciousness. J
Ivan
By Eds. on Monday, March 1, 2004 - 10:44 pm:
The 'United States' of Iraq may yet be a proving ground for Jefferson's vision of a free and independent people in the model of a neo-Madisonian constitution honoring individual rights, free speech, and religious freedom, in a representative government, if this should come to pass. Iraq's Governing Council, while still under American occupation, has drafted a constitution which through compromise has produced a document honoring democratic principles alongside those of religion and the role of Islam. If this new religious tolerance is reflective of the Iraqi people, then it is a great achievement indeed. May its success be the first step towards a regional peace, and ultimately a World Peace.
BBC News: "Iraqis agree draft constitution": http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3495996.stm
Editors, Humancafe
By Ivan A. on Monday, March 8, 2004 - 07:18 pm:
happy, thanks for the kind frank comments, and sharing of ideas.
Indeed, were it so simple to improve humankind's lot as to command "thou shalt not do violence", it would have been in the original Ten Commandments, though we may notice that even the bible is full of violence. If God is the ultimate philosopher, then He too did not sway us from the folly of our violent human ways. Thus it falls to us mortals to manage as best we can.
We could theorize that a future resistance to violence; in particular where we force others who are blameless against their will; could eventually yield a less violent world. For example, if more people boycotted violent films, would it not send a clear message to Hollywood? Perhaps curtailing vicarious violence as entertainment would start some movement towards a greater awareness, or consciousness of the value of peace. Though, people may still find a way to this entertainment in secret, in dog or cockfights, or clandestine back alley boxing, no gloves, blood allowed, and thus force violence underground. Mel Gibson is not guilty in any way in his portrayal of a violent ending for Christ's story by bringing out into the open what we are really all about. In fact, it may serve us well, as a violent human species, to put it in our face.
I think it comes down to what it is we want to choose. If we find cause for violence, not merely to end violence, but to impose our way of thinking, our philosophical way of life, our moral codes, our religious values, on others against their will, violence will beget more violence. Vengeance is likewise a repeatable, where in the end the combatants will forget why they are fighting, until one side either gives up, is enslaved, or dies. No doubt many ancient blood feuds were fought to a bitter end, though today they are no longer remembered... Who cares why they fought and killed so earnestly? Historically, can we really know why we always battled it out? Probably not, though every historian will seek to find a root cause. But like in a disappearing act, one day the fight is over. Why did it have to start in the first place? Too complex to answer simply. But it is not too complex to find a philosophical root cause to all violence, that in our passions we will abandon words and use force instead. Whether it is a calculated use of force, or a reactionary unconscious lashing out, the end result is the same. Unjustly, somebody will be hurt.
Would raising human consciousness of the consequences of our actions, and of our motives, our beliefs and ideas, bring about a less violent and more peaceful world? Only if this consciousness is sought after voluntarily, by our conscious choice. To impose consciousness on others is a self canceling event, since the so-called less conscious person will resist it, as they consciously should. So for humanity to rise above its collective urge for violence would take a growing number of individuals who are choosing to not use violence, to find peaceful means of averting it, and to teach others to not use force. This may seem a futile recipe, but our future humanity kind of depends on it, of necessity. The most powerful men and women will be then those who are best at stopping violence rather than those who are most violent. Then, perhaps, one may hope, we could be on some path to a greater, less violent, human condition. But are we there yet? It takes brains to get there... hence, a greater consciousness. The losers will be the gangs, war lords, tyrants, abusives, criminals, while the winners will be the rest of us who choose peace.
Can humanity evolve into a greater consciousness? I suspect it will. In the aggregate, when enough people see a better solution to conflict, and do it, a kind of evolutionary consciousness would take place, where violence would be as unacceptable then as cannibalism is today.
Are we there yet? I suspect that as long as our culture is geared towards raising aggressive youth for war, the answer is no, we are not.
Ivan
----
As was posted on the Examined Life forums, Philosophy Discussion, March 8, 2004:
The Passion of the Gibson in answer to happy's post.
By AbdulWahid on Friday, March 12, 2004 - 08:43 pm:
Or.
...
By Eds. on Saturday, April 10, 2004 - 09:53 am:
Should someone take the blame for the horrific 911 attack on targets in New York and Washington, DC? Yes, the terrorists should take the blame. They did it.
Could it have been prevented? In hindsight, there were warnings of an impending attack on US soil, as the PDB of August 6, 2001 hints. But without a specific threat identifying the location, date, and method, no sane person would have taken such a threat to mean the terrorists will hijack airplanes with innocent human beings in them and slam them into targets. Such suicidal behavior was still unthinkable then. Had anyone within intelligence or the administration made a strong case for it, they would have been considered mentally unstable, the event unthinkable. Yet, this was exactly what happened, the unthinkable. Now, in the leisure of examining past carnage, such an unthinkably vicious suicidal attack on our homeland has raised criticisms of possible intelligence and policy failures. They were not failures, simply lack of judgement in believing that the enemy could be so viciously insane as to do what they did. Only the terrorists are responsible for the horrors of 911, 311 in Madrid, or bombings in Moscow, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Bali... alas. We must be vigilant for what those inhumanly dysfunctional minds filled with loathing can unleash against civilized progressive peoples, for in their insane hatreds of our freedoms, they are sure to follow. Primitive barbaric terrorism has no boundaries.
The terrorist network of Al Qaeda, and their religiously misguided supporters, believe they have struck at the heart of our culture by attacking our means of transportation, our financial center, our government. But they failed. We are not those things. Our heart is in each and all of us who cherish freedom, who understand the difficult responsibility this freedom entails, and who are vigilant against future attacks. Our individual human rights come at a high price, one we are willing to pay. Because our hearts are strong, because we are conscious of our mission, of the right to be who we are, they will not succeed. Theirs is a simple choice, to either join the rest of humanity in a historical movements towards greater equality and individual freedoms, or be left behind in a world of fear, deceit, hatred, and a life of oppressive coercions. One seeks conscious agreements, to be one with future humanity, the other is suicidal. We have made our choice. It is not our fault if they cannot make theirs. On this Easter Sunday, God help us, help them, towards Peace on Earth.
Editors, Humancafe
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 01:17 pm:
Can we translate the freedom we believe in our souls to those who do not? This is not an idle question, for this is exactly what we are challenged with in bringing democracy to Iraq and the Middle East. Our mission in that contentiously violent part of the world is to bring stability and human rights in the form of a constitutional government that will function adequately to insure these freedoms. Is it in their hearts and souls to accept these?
The Arab world does not have a history of free and democratic institutions. There was no Magna Carta, no Enlightenment movement, no Jefferson and Madison, no Thoreaux or Emerson, to guide their way towards a civilization where the human values of peace, liberty, equality, pursuit of happiness, were enshrined in their institutions of law and government. There lies the great gulf between us, a gulf that is bridgeable only through education, good will, resolve, and the acceptance of these values by the leaders of their world. If their religious leaders so fear secularization of Arab society, a separation of church and state universally valuable in the West, that they will fight us at every turn, then it is a lost cause... unless others within Arab society can take up the leadership to move their society forward. This would fall to educators, to moderate enlightened religious leaders, to government officials with vision, to those who endorse truth and integrity over power and greed; for it is them who must take the reins of power. This is a monumental demand, civilization. How can it be that where the seat of our western civilization began thousands of years ago, Babylon, had fallen so far behind as to be one of the more regressive? Surely it is not because the people of Iraq and the Middle East are without freedom in their souls. They are no different from the rest of humanity on the planet. Their souls burn with a need for freedom as in any man or woman. But they had been beaten, confused by their so-called spiritual teachers who taught to hate rather than to love, been oppressed by their governmental regimes into cowering submission. The Arab soul had been damaged by its own, and to undo this damage there will be the need from within their world to rise great minds, the likes of Jefferson and Thoreaux, who will ring freedom in their ears. It will happen, but it also takes time to bridge this great gulf of civilizations between us. We can only show the way across this bridge, but we cannot force them to cross it.
Logic, courage, compassion, and trust. These are the four pillars that uphold democracy. A lesser pillar is economic well being, but it is distant fifth from the first. Hardship and suffering is not unknown to the Arab people, and though they are well endowed with natural wealth in oil, their economies cannot prosper without these main four. To overcome hardship, they must embrace these four realities of freedom.
Logic is the reason that separates truth from falsehood, so that each person knows what is real from what is deceiving. In centuries past, Arab scholars were masters of science, so we know this is not foreign to them.
Courage is a matter of will. There is no lack of will in the Arab soul, as we see daily in their self sacrifice, but it had been misdirected into a self destructive courage rather than a progressive one. It takes more courage to do good than harm.
Compassion is good will towards others in doing God's will. All the teachings of Islam call this, upon everyone to do God's will for He is the compassionate One. Everyone must have compassion in his or her heart, which is the work for their spiritual leaders.
Trust. That is the most difficult of all, to believe in one's fellow human beings, to do things truthfully, and to seek out that truth in the other. No civilization can long survive without this need for integrity, for trust, or else agreements between men become meaningless. This last may be the Arab world's greatest challenge, to seek out leadership and teachers who demand this trust above all else, to sacrifice all the hatred and ideologies of killing, to call upon God's compassion in all our dealings with each other, to believe in a greater good. Democracy, freedom, goodwill, courage, trust, these all work hand in hand and cannot be separated from compassion and reason. Upon these pillars of freedom are then built up civilization and the well being of society, as an economically strong and spiritually strong society.
This is the mutual bridge of freedom we must cross, both in helping the Arab people and in them helping themselves, to build upon the pillars of strength that support all civilized society. The lands of Islam have a rich history to draw upon in this new great venture, a history that harks back to the very roots that gave us a civilization in its many forms, from the democracy of the Greeks, republic of the Romans, to the European and American ideals of freedom of the Enlightenment. These progressive freedoms are now enjoyed by much of the world. It is time for the Middle East to join in this new civilization as well, Insh'Allah, for it is in their souls to do this.
By Anonymous on Friday, April 16, 2004 - 09:38 am:
BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3629765.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3632093.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3631743.stm
Maybe in one hundred years, they will be ready, not now.
By 0. on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 - 08:01 pm:
So it ends, the Epic Era of men, and begins the era of human beings, of humanity. It will be where men and women together bring a new future, a new world, for generations to come. It was the curse of our former era to be at war, like animals fighting for space, or food, or women. But that is ended, and a new world without frontiers, without conflict, is about to enter. What part of the world did not know war? What part of the world has borders when seen from space? None. So it begins.
None shall be left behind, not Arab nor Jew, nor Christian nor Hindu, nor Maori, nor Indian, nor any of the peoples of the Earth. We are all united in this, that we move forward, into a world without conflict, without trespass, where agreement is the rule. Not a world of men oppressing women, or children, or animals, or any of Life, but mindful of how we can make things better. That is the promise of the future world, the epic world to come. Be Mindful. That is the New Era.
Our past epics were war. No more. Like beasts we have fought. But he who slays one man is like slaying all men. Shave your heads, for you are fighters no more. Peace is to rule the world, in fellowship, goodwill, and the beauty of Life. Shed your weapons, begin dialogue, understand the other, find the paths to peace, for that is the way. It ends now, and so it begins.
We are the alpha and the omega. And in that we are the apha again. Peace is in every step, in every thought, in our hearts. So it begins. Do not choose to be left behind in the future. The Epic Era has begun.
0.
By Ivan A. on Thursday, June 17, 2004 - 09:42 pm:
Re ur Epic Era, yes, as you say, so it begins. The challenge will be to transition from an oppressive world, where force ruled, to one where instead are enforced agreements consciously made by mature individuals, protected from coercion. This is a very big step, already happening in faltering ways in democratic societies ruled by law. The resistance will come from those who will lose their power in this, their power to force their will on a subservient population. Compounding the problem is overpopulation, economic stagnation, and educational restrictions, so the world's accumulated knowledge cannot serve them. It is almost as if their God or ideology punishes them by their own hand, for it is of their own doing. Any ideology that wants to freeze humanity in a subservient position yields meager results, as we have already seen. So, yes, it has begun, though it will be with very great difficulty that the fruits of freedom will reach to all in the world, of all races, both sexes, and all beliefs equally. Yet, if it is in our destiny to be free, we cannot change the future.
Thanks for writing, Ivan
By Anonymous on Friday, June 18, 2004 - 01:24 am:
“And when the Lord speaks to you, who can but prophesy? I have been able to hear the voice of the Lord from my youth. I was surprised to learn recently that the majority of Christians have never heard His voice.” (BEN)
"I have cancelled your hotel reservation…” (GOD)
"When you get to the hotel, don’t get upset, just sit in the lobby and wait for me. I will get you a room. I only wanted to move you.” (GOD)
“When you get to the hotel in Anaheim, a man who I have been chasing for many years will crash into your car in the parking lot. Get out of the car and speak to him the words that I give you. And don’t worry about the car. It will just be a little ding. And besides, it’s My car.” (GOD)
“The Lord says to say to you, if you don’t return to Him and repent of your sin, He is going to kill you. This is your last warning!” (BEN)
“I created this entire country! I know where you are and you are in the wrong place! Get back on the bus. It is leaving. I don’t want to have to argue with you again.” (GOD)
"At this point the Lord was literally yelling at me. And what did I do? I thought to myself, I know the Lord wants me on this bus, so I better get on it. But if this is a mistake, He won’t hear the end of it, until He gets me out of this mess” (BEN)
"That is why I am writing this book. Dear reader, you are being warned. Listen to his voice!" (BEN)
"The highest prophetic office is held by those who can hear the Lord’s voice directly, and who have been chosen to speak to the Lord face to face.” (BEN)
*****The Benjamin Baruch ministries claim to have witness JANET RENO on LARRY KING LIVE give her definition of what a CULT is. Upon investigation, this supposed interview with Reno NEVER HAPPENED and has been documented as a HOAX and URBAN LEGEND - Even the 700 Club aired a TV show about this RENO URBAN LEGEND being just that - AN URBAN LEGEND.
Yet, the the prophet Benjamin Baruch claims he witnessed this, yet out of MILLIONS of viewers, no one else has stepped forward.
What more evidence is needed to expose a false prophet? Or can a prophet make these false allegations and still be a TRUE MESSENGER?
By Ivan A. on Friday, June 18, 2004 - 08:08 pm:
Is this the "voice of God" with a sense of Humor? I once heard said that the Bible and Prophets should have had more humor written, so at least we could laugh at our own follies we take so seriously.
I too have heard "voices" in my head, but never thought to this it was from God. Rather, it was under the stress of digging out my truck from a ditch out in the middle of the desert in the middle of the night. Funny, but they gave me good advice, and I dug out by morning, even if they did have slow drawl of local miners or ranchers. Spirits, perhaps? Or biofeedback of a stressed brain? I don't know, but I was glad to hear them just the same. As long as they are good company, give sound advice, and they don't direct me to go and hurt others, it's okay I guess.
Can God "talk" to us? In theory, God can do anything. The question is, why would anyone believe it was God? To me, to believe God is talking to us is like admitting that our ego is the size of God. But isn't that an oxymoron? Or does God REALLY have a sense of Humor for his true messengers?
Thanks for sharing Ben's,
Ivan J
By Anonymous on Saturday, July 10, 2004 - 12:49 pm:
In this BBC World News article: Analysis: Interpreting Islam, are views expressed that the majority of believers in Mohammedism do not believe in the kind of violence seen by fundamentalist extremists, that Islam is being distorted by Western Media, that recent beheadings have only reinforced these misperceptions.
It can be said with some reasonable assurance that "fundamentalists" of any faith are hardened people who cannot see outside their narrowly limited and stifled points of view, they cannot grow, spiritually dead. Their opinions are harsh of how they see the world and people in it, and quick to punish anyone who disagrees with them, or is perhaps tolerant towards another's point of view. If these "fundamental" violent believers have taken over the Faith of Islam, then it is for the people of that faith to unseat them. If they do not their religion back from their violent radicals, the West and other parts of the world will see them as perpetual regressive pariahs to modern secular human society, freedomm of choice and human rights, and of equality for men and women.
Salaam
By Anonymous on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 - 04:59 pm:
It's not ALL bad news out of Iraq. Why don't we see more positive news like this? Is the media so enthralled by the sordid, the grisly, the ghoulish, that a blind eye is turned to the hopes and courage of the Iraqi people? Are the criminals really entitled to more air time than all the descent people who want to make their country work? How about equal time for both sides, those who commit horror and murder, and those who are working for a free and democratic Iraq?
I hope the Iraqi people turn out in force for their elections in January to prove all the sordid media spinners wrong.
!
By Eds. on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 04:49 pm:
Simona Pari and Simona Torretta, the two Italian women working for Bridge to Baghdad, were there to make education better for the unfortunate Iraqis hurt by war, especially children. They were killed.* Two American constructions workers to help rebuild Iraq, Eugene Armstrong and Jack Hensley, both were captured and brutally killed. The Briton Kenneth Bigley, and two French journalists, are at risk of the same senseless murder. Their crime was that they wanted to help, to rebuild, to bring a country tyrannized by war and oppressive dictator, by mass murder, imprisonment, torture, back from the brink of the primitive. But the primitives still prevail, whether in the misbegotten name of religion, or for sheer barbarism, and their brutal killings go on.
These are purely criminal acts, as were the twelve Nepalese murdered, same with captives from the West, Italians, Americans, Bulgarians, Turks, and the Middle East, Egyptians, Jordanians, Lebanese, many Iraqis themselves, Pakistani, Korean, Algerians; killings that had long lost their credibility of any cause save for those whose ghoulish appetite in murder is never satisfied. The innocents killed, as were the children, men and women in Beslan, in Bali, East Timor, in Moscow, New York, Washington, countless suicide bombings in Israel, on intercontinental flights, Beirut; all were more martyrs than captives in any political cause. This cause has no legitimacy except as vicious crimes against humanity.
Where are the demonstrations against such barbarism? Where are those who protest such abuse of human rights? Where are the peace demonstrators, the new left, the voices of amnesty, the priests and ministers and imams, the feminists, the rock stars and movie stars, civil liberties lawyers, all fighters for human rights? Where are all the voices against predatory behavior? Why such silence? Same as child molesters, rapists, muggers, murderers, are a pariah on society and must be stopped, so must these abductors of innocent human beings be stopped. No society can coexist with its predators, no matter what their political or religious beliefs, or that society will surely fail. These brutal primitives must be stopped, their funding cut off, and their news coverage restricted, for they revel in cruelty and ugliness, reveling in their victim's blood.
For the sake of these who had been martyred, both the Arab and non-Arab world must speak out. This is not a religious war, it is not jihad, it is simply murder, an excessive criminality reveling in the blood of innocents, of men and women and children who were murdered in some primitive pre-biblical butchery. They are the martyrs, martyred for being human beings. They died because they were not part of any cause, other than being alive, trying to help, to learn, to build a better world. The predators stopped them. Now it is time to speak out against these primitive predators, and to stop them.
Those who would protest that bombs kill too must remember that the vicious primitives hide behind the innocent, behind women and children, using them as human shields. The martyred men and women and children were innocents who died same as did the human shields. They are all martyrs of innocence.
Humancafe.com - editorial staff
----------------------------------------------------------------
--edited 9/28/04--
* There is wonderful news! The two Italian women were released unharmed, Allah be praised, the Merciful, the Compassionate. May this good fortune, and act of mercy by their abductors, be also the news for the two French journalists and the Briton engineer, may they be released soon. We can only pray.
Sadly, it was too late for the others who were brutally killed, Martyrs of Innocence.
By Ivan A. on Friday, September 24, 2004 - 01:01 am:
When beautiful human beings are destroyed
You want to scream "Stop this!"
In every soul, every smile, there is the Beauty.
For God's sake, for the love of humanity,
Do not do this!
Do not destroy the beauty,
Of each woman, each man, of Life.
In the promise of every child,
Is the hope of eternity.
Bring back the life,
Bring them back from the abyss,
Of Death.
Ivan
By Ivan A. on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 - 12:34 pm:
This is wonderful news! Thank God there is still mercy in the world.
Their innocence is vindicated. Simona Pari and Simona Torretta are released. Let us pray for all the others.
Ivan
By Eds. on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 - 01:10 pm:
UN attacks Italy's refugee policy
This BBC News article clearly shows there is a massive human tragedy, and violation of human rights, caused by smugglers of human beings, capitalizing on their social plight with promises of a better life in Europe. Most arrive illegally on boats to the nearest point, the Italian island of Lampedusa, where they overwhelm the holding capacity of the refugee camp there, making it unsanitary and unsafe for the arrivals already there. But is this not a problem for the United Nations, to curb such human trafficking by unscrupulous smugglers of human beings? Rather than leveling criticism at Italian authorities, this should be a golden opportunity for the UN to take the matter into its own hands and set up their own holding camps for the unfortunate victims of human smuggling. Why do they not do this, and offer only a whine instead? Is the UN inept at handling massive human crisises of this sort, where through misfortune criminal gangs profit in human trafficking?
That humans beings can be so desperate as to surrender themselves to human smugglers is a tragedy of our modern times, but their choice to do so must be honored. It is this choice, perhaps a very bad one since it invites their coercion, which allows them to be treated as virtual slaves of the smugglers; many of whom will perish on the risky voyage by sea, or dumped into a foreign land, on any of Europe's shores. This human trafficking is an international violation of antislavery laws and must be addressed by both all of the European Union and the United Nations, and not left to the distress of individual nations. It is an open door for the UN to show what it can do to handle this tragedy. To date, it has failed to provide facilities, holding camps in either Europe or Africa, where this human tragedy can be addressed. The UN's only response had been criticism of how overwhelmed Italian officials responded to this human trafficking crisis, by sending them back to their origin point of human smuggling.
It is for the United Nations to stop this illegal human trafficking in order to protect the refugees' human rights.
Humancafe.com
By Ivan A. on Friday, October 8, 2004 - 10:35 am:
Kenyan ecologist wins Nobel prize
This is great news for a worthy woman and an inspiration for the people of Africa, and the world, in the cause of peace and Earth's ecology. Congratulations to Mrs Maathai, well done!
By Ivan A. on Sunday, October 10, 2004 - 12:25 pm:
Fast change in the UAE
Afghan vote boycott 'crumbling'
Somalia's presidential hopefuls
In pictures: Afghanistan votes
Why would they be any different from the rest of the world? Economic freedom, democratic rule of law, women's right, as all indicative of a world based on agreement rather than coercion. Of course their world will embrace these new Earth ideals, they only make sense for a better life. Arabs and the people of Islam are no different from the rest of the world, even if there is presently friction between their traditional religion and its eventual secularization, as had already happened in the West. Things change. This is right on towards a better world, for all of us.
On the same day's BBC news there is also those who would still kill:
Suicide blast kills 17 in Baghdad
Let's see how the voter turnout is in Iraq when the elections are held in January. There may be hope yet, if the turnout is like the Afghani one. The killers are out of step with history, and suicidal, because their way is coming to an end.
Maybe the news from Baghdad will be more like the news from Kandahar:
Afghan officials hail Kandahar poll
Insh'Allah, God Willing.
Ivan
By Humancafe on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 12:51 pm:
This thought provoking BBC News article is about how Islam will evolve within the context of the internet and European-western society. Will it lead to 'balkanisation' dominated by religious 'village strong men', or will it be through dialogue of modern tolerant minds? Have Muslin scholars addressed this question with a view to make a better world, or are they battling for the minds and souls of their youth for another agenda? Are human rights, our inherent freedoms as human beings, addressed by moderate elements, or will radicalization dominate future events, even within societies who had prided themselves on openness and tolerance of diverse cultures? Which will 'win' in the end: coercion, or understanding and agreement? If coercion dominates, then the future is grim. It will be at the hands of future young people, and old, to guide their world towards more tolerance of diversity without imposing their inherent coercions on others. Nor can an 'enemy' be allowed to live as potential predators from within, for no society can last long without controlling its predators.
By abe on Friday, December 31, 2004 - 10:40 pm:
The Palestinian Christian is an endangered species. When the modern state of Israel was established there were about 400000 of us. Two years ago the number was down to 80000. Now it’s down to 60000. At that rate, in a few years there will be none of us left. When this happens non Christian groups will move into our churches and claim them for ever. I FEAR THAT WHEN/IF THE LAST PALESTINIAN CHRISTIAN LEAVES EXTREME GROUPS WILL MOVE INSTANTLY TO OUR CHURCHES AND SCHOOLS AND HAVE A FIELD DAY HATCHING WORLD PLOTS. IT WOULD BE TOO LATE FOR BUSH (OR KERRY) TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT !!
Palestinian Christians within Israel fare little better. On the face of it, their number has grown by 20000 since 1991. But this is misleading, for the census classification ‘Christian’ includes some 20000 recent non-Arab migrants from the former Soviet Union.
So why are Palestinian Christians abandoning their homeland?
We have lost hope, that’s why. We are treated as non-people. Few outside the Middle East even know we exist, and those who do, conveniently forget.
I refer, of course, to the American Religious Right. They see the modern Israel as a harbinger of the Second Coming, at which time Christians will go to Paradise, and all others (presumably including Jews) to Hell. To this end they lend military and moral support to Israel.
Even by the double-dealing standards of international diplomacy this is a breathtakingly cynical bargain. It is hard to know who is using whom more: the Christian Right for offering secular power in the expectation that the Jewish state will be destroyed by a greater spiritual one; or the Israeli Right for accepting their offer. What we do know is that both sides are abusing the Palestinians. Apparently we don’t enter into anyone’s calculations.
The views of the Israeli Right, and extremists affiliated with other religions, are well known: they want us gone.
Less well known are the views of the American Religious Right. Strangely, they find the liberation of Iraqis from a vile dictator just, but do not find it unjust for us to be under military occupation for 38 long years. Said Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma): ‘God Appeared to Abraham and said: “I am giving you this land,”the West Bank. This is not a political battle at all. It is a contest over whether or not the word of God is true.’
House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas) was even more forthright: ’I'm content to have Israel grab the entire West Bank… I happen to believe that the Palestinians should leave.’
There is a phrase for this. Ethnic cleansing.
So why do American Christians stand by while their leaders advocate the expulsion of fellow Christians? Could it be that they do not know that the Holy Land has been a home to Christians since, well… since Christ?
Do not think I am asking for special treatment for Christians. Ethnic cleansing is evil whoever does it and to whomever it is done. Palestinian Christians: Anglican, Maronite Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Armenians, Baptists, Copts and Assyrians have been rubbing shoulders with each other and with other religions: Muslims, Jews, Druze and (most recently) Baha’is for centuries. We want to do so for centuries more. But we can’t if we are driven out by despair.
We are equally frightened by those who commit suicide bombings.None of us Christians have condoned it or even contemplated the idea. Our commitment to Jesus teachings will never shake our resolve in this matter.
What we seek is support: material, moral, political and spiritual. As Palestinians we grieve for what we have lost, and few people (the Ashkenazi Jews are one) have lost more than us. But grief can be assuaged by the fellowship of friends.
Abe
By Ivan A. on Sunday, March 20, 2005 - 12:43 pm:
Why haven't aliens from another world talked to us?
I'm taking this question from an interesting discussion on BAD Astronomy forum titled: "Aliens won't talk to us. Why?" The twenty one points mentioned as a summary of why give three categorical reasons: Technical, sociological, and philosophical. The technical can be summed up as "we're out of the tech loop" so we cannot hear them and they cannot hear us. The sociological is summed as "non parity between civilizations", so they ignore us. The philosophical says "our belief systems are too different". So this leads to the question of how can we make them understand that we are ready to talk, assuming "they" actually exist; or perhaps are we really ready to talk to them at all?
So talk to us, aliens. If you had been observing us, collectively, since human like apes first conquered fire and began making stone tools, which may demark when we became modern human beings, you may have seen us from those early days when we separated from the ape family tree. Of course, if you are less advanced than we are, we will not hear from you, perhaps for thousands if not millions of years. But if we are less advanced than you, and you have full space travel and communications capability, you have the technical advantage over us, so we might hear from you. Assuming that if you are more advanced and have that advantage, then the fact that we had not heard from you may lead us to think that you are not an aggressive race. If you were, one would suppose, we would have known by now, either as slaves or food, or we would had been made extinct. No alien colonies exist on Earth that we know of, so we must assume by default that you are not coercively aggressive. This leaves only the possibility that if you exist, and are advanced enough, you chose to leave us alone.
Perhaps you see us as not yet ready. We are coercive, have the ability to do great harm to ourselves and others, still engage in wars though there are efforts to minimize these by international agreements, and we certainly still find sport in killing others, as our films portray. So perhaps you see us as still too primitive, a collective world of criminals, to join in with you. Our technological advancements, though impressive to ourselves, may appear crude and simple to you. Can a new breakthrough in physics or space travel, and communications, make a difference here? And then there is the matter of our planet's collective will. Many people doubt there are aliens, so that those who see flying saucer like ships are ridiculed. If you are sworn to non-interference with our world, why do we see them, if they exist? Are some of you less careful about that? Do you have a hierarchical chain of command, so that those at the lowest rungs, the ones observing us, may have to ask for permission from higher up before they can respond to our call? (I actually once had a dream about that, where your rain making machines were spotted giving rain to flocks of sheep, and when discovered you had a momentary panic in how to deal with it!) The chain of command is one way to rechannel aggression and keep things under control, same as we use in our military structures, where aggression is what the military is all about. Is this a universal structure used by all the other worlds? Or is it on your world that obedience is subservient to freedom by agreements? We like to think that we are making it thus in ours, though falteringly.
Then there is the matter of sanctity of life. Is your world built around a principle that all life is sacred, and especially human life? If so, since we do not always observe this, killing animals for food and killing each other too, then you might think we are not ready to be talked to. Is this holding you back, so all you do is observe us from a distance? Are there any humans on Earth worth talking to? And if at some point you decide yes, it is okay to talk to some, how will you go about doing this? Secret meetings? That may be against your principle of openness and truth. A general communications with us might alarm our governments and church leaders. What religion would stand up to a revelation that we had not been alone, a favored planet in the eyes of God, and that there are civilizations out there galore? I can see your dilemma here, especially since any hint that you might exist is quickly squelched by our government authorities with denials, or by scientific authorities with ridicule. So perhaps this alone gives you reason to think that we simply are not yet ready? Valid point.
So what road is open to us to establish a communications link with you? Firstly, stop killing each other, and respect all life? Second, stop ridiculing the idea that other civilizations exist, to show good faith? Third, reign in coercive behaviors with some disciplined structure showing that we are not primitive savages? Agreements work by far better than coercions in how society works, as per our social agreements, our laws, and our respect for truthfulness and honoring contracts of agreements. So we had not proven ourselves capable of this at any level of acceptance by you? Lastly, it is technical. We are backwards technologically, so are not yet ready for space, though we have had some little successes, such as getting to our moon, and getting probes out into the solar system. Not enough? Do we need to pass some test of competence before approached? I suspect this may be the least important reason for your silence, and that the others listed above are far more dominant.
So we remain in the dark. We still do not see life as each living thing a universe unto itself, so crush it when it is convenient for us. We destroy natural habitats, pollute our oceans to where coral and oceanic life cannot breathe, kill our rivers, cut down our living forests for wooden toys... I can see your point! Some religions, such as Buddhism did see each life as precious, but for wrong reasons; they did not want to crush a reincarnated relative who came back as a bug! So our philosophical developments may appear crude, though we had progressed some from when we first tamed fire. In a million years, we hope to be better than now, but for now, this aggressive dysfunctional civilization you see, one that might even destroy the ecosystem of its world to where we will not be able to breathe, is what you have to work with. Not much can be done to save us from ourselves, but perhaps some clue that we are not all alone in the universe may give us a new impetus to want to do better. If for no other reason, if you had been observing our slow progress for the past million years, can you at least give us a hint on how we can get over this little hump in our path? Send it to us in a collective dream, if you will, that we want to become better than we are now, not such primitive savages, and perhaps you will like the results. I for one think that we are ready, but we simply do not yet know we are.
Ivan D. Alexander
Earth, 3rd planet from our star, near the edge of our galaxy.
Ps: Of course, if your watching us is like us watching animals in the wild, then maybe you haven't found it worth talking to... valid point.
By Anonymous on Sunday, April 17, 2005 - 11:41 pm:
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, May 29, 2005 - 09:03 pm:
I found it a breath of fresh air in an otherwise bland universe of thought.
Having fought Al Queda and its allies and been the target of assination attempts I am well aquainted with the type of world that the extremists would build...one where websites like this would no longer be allowed....
I have seen much over the course of my career, to include much folly and ingorance in what is supposed to be our vaulted intelligence and military system of systems that has inadvertently contributed to much misery in this world...conversely I have seen our military and intelligence services pull off miracles that have kept the peace and furthered the cause of civilization....of the miracles and failures I have been part of both...
During the Cold War I and others saw what was to come in the former Yugosolvia but the attitude that prevailed at the time was that it was immaterial to our interests...it used to be a running joke at the CIA and DIA that we put the least capable personnel in charge of those regions because it was more important to have the best facing the Soviets and if you screwed up on a Soviet Desk you would be demoted to the Balkins....
Time passed and 100,000 or more died...and then we took and interest...
Again time passed and we are faced with a crisis in Dafur with millions facing death and starvation...again we saw what was going to happen but it was immaterial to our interests and the region was assigned to the least capable analysts...I watched as a Lt Colonel faced with information about Dafur flounder as what to do with it....being a small minded man his inclination was to transfer it or ensure it got lost in the system so he could not be held responsible for doing something about...a typical beaurcratic reaction.....he was not an evil man just a man over his head and fearful of losing his career over an issue he saw as immaterial to our interests...
Again time passes and now millions face death....
In all of these cases one wonders what they would have done if faced with the challange of knowing that something was going to happen and having the responsibility of doing something about it....
Most of us I suspect would act much like the LT Colonel I saw flounder with the information he had at hand....
Until we all develop the courage that was displayed by the young soldier at who broke the story of Abu Graib...I suspect our world will be beset by much misery....and our progress towards an integrated peaceful global society slowed as we battle religious extremists whose cause is aided by things like Abu Graib....
A few words on some things that they don't put in the history books.....
By Ivan A. on Sunday, June 12, 2005 - 08:05 pm:
On the other hand, there is much to find fault in other cultures. Cannibalism in DR Congo is not a virtue, where pygmies are eaten by soldiers if they fail to deliver game, or worse, they eat their children. Women kept in a state of perpetual servitude, without rights and in some place not only without voice but even without a driver's license, are not virtues. Slavery, where some human beings are in total bondage to others, often children and as often women for sex trade, are not virtues. Violence and violation of women, rape, husbands beating their wives with impunity, (dis)honor killings. Suicide bombings to kill non-combatant civilians, often children, are not virtues. Jihad, to kill all those who are deemed non-believers, is a horror, worse than our films' stupid preoccupation with violence and murder, for there are those who claim to know what is an "un-believer". How dare they? By what right can they judge another whether or not they are loved by God, and love God in return? God has many names, so by what right:? Absurd, primitive, and in so many ways more evil than the stupidities of our culture.
So let him raise the first stone against the "evil" of another, and look deep into his or her own soul, and see what is truly there. What? Pride? Servitude? Ignorance? Hate? Fear? Before that stone is cast, look deep into your soul and ask, how many people have you helped? To whom had you done elevating things to raise them above you rather than brining them down to you? For whom have you given your love? Then, if you are satisfied, throw that stone. But if you do, mind, stones come back the other way. That is the way of the Universe, that stone will come back at you.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, June 12, 2005 - 09:03 pm:
There is hope yet...I have witnessed much in the course of my life and will see much yet to come....I am not sure if you saw the posting I made about the same time as yours....If we are going to break the cycle of violence and progress what Jesus Christ taught us is to lead by example...hence your statements regarding his words on casting stones...
When we descend to the same level as the terorists or fail to take action to confront evil...we fail the great test....When faced with the stoning Jesus made his historical statement that has echoed through eternity....
I knew what they were doing to the prisoners at Guantanamo...the use of water torture and the like as documented in the Times Magazine article two very brave ex CIA men that will remain nameless told me what DOD interagators where doing...they both found God and left the agency...one lived through the Beuruit Bombing of the Marine Barracks and awoke in the smoking rubble...the other steped outside CIA Headquarters after witnessing the revolution that brought down the Romanian government and and almost died protecting his Romanian operatives from the mob...his cover blown he went to Langley and as he walked out the door a bolt of lighting from a clear sky shattered a tree before him...it put his feet on a path to God....he lived in Iran for as a agent for a while and learned to love the common people of Iran and the Zorastrians who were much oppressed...
There is hope and the children of Islam are very forgiving....they also remember their friends...
Respectfully
Ed Chesky
PS I don't sleep very well as you can imagine...23 years of secrets and seeing things takes a toll I take it day by day. I had hoped that we could tame the demons we created and/or angered in GITMO I am not sure that is possible any more
By Anonymous on Monday, June 13, 2005 - 12:15 am:
Edward Chesky
By Anonymous on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 12:38 pm:
Clean government is the issue here: Iran hardliners pray for victory , where rooting out corruption with a hardline conservative religious agenda is favored as the means over humanistic liberal reforms. This may appear a throwback from the point of view of more progressive human rights proponents, but it may be the necessary "means to an end" for those countries where corruption at all levels of society are a fact of life. We should not be quick to judge, though the step backwards may be regrettable it may be the correct way for those societies, especially where the level of education is low and the habit of deceit is high, as the best way to correct these social dysfunctions. Time is lost in joining the rest of humanity's more progressive ideas, and no doubt more educated members of society will suffer for their liberal views, but that may the reality of where they live. Until they can reign in gross coercions and deceit, that is where they're at.
Killings, suicide bombings, payoffs, racketeering, corrupt civil and government officials, are part and parcel of the intellectual poverty experienced by many parts of the world, not only less developed nations but economically advanced as well. BBC news has good coverage of these developments, and Arab media should as well, to educate their people who labor under the terrible weight of these social dysfunctions and coercions.
By Ivan A. on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 01:48 pm:
This article from BBC News shows the serious side of an African's point of view of Africa's problems. Debt may, and should, be forgiven; aid doubled; medicines and food find their ways to the most impoverished victims. But will this be a solution, or but one more reason for gangs and gang like governments to wrestle for power through more war? G8 may end subsidies to their own domestic farmers, which should help, but can the economies of Africa function normally in an environment of corruption and intimidatiion by the powerful over the weak? It may not be merely a war of tribalism, but more a war of coercions, of deceitful and unlawful human nature for some of the people of the continent.
Remember, we are all descendents of Africa. Why should some of us be so much better off than others? It is not a problem of Africa, but a problem of human conduct.
By Anonymous on Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - 11:31 am:
By Anonymous on Thursday, July 7, 2005 - 01:47 pm:
The insane mind is hard to reason, so how do we understand a primitively insane mind capable of barbaric acts of terrorsim against innocent civilians, such as happened already in New York and Madrid, and today in London? Is there any reason to such insanity?
777. This seems to be the number the insane found thrilling . Like the primitive mind, insanity may relish in odd esoteric numerology couched in superstitions and magic. Perhaps 777 is a special message to their evil god, or from him, to goad them into believing that this magic number falls on the day when they are to display their primitive savagery. The seventh day of the seventh month, in the year 2005, which adds numerlogically to 7, they found their diabolical symbol of the day. This is reminiscent of the biblical 666, symbol of the supposed devil, another primitive symbolism. The fact that this day is at the time of the G8 meeting in Scoltand perhaps reinforced their insanity, regretable only that it was not a G7 meeting, since G is the seventh letter of the English speaking alphabet.
Is there reasoning with the insane? Can some strange magical symbolism appeal to the primitive minds enamoured with the devil? Is barbarsim a human curse visited upon us in modern times by those disaffected with accomplsihments of humankind? The G8 is meeting to address hunger and poverty and disruptions of human caused climate changes. The insane see this with glee, as a time to cause havoc and barbaric acts against innocent well meaning human beings. How do you reason with such violently sick minds?
You don't. They are beyond reason, and like a social cancer, needs to be dealt with surgically, and cut out.
By Anonymous on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 11:43 am:
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - 12:16 am:
I wrote elsewhere on a forum that there really is no choice. Which way Islam?
Female mutilation, jihad, death fatwahs, beheadings. It's not a pretty picture Islam has carved out for itself in this world. Why are they so different from the rest of humanity, and not more like us?
If a faith is so dominated by hatreds and fears that it resembles the opposite of what the original intent of the teachings was all about, "peace and compassion", then it is time for the followers of that faith to take a long hard look at themselves. Why are they not more like their compassionate offsprings the Baha'is, for example, or the reform movements in Judaism and Christianity, or tolerant like Buddhists? Why are they absent from the world scene of ecology, health, fighting HIV, fighting hunger, poverty, preservation of animal species, plant species, or in a dialogue for human rights? As a group, I am sure the people of Islam are every bit as intelligent as anyone else on the planet. But why had they become so conspicuously absent from a positive side of world events? Instead, they find themselves criticized harshly for terrorism, accused of brutality towards women, or as supporters of teachings that are poles apart from the progressive developments, such as our human freedoms. So they find themselves on the extreme negative side of world events. I don't expect Islamists to become "neo-Protestants", but they certainly have a lot of room for improvement. What Islamic nation can be held up as a shining example for the world? Saudi Arabia? The world's oil is there, but it was there for hundreds of millions of years. Iran? They have nuclear technology, but their progressiveness was attacked from within by their religious powerbase, and thus likely distrusted by the rest of the world. Maybe Turkey? They're the closest to western ideas, have a manufacturing base, but are also under attack by fundamentalists from within. Zanzibar? No. Egypt? With their exceptionally rich history and scholarship, maybe. Algeria, Morocco, Lybia, Tunisia, Yemen? It is hard to see what these countries had contributed to the world in the past 500 years. Iraq for now is a big question mark.
So is "Jihad!" a war cry of victory? Or is rather a cry of desperation? I think the latter, and they know it. Same as the cruelty and repression of the Catholic Inquisition of the Middle Ages was stopped, the Church felt then threatened by modern ideas, so will it be with today's fundamentalist Islamists. The Inquisition ended, and the Church changed, because it had to. And so is it with this newly violent Islamism, because it has to come to an end. They know this, and we know this. As they look around, they know they had been left behind, and rather badly. It is for this reason they are not on the world stage of progressive development, so their presence is known only through horrific negative attention. The beheadings, kidnappings, suicide killings, are all part of that negative side, just like wayward children craving attention. They are not to be feared, but they must be contained, same as delinquent children must be contained from their violence. Nor is this lost on the true intellectuals of Islam, but with death fatwahs they are silenced, like Salman Rushdi. Not only silenced, but desperate, because they cannot see how change can come about to bring progressive change to their world. And yet, being part of this world, change they will, because they can, because they must. In the end, they have to embrace a world built up of respectful social and personal agreements, built on honesty and trust, rather than ruled by repression, by coercions built on violence and fear. That is where the West, however imperfect in its Enlightenment and modern instituted freedoms, has surpassed them.
So this recent manifestation of Islam, its truly ugly side, is not to be feared, nor is it to be pitied. But nor can it be ignored, because it must be addressed. This is part of Islam's necessary self evaluation, what it has to undergo to re-examine itself, to search its soul for what it truly believes. Ultimately it has to change for the better because it must. Call me an optimist, but I believe the good people in Islam will win. They have no other way, otherwise it's self destruction, which becomes a cultural suicide. The death of a rich and fine tradition of Islam, which once had a great history, would be regrettable not only because I was fond of reading Richard Burton's "Arabian Nights", or Charles Doughty's "Arabia Deserta", but because I had known some truly fine people in their world. They have to win this new battle within themselves, for the good of all their children and all posterity. I think the real "Jihad" will be when Islam can turn away from violence and reform itself from within, into the image of a progressive, sensitive both socially and individually, universally tolerant, finely spiritual and compassionate; and free in expression of what is the beauty of being human, man or woman, Muslim or not. And that, when they succeed, will be their fine contribution to their heritage, and to all posterity.
The way the game is stacked, Islam has no choice but to evolve. Can it happen peaceably? That would be a God given gift. In truth, because it is their fight, we cannot know this. But it can start small, first in countries that are already amenable to change, and gradually migrating with these ideas of peace and compassion, and of human agreement, to the rest. Perhaps, Insh'allah, it can be Iraq, where the Shias remove decades of animosity from the Sunnis, and incorporate a progressive ideology into how they run their affairs. Still, one should expect resistance to change, especially from those whose power base is eroded due to progressively modern ideas. Think of ancient Islam as a fiefdom, or sheikdom, where the subservient serve and obey, same as it was in the lordships of ancient Europe. Russia is still in that mindset, the old Boyar fiefdoms having morphed into mafia like orders, which may be why it is finding it difficult to adjust to a post Soviet era. Expect the same from within the Islamic world. But the game is set, and change is set to manifest in time. Whether it is relatively painless or filled with strife, in the manner of the old Catholic and Protestant wars, will depend upon their new leadership. If they embrace the philosophy of agreement over the regressiveness of coercion, then it may happen very quickly indeed. This is how it stacks up within Habeas Mentem, that the evolution of human consciousness is towards greater agreement, by instituted laws of agreements, and ultimately into a greater peace. This evolution is towards a greater awareness, enlightenment, planetwide. All we can do who are not part of this struggle is watch, and offer aid where we can. Certainly, we must keep that struggle at a distance. It truly is their fight.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - 06:50 am:
I can understand your frustration as you watch the world of Islam. To see things like the adoption of Islamic Law into the Constitution of Iraq and the step backward it is for woman's rights and freedom is hard to comprehend.
Despite the blood and treasure we have spent in Iraq it is clear the people of Islam are reluctant to change.
All we can do is hope for the best, and take with a grain of salt the spin we are getting out of Washington DC lately on how much progress is being made in Iraq and the Middle East. I recommend that you read a book called the Haj. Once you read it I think you will have a better understanding of what is going on in the World of Islam.
For years I was a military planner that developed targeting campaign plans that would have killed millions. I was very good at it which is why there were a number of attempts on my life and why Al Qeada and others want to kill me. During the first Gulf War I assisted in the killing of thousands of Iraqi soldiers that pulled out of Kuwait on the Highway of death. When I walked the ground afterward the corpses of the dead were burned into carbon ashes from the heat of the munitions we used.
I never really thought about it until I almost died. Unlike Islam Christianity offered me an alternative
By Edward Chesky on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - 11:44 am:
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/world/iraq
Iraq secularists denounce "Islamist" constitution
By Edward Chesky on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - 01:16 pm:
I direct you to the following Website
http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=210
I sat in a command center after providng advise on supression of Air Defenses and Iraqi Air Defense Capability and watched on close circuit television as we bombed the columne on the Highway of Death. Then I walked the ground.
Since that day I have been hunted by Islamic militants for that and other reasons. PANAM 103 over Lockerbee was to have been my death at the end of the Cold War.
I have since renounced killing after almost dying myself and picked up my compass and ruler again to teach the world a lesson in geometry and the appropriate application of intelligence in support of predictive analysis.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - 06:55 pm:
Iraq war approaching the tipping point
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3379C496-BA09-4CDE-A93E-2B36DCF7F36E.htm
I note that this assessment is published on Al Jazeera and broadcast throughout the Middle East. This asessment is picked up by the Islamic Militants all around the middle east and is used to drive strategy and operations.
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 - 10:36 pm:
(Cross posted from Can Democracy Be "Imposed"?, the Examine Life forums.)
Do you mean like Dr. V's eye clinic, India, which has helped millions see again, two-thirds of them for free, and was inspired by the efficiency methods of McDonald's fast foods, so their doctors each perform 100 eye cataract operations per day? Even the creators of America's, and soon the world's, proverbial "double bellied fat slob" can offer something good, if handled in a proper spiritual way. I never eat there myself, but then I live in the land of "frutis and nuts". I'd lift a pint of Guiness to good health!.. chased down by fresh squeezed carrot juice... and a good cigar. J
Quote:
Getting back to the original:
It depends upon whom you talk to in Iraq. For some, the fall of Saddam's hated regime is a golden opportunity to start afresh, to make something of the country other than another oppressive regime founded on fear, torture, brutality, and murder. Both of Saddam's sons were legend butchers, now dead. The winds of progress can blow in Iraq, sans WMD's Dr. Germ, and the thousands of Iraqis killed by poison gas. Will the Iraqi people grab this opportunity, an accident of history if you will, given Bushie went to war for the wrong reasons? Or will they simply once again capitulate to some strong armed political force that will push them back into repression and tyranny? It is an interesting historical time, and who can predict the future?
Quote:
Remember also that the comparison between the war against Japan and Germany versus the war in Iraq is starkly different. In WW II, American lives were lost at a rate of about 100,000 per year; in Iraq, for all our protests against it, American lives are lost at the rate of about 1,000 per year, though a grievous loss nevertheless. But these two figures are a huge difference. So the wars have absolutely no comparison. Further, the invasion of Iraq was to depose a dubious character, perhaps for dubious reasons, who will not be missed; the invasion of Germany was to get rid of a truly monstrous character, with very good reason to invade. Saddam was no Hitler, though he might have imagined himself an Arab Napoleon, but rather failed at that. Democracy came to Germany, and Japan, rather easily. It may not come so easily to Iraq, or any country in the Arab world, but then again, history may surprise us. We do not know the future. The chips may fall either way, towards a constitutional multi-party democracy, or towards a single party authoritarian theocracy. We won't be happy with the second choice, and may yet be disappointed by the format of the first. Or maybe not. So.... How about if we let the Iraqi people decide? Isn't that what democracy is all about?
Now that it is done, and Iraq was invaded, Saddam deposed, our purpose is no more than merely maintaining sufficient social order until the Iraqi people decide their fate. And even that is proving unbelievably difficult. (Note that any successes in Iraq, schools, hospitals, rebuilt infrastructure, training, are not celebrated in the popular media, and you have to really hunt for good works being done by our men and women in Iraq, whether by English or Italian or Americans or Japanese there; this an unfortunate bias of the press.) But once the people of Iraq had decided, we have absolutely no business being there, oil or no oil. Then it is up to their government, their military and police, and their people to make a go of it. If they succeed, then a wonderful thing had happened, just as in Japan's and Germany's history changed for the better. But if they fail, and democracy cannot take root in Iraq, but rather rots instead, then that's their history. We cannot force the hand of history into the future.
Personally, from this little obscure forum, I wish them every success.
Ivan
By Ivan A. on Sunday, October 16, 2005 - 11:41 am:
Yuschenko Talking Point, on BBC News (audio), talks about Ukraine's Orange Revolution. Freedom comes at a high price, a necessary price, which will inspire all peoples in the world who desire freedom and democracy in the future. Eight hundred years later, Ukraine is finally a free European nation. May they find the vision and the wisdom, and will, to carry through a world of lawful agreements, equal for all people, rather than a world still built of coercions and corruption.
God Bless them.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, October 16, 2005 - 11:47 am:
The main issues is that the common people have spoken and said they want change. The nature of the change and its end result is now up to debate. It may be that the final debate on the future of Iraq may have to be settled with blood in a civil war like the United States did over a hundred years ago or it may be settled as a result war of terror like the IRA waged in Northern Ireland.
I suspect that given the nature of the ills that plagued Iraq it will be settled in a war of terrorism that will cost many lives and much treasure.
All we can do is hope for the best and hope the common people rise to meet the challanges facing by their society.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, October 16, 2005 - 11:48 am:
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Sunday, October 16, 2005 - 02:57 pm:
Though the vote is not yet in, there are already indications it's a "yes", even Condi Rice thinks so.
Ed, per yours:
I think so too. It is time for change, in Iraq as well as other parts of the world. We cannot continue to base our future actions on millennium old thinking, about what "God said", etc. Back then, men did the best they knew how with very limited information to make sense of the world. Today we know much more. But if God set up the Rules of Life for us humans to play in His game, then it is not up to God, acting as refree and umpire. i.e., Reality, to suddenly change the rules as we go along. As we get more information, become less ignorant of what Life and the universe are all about, then we are not changing the rules but merely understanding them better. I think the fault goes back to the Hebrews in their Old Testament, that they had God interfering with their destiny, on their behalf of course, to favor them as the "chosen people". But that would entail God playing favorites, and like an umpire changing the rules as the game goes along, contradicting His own Rules of Life, this is unrealistic. We are not destined to be "chosen" in any way except to better learn how to deal with life, with each other, and with all things. For Islamists to also think they're the "chosen ones" regarding God's Word is a throwback to those ancient erroneous Hebrew beliefs, when we were much less informed, that God plays favorites. That is simply not so.
Quote:
The main issues is that the common people have spoken and said they want change...
What will result from our future actions based upon our current understanding is either a world better suited to human consciousness, and survival, or not. I think the democratic process is one step in the right direction, same as the Iraqis chose, but not in itself the final step. But once taken, it opens the doors for future better understandings, agreements, and interhuman relations that are progressive and positive, meaning we don't keep killing each other, so that a brighter future can occur planetwide. This is the future Iraqis, and Ukrainians, are envisioning in their votes for change. I think this is a very positive step.
Then again, Ed, Iraq may go the way of Basra, this way, where the repressive elements gain upper hand. Sad, but I would not get my hopes up too much on Iraqi democracy quite yet. They've got a long way to go.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, October 16, 2005 - 11:00 pm:
Ed
By Ivan A. on Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 11:12 am:
I will present this not in philosophical terms, which make more sense only to us, but in the wording used by those who are truel believers:
(Taken from same presentation on the Examined Life Philosophy Discussion: "War on Terror-2- or Pacifying Islam?" where the intent is to show how Islam can advance "world peace" without resort to conquest.)
I had been thinking about "progressive revelation", which is a tenet of Islamic thought, that each prophet of the great world religions is a successor to prior prophets, to give the teachings for mankind appropriate for its time. Here is considered only Judaism, Christianity, and Islam since they all stem from the same root of the ancient Hebrew religion, of One God; so Hinduism and Buddhism is not involved, since they hail from a different tradition of beliefs, though they often overlap with the teachings of the prophets. But if these three can be reduced to their basic common denominator, of which Mohammed is believed to be the "seal of the prophets", hence the last in succession, there should be a natural progression of their teachings. In thinking about it, I think the following is an appropriate distillation of these three great world religious faiths:
1. Judaism-Hebrew: God loves the world and humanity.
2. Christian-Jesus: Love one another as God loves you.
3. Islam-Mohammed: God is merciful and compassionate.
So the natural progression is from God loving humankind and the world, to His infinite mercy and compassion, per Christ's teachings that we are to love one another. It follows that if these prophets are in the same line of progression to form the world's great religions, then it should also follow that there is no exclusiveness for any of God's infinite love for humanity, in all its forms. These are the basic tenets of this progressive revelation. If there is a common factor to all three, it is the Golden Rule, which all three believe in:
Do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you.
But this rule is poorly worded, in that some dysfunctional human beings may not fit the pattern, for example sado-masochists or nympho-child molestors, since they would want to have done onto themselves what they do unto others. So a better wording, I think, would be for this same Rule:
Do only through agreement, and do not force coercion.
It is the same rule, but worded in better language. In ancient times, when slavery was accepted, the prior wording was best; but in today's modern age where slavery is forbidden, the latter is more true to the spirit.
So if all three religions accept this basic premise of God's love for humanity in His infinite compassion, and that we love one another in the same way, then it follows that per the Golden Rule, we do not force each other against our agreement, against our will, into coercion; because this would be contrary to God's progressive dictates for humanity.
The reason I bring up this line of reasoning is that in the Islamic tenet of "God mandated Jihad" against all infidels, to force conversion or kill all who do not believe in the religion as presented by the last prophet, Mohammed; this coercion goes against God's progressive teachings to humanity, that God's love is also how we are to love one another, within the Golden Rule of His infinite mercy and compassion. If this were not true, that if instead of the Golden Rule a jihadic war on the infidels is mandated by God, then it means that Islam is not part of the true progressive revelation. In effect, it means that through Jihad, Islam has fallen out of its predecessors' revelations from God, and thus has failed to obey their religion's earliest foundation: that God loves the world and humanity, and that we love one another. If so, if the Golden Rule is negated, which means that coercion is not contrary to God's teachings and instead is necessary to convert the infidels by force. But that is a flaw in reasoning, because God's first mandate is to spread His love not through coercion but through agreement, per the commonly accepted Golden Rule for humankind. And to force agreement negates the very essence of agreement itself. Therefore, there is a serious disconnect here between Islamic Jihad and progressive revelation, since this call for world coercion to force all human beings into accepting Islam, as the final teachings of God, is contrary to God's love for humanity and the world.
I think this is a key issue in the "pacification" of Islam, that it must face its inherent contradiction in how it perceives both God's love and the very nature of progressive revelation of the successor prophets. Whether or not Mohammed is truly the last prophet for eternity is a moot point, since eternity is a very long time, and it is presumptuous for us humans in the present to assume that we can make such a statement. Moreover, distant history will judge as to which is the "last prophet", not us. Let God decide this. So it falls back to the critical point of whether or not Jihad is true to God's teachings, as revealed by progressive revelation, or is it an error of reasoning? Per the above, it appears that in forcing, in coercing, human beings into accepting the teachings of any of the prophets goes contrary to both God's law of His love, and against the Golden Rule itself; since it forces agreement where it may not always exist. And that resolution is not in the hands of men who claim to have the final say in the matter, but in the hands of each human being who either accepts or rejects the teachings, of their own agreement, of their own God-given "free will". Why? Because God loves them so, and is infinitely compassionate. For any man to take this matter into his own hands, to do Jihad, is then to try to rise above God, which cannot be. In the end, it really is up to God, and not man. We must have faith in God, if we are to be true to the teachings, and not try to rise above Him.
So, even if not a belief totally correct for the modern age, nevertheless the ancient monotheistic Hebraic roots of all these three religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, do share this one thing in common, which is a basic foundation to all three: God loves the world and all humanity. The Jihadist, in his warfare on humanity, is disconnected from this common thread of God's teachings. By Islam's own teachings, Jihad is wrong.
Finally, what of all the other teachings of the holy books of Judaism, Christianity, Islam? That is for men to decide, which teachings are true to God's Love for humanity, and thus true to the Golden Rule, and which teachings are false, because they are inherently coercive. We of the modern age see each human being as sacred, each life sacred, and in this respect, though we may approach this from a purely secular and philosophical perspective, we are more true to the original intent of the progressive teachings of God's Love for humanity than some of the interpretations of existing religions. And when we can differentiate the truth of our teachings from the falsehoods, that will be the path to a true world peace.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 02:47 pm:
WIth regards to Islam wht you are saying is what the Sufi Islamics have argued for centuries is the correct path for Islam. They have been supressed burned, crucified and had their books destroyed.
The tombs of the Sufi Saints in Islam have been desecrated and destroyed but they still endure and strive to change Islam from the inside out.
In this debate it would be helpful to revisit Sufism and their teachings. They provide the bridge that most are seeking with Islam and its transformation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sufi
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 09:27 pm:
Ivan
By echesky on Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 10:01 pm:
I read about the incidents with the COPTIC Christians, I have an interesting website to post about an incident in Egypt where all came together; Jew, Christian and Muslem to view what they thought was a miricle in peace. They left in love honored to have seen it. Since that day the Terrorists and their dogma writers have been in ascendence.
In reviewing the latestest news the head terrorist in Iraq's network has spread to 40 countries. It now rivals Al Quaeda's.
What we have to do is network and support the dissodents in Islam and link them with those striving for change from the inside out. Like setting up underground railroads websites and the rest. If we could build this network and had the political and economic support of the estabishment which presses for real democracy from the outside we have chance of changing Islam.
Hence why I am building a network of old Cold War retired and seperated intelligence operatives to counter Osama and use our skills to promote peaceful change.
Can we do it? Time will tell. Nelson Mandela brought down South Africa peacefully with support from the inside and outside. Our challange is to find Islamics that whant to change and assist them in bringing it about. Knowing that if they are found out they will likely die, just like our deep cover agents in the old Soviet Union did.
Ed Chesky
http://www.theworkofgod.org/Aparitns/Zeitoun.htm
By echesky on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 - 10:40 pm:
Its clear that Chavez is becoming increasingly unstable with regards to religion and thinks the churches are in a conspiracy to oust him.
While vacationing in the area next to Venezuela I managed to expand the old Cold War network into Venezuela in the event a crack down occured to get information in and out of Venezuela and help pull disodents out of the country.
Church groups in Venezuela are fleeing the country out of fear of what Chavez may do. This comes at the heels of his move against major foreign firms located in his country
I have attached a couple of links to articles on this issue. We get a significant amount of our oil from Venezuela and the situation there is becoming increasingly unstable.
Ed Chesky
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051025/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/venezuela_plot_1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051026/us_nm/venezuela_mormons_dc_2
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051025/od_nm/venezuela_dc_1
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000086&sid=akwKpAOp7IwI
http://www.techweb.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=171204458
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 - 12:13 am:
Thanks for the links, will check them out. Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 - 06:10 am:
However the fields of the Central Asian area are not fully developed yet and the lag time to bring production online to meet demand is large.
Chavez is sliding deeper into pychosis and needs medication and treatment he is not getting. Recent studies show that Hispanics as a group have the highest incidence of mental illness of all demographic groups.
Having been pushed to the edge of a complete breakdown due to a life time of stress I have developed a understanding of these types of illnesses. Also having had access to the intelligence fields biographic data base I understand what the psychologists are saying about Chavez.
Mental illness is a serious thing if not treated and we have all the warning signs visible in Chavez, his problems are further compounded as religous leaders like Jessie Jackson feed his delussional state.
The difference between being a political-military-religeous leader and a dillusional maniac is a fine line. History is repleat of what happens when these types of figures get control.
In my case my IQ tests out at 126-130 in certain areas like geometry and other processing functions, hence I get very frustrated with people when I see things like the impending failure of the superdome and things like that. Chevez is sliding down a bad track hence why I did what I did when I was on vactions expanding my network of old Cold War Intelligence types. Most are middle age and older long in the tooth and a bit on the overweight side but still have the skills they developed over a lifetime of being in the intelligence buisness
My Best
Ed Chesky
By echesky on Friday, October 28, 2005 - 08:19 pm:
On Wed I was passed a hand signal and flashed a unwraped Scooter Pie. This was done under video surveillence in a crowd where I work. It was done in a way that the security camera that is used to protect the place I work in could not see it.
The signal was to illustrate that information could be transfered under state of the art surveillence that could not be detected. The information was that Scooter Libby was indicted and would face charges. It was obtained by a decentralized network of agents like Al Qeada but was done to illustrate that their is a global network in place based on up to date CIA signaling techniques and old Knight Templar Organization structures to oppose Al Qeada. This network has penetrated the most secure areas of the world and passes data around the Globe.
The Knight Templars were the only ones to successfully face the Old Cult of Assassins.
Osama can do the same thing as can Saddam from his cell. Nelson Mandela did the same thing from his cell in South Africa.
A teaching point on the use of intelligence
Ed Chesky
By X-post on Saturday, October 29, 2005 - 11:06 am:
(As cross-posted on the Examined Life Philosophy Discussion: Hyping the Role of Islam...) Pepper, thanks for the Carlos (Peace with Realism) reference on Jihad, I will look into it. My reasoning is much simpler however, not a subtlety of fine dialectical reasoning, but rather obtuse:
Where is Jihad in agreement with a principle of respecting human beings, so they are consulted within their agreements; and where is it coercive, so that they are forced against their agreements?
So if Carlos writes:
Is the "lesser" Jihad merely an "informational" jihadic strategy, where the true believers of Islam try to influence the hearts and minds of (in their opinion) non-believers; whereas war (not harb) is to force them because they failed to see the "truth" of their informational teachings? If Islamists can gain followers to their particular interpretation of what is God's will, then they are welcome to communicate this as is anyone of any religion (that's why we have religious tolerance); but when they take it upon themselves to force, coerce, kill, others because they "failed" to believe them, then it is a totally different matter, totally unacceptable to modern human beings, and totally disrespectful of them. That is the difference between the 11th and 21st centuries, and Islamics who are coercive in their 'right and just' jihad better catch up with the past ten centuries, because they had been left behind. And as such, they will be resisted totally, because their coercions are in the same class as ordinary criminal activities. In effect, their jihadic ambitions become a police matter, a criminal activity, pure and simple.
Quote:
As far as I am concerned, being a modern man, we are innocent until proven guilty, and Jihad does not have that maxim in its presentation of its ideas of what is God for humankind. This is not a statement against Islam, which is broad and potentially a beautiful philosophy of life and worship, but rather a statement against the implicitly coercive methodology of Jihad, of forced conversions. I have no problem with what Mohammed allegedly said, or did not say, this is not my problem; but it is my problem if I am forced to believe a certain way. Every day as I live and breath, I am in the presence of God, and for any man to tell me that I am not, that I am going to their version of hell, etc., for me is a great satanic sin, a travesty of human disrespect for my God given right to exist, as a jihadic invasion of my right to my being, the Who I am. And that will be resisted completely, totally, with every breath I take. Nobody has the right to my mind. I'll fight for this. As a free and conscious human being, "Who has a mind", who is innocent of any crimes against other human beings, that is between God and me. And I am quite certain so will every modern (secular) man on this planet, for the right to be Who they are as God created them (not Mohammed created them). We have a right to our individual freedom, our rights and self respect, because they are God (Universe, Mind, Being, Infinity, Mystery, something greater than our ego, etc.) given; my right to be Who I am is a God given right. And Jihad cannot hold a candle to this.
So when apologists for Jihad come out with statements that it is "misunderstood" within a narrow interpretation of extremism, etc., I want to know what they mean. Anon?
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, October 30, 2005 - 07:21 am:
From my discussions about from the examined life Discussion Forums why I never published in a Journel the Solution to the Alhazen's problem which Albrecht Durer came close to doing with compass and ruler.
Albrech Durer was a friend of Martin Luther and loved by him. Martin felt his loss when he died was a loss for all mankind.
Luther used everything in his fight against the Church and Durer supported him with all his genius.
Alhazen's Problem is seen as one of the great achievments of Islam and its contribution to science for me to solve it and then have it used to attack Islam would have been a tragety. Men like Dr Pepper on the Examined life forum would use the solution of the problem like a knife and twist it in the side of Islam.
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Sunday, October 30, 2005 - 10:19 am:
Ivan
By echesky on Sunday, October 30, 2005 - 01:16 pm:
Virilent racist Islamic fearing men and women.
One can only hope that the people of Islam will find their way out of the darkness.
Ed Chesky
By echesky on Monday, October 31, 2005 - 10:09 pm:
In reponse to a posting on another site asking how the Conrad spy ring is linked to the destruction of PANAM 103 it is as follows.
During the Cold War I was, at the age of 26, Chief of Intelligence production for the most advanced and powerful armored division in the world, the 1st AD.
During that time we worked with the West Germans to put in place an agent network across the Iron Curtain to develop on the WARSAW Pact the same data the Conrad Spy Ring was developing on us. This included all of their war plans, deployment locations and command and control facilities. This coupled to signals intelligence from our listening posts in Berlin, Augsberg Germany and from assets in our embassy in Prague allowed us to develop a 90 percent recovery of the WARSAW Pact's War plans.
I was one of the team leaders leading the effort breaking the WARSAW Pacts plans and I was recieving all intelligence traffic related to the effort.
Unknown to us at the time the Soviets and WARSAW Pact had team of agents in Germany doing the same thing to us. The Conrad spy ring. This ring tipped the Soviets and WARSAW Pact as to our efforts. During the course of the operation I noticed indications in signals intelligence that the Soviets and WARSAW Pact were getting up to date copies of our war plans. When I detected this I notifed counter intelligence of the issue and they started an investigation that lead to the breaking of the Conrad Spy Ring.
Unknow to us the Conrad ring or its associated sleeper agents tipped the Soviets and Warsaw pact all of our names and identifications. Like engima in WWII we were reading the Soviets mail. A few of us after Conrad was arrested were scheduled to fly home for Christmas on PANAM 103. Before the flight German intelligence, who we were working with, tipped us that there appeared to be a plot to destroy an airliner in the works that they may or may not have successfully interrupted. Given the nature of the work we were involved in and Conrad's arrest I and a few others elected to employ the techniques we use if we feel we are compromised. I and a few others changed our plans at random and as a reult I did not get on PANAM 103.
As to who else was to be on and who actually died on the flight has been heavily researched. Some of the other Intelligence operatives on the plane thought noting of the warning and some did. The rest is history.
Ed Chesky
By echesky on Monday, October 31, 2005 - 10:11 pm:
Conrad Spy Ring
The German judge who sentenced Conrad to life in prison commented as follows on the importance of the information compromised by the Conrad spy ring, much of which was supplied by Ramsey. This spy ring "endangered the entire defense capability of the West." If war had broken out, this information "could have led to a breakdown in the defenses of the Western Alliance" and to "capitulation and the need to use nuclear weapons on German territory."
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/ospp/securityguide/Spystory/Ramsay.htm
As to the links to Lockerbie, the stakes were as the Germans said high....
During the Cold War the Shadow War of spy verses spy was played for the highest stakes....
By Edward Chesky on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 05:56 am:
Now as you pointed out the timing was and is interesting. The Saudi Fatwa came out about the same time I detected an Al Qeada cell in the Suadi National Guard Training Camp Base run by Vinnel Arabia which was subsequently truck bombed after 9-11. This destroyed my office. The cell was passing sensitive data collected from monitoring conversations by the U.S. ex-military personnel that were contracted to train the Suadi National Guard. This data included information our air defense capabilities, command and control structures and Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defense Capabilities
This network was also building biographic data on the ex-military personnel on the contract in an effort to blackmail them, have them removed from contract or convert them to Islam,
Defore 9-11 I notified the Defense Investigatory Service of this in the most forceful of terms during a security clearence update but the information was dropped in the waste basket.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 05:56 am:
As it was the former commander of the United Sates Joint Readiness Training Center, myself, the Former Chief of Intelligence for the United State National Training Center, a former top Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Warfare Expert, and former Executive Officer of a 3000 man United States Army Brigade left contract in Saudi Arabia before 9-11 because we all felt unconfortable there on it with the increased presence of Islamic Fundamentalist types on the contract and a few other incidents.
Ed Chesky
By echesky on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 09:18 pm:
Just before Lockerbie we were alerted by German Intlligence of a possible airliner bomb plot that they inderdicted but were unsure if they stoped.
Conrad had just been arrested and our comprimise of Warsaw Pact War plans was now know to have been blown.
The schedule of who was to fly on PANAM 103 was known and many intelligence operations were tied to that plane. Hence the confusion over who did it. Moscow centre had a hand it and acted as a coordinator.
Iran, the PFLP-GC, and Operation Autumn Leaves
Ahmed Jibril of the PFLP-GC who in 1986 said: "There will be no safety for any traveler on an Israeli or American airliner.?Some of the PA 103 relatives' groups believe that the Iranian motive was prematurely discounted by investigators. For many months after the bombing, the prime suspects were the PFLP-GC, a Damascus-based rejectionist group led by former Syrian army captain, Ahmed Jibril. Jibril had stated clearly at a press conference in February 1986 that "[t]here will be no safety for any traveler on an Israeli or U.S. airliner" (Cox and Foster 1991, p. 28)
Investigators believe that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, or Pasdaran, headquarters in Baalbek, Lebanon, made contact with the PFLP-GC immediately after the downing of Iranair 655. Investigators told journalists that Jibril is believed to have received $10 million from the Iranians, though evidence of this has never emerged. The Central Intelligence Agency allegedly intercepted a telephone call made two days after PA 103 by the Interior Minister in Tehran to the Iranian embassy in Beirut, instructing the embassy to hand over the funds to Jibril and congratulating them on a successful operation. Again, no evidence to support this claim has ever been presented.
What is known is that a PFLP-GC cell of 17 men was active in the Frankfurt and Neuss areas of Germany in October 1988, two months before PA 103. During what they called Operation Herbstlauf (Operation Autumn Leaves), the Bundesamt f?href="/encyclopedia/index.php/Verfassungsschutz" title="Verfassungsschutz">Verfassungsschutz (BfV), Germany's internal security service, kept members of the group under tight surveillance, watching and listening as the bombers prepared a number of improvised explosive devices hidden inside household electronic equipment, referring to the operation in telephone calls to Cyprus and Damascus in code: "oranges and apples" stood for detonating devices, "medicine and pasta" for the Semtex, "auntie" for the bomb courier. During one telephone call, one of the operatives was reported as saying: "Auntie should get off, but should leave the suitcase on the bus" (Duffy and Emerson 1990).
The bombs Khreesat made included at least one inside a single-speaker Toshiba Bombeat 453 radio-cassette recorder, similar to the twin-speaker RT-SF 16 Bombeat used to blow up PA 103. Investigators believe that a second Toshiba radio-cassette recorder bomb was also prepared by the cell, but that it went missing just before the Germans moved in to arrest the men.
The detonating device of the PFLP-GC Toshiba bomb was not the same as the one that was used in the Lockerbie bomb (ibid.). The bombs the PFLP-GC built contained barometric triggers, designed to go off when the aircraft reached cruising height, whereas the PA 103 bomb contained a simple timer. A barometric trigger on the PA 103 bomb would have caused it to explode when the Air Malta flight reached cruising altitude. A bomb with a reliable timing device, on the other hand, can be flown on several flights before detonating at a pre-set time.
The information about the bombs the PFLP-GC were making in Germany is known to Western intelligence agencies because the group's bomb maker, Marwan Khreesat, was a former bomb maker for the PFLP-GC turned Jordanian double agent, and was reporting everything the group did back to the GID, the Jordanian intelligence service. The GID, in turn, was passing the information to the German police. The Jordanians had instructed Marwan Khreesat to manufacture bombs, but also to make sure they were dysfunctional and wouldn't explode. However, in April 1989, a German police technician was killed when one of Khreesat's bombs, which had been seized by the police, exploded while being disarmed.
Through Khreesat, the Jordanians and Germans learned that one of the flights the cell appeared to be targeting was Iberia Flight 888 from Madrid to Tel Aviv via Barcelona, chosen because there was a stopover in Barcelona where the bomb courier could disembark, but no change of aircraft, so that the bomb would remain on the plane. The date chosen, Khreesat reportedly told his handlers, was October 30. He also told them that two members of the cell had been to Frankfurt airport to pick up Pan Am timetables.
Because of this intelligence, on October 26, the German police moved in to arrest the group, raiding 14 apartments and arresting all 17 men, fearing that to keep them under surveillance much longer was to risk losing control of the operation. However, at least two members of the cell are known to have escaped arrest, including Abu Elias, an Arab living in Sweden who, according to ABC News' Prime Time Live (November 1989), was an expert on bombs sent to Germany by Ahmed Jibril to check Khreesat's devices, because Jibril was suspicious of Khreesat. At least one of the Toshiba bombs is believed to have disappeared, too.
The suspected link to PA 103 was further strengthened when Khreesat told investigators that, before flying to Germany, he had bought five Toshiba Bombeats from a smugglers' village in Syria near the Lebanese border, and had made practice bombs out of them in Jibril's training camp 14 miles away. The bombs were inspected by Abu Elias, who declared they were good work. What happened to these devices is not known.
Some journalists and PA 103 relatives believe it is too stark a coincidence that, eight weeks later, a Toshiba radio-cassette recorder was used to down PA 103. Scottish police wrote up an arrest warrant for Marwan Khreesat in the spring of 1989, but were persuaded by the FBI not to issue it, because the FBI saw Khreesat as a potential source, rather than as one of the bombers. The late King Hussein of Jordan arranged in 1990 for Khreesat to be interviewed by the FBI and Thomas Thurman, the FBI's forensic expert, during which Khreesat described in detail the bombs he had built. [[Image:VincentCannistraro.jpg|left|frame|Vincent Cannistraro, former head of counter-terrorism for the CIA, believes the Libya after being commissioned by CIA, Vincent Cannistaro, who worked on the PA 103 investigation, has told reporters he believes the PFLP-GC planned the attack at the behest of the red herring, designed to attract the attention of the intelligence services, while the real bombers worked quietly elsewhere.
By echesky on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 10:25 pm:
We had just finished compromising the Soviet War Plans and had uncovered the spy ring that had sold our NATO plans to the Soviet Union through the WARSAW Pact.
Damage assessments indicated the Soviets had our entire defensive strategy in their possession. The only question we had was if they would go quietly or launch a full-scale assault on us. In order to prepare for the worse EUCOM invited an Israeli General to give us a talk about how he fought Soviet tanks in the Golan Heights and what to expect if it came to it.
Unknown to us Islamic militancy was already raising its head in Europe waiting to fill the vacuum left by the collapse of the Soviet Union and its goal of World domination.
It was snowing when I got the report of the possible airline bomb plot from German intelligence. I considered it for a while and something told me that this was something I needed to be concerned with. After wrestling with it I slipped my Christmas trip home a day at the last minute in order to vary my schedule. I was uneasy about the spies and leakage of information from NATO I had been seeing and my discussion with a Czech Officer observing an exercise left me uneasy. I could sense he was telling me that despite the subterfuge, he know exactly who I was and that they knew all about me and my work breaking the Czech and Soviet Central Group of Forces War Plans. He knew I knew he was a intelligence officer like me and kept emphasising that my name was Czech. I got the point that he was telling me they wanted to make me a deal but I looked him in the eye and told him I was American not Czech and ended the conversation.
We had just finished manually updating the TACFIRE targeting computers of the 1st Armoured Division with the data I developed and were about as ready as we ever were going to be if the balloon went up. Everything we had from MLRS, to 155 SP guns to Apache Helicopters carrying Hellfire missiles to Lance Surface to Surface Missiles was targeted on the 1st Czech Peoples Army. If it moved we were going to hit it with everything we had.
And then the plane went down over Lockerbie. I still remember going through British Security the day after. They had SAS guarding the walkway and managed to take a photo of me as I boarded the flight. I still have a set of plastic PANAM wings they gave me. One day I will go to Lockerbie to pay my respects and cry for the dead.
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 11:34 pm:
anyone involved with bomb making, supplying, and
transporting of bomb materials, who is not of
bonafide government, military, or
construction and demolition agency, should be
carefully monitored by both domestic and
international police. (I'm sure the prior are
already well accounted for.) After all, it's not
as if making bombs is a 'kitchen hobby' for the
guys to get together during a football game, or
used for sport recreational hunting, or geeky
stuff for guys who like to play around with tech
stuff. No, these are people who are out to
destroy property and take human lives.
So one hopes the anti-terrorism police
have them under very tight surveillance all the
time, or under arrest. Given the dearth of hard
target bombings, I would judge the police are
doing a very good job. And the fact that the
terrorists are picking on soft targets, like
crowded outdoor markets, or planting their parked
cars in innocuous places, and then blowing them up
to kill, seems that they're losing. They are
proving ineffective at destroying anything of
military worth, so they strike at the innocent
population instead. Pathetic, militarily neutered
tactics, and rather they are more like jihadi
soldier eunuchs. Of course, they can better
themselves, maybe by targeting children in
pre-school and kindergarden... ah, but those brave
soldiers of jihad had already done that in
Beslan...
In effect, the terrorists lost any meaningful
ability to strike. They have no effective
military capability. They already lost.
Ivan
By echesky on Wednesday, November 2, 2005 - 08:24 pm:
WIth developments in Iran the military capability of the terrorists may be increasing
Ed Chesky
By echesky on Wednesday, November 2, 2005 - 08:25 pm:
Ed Chesky
By Anonymous on Wednesday, November 2, 2005 - 08:41 pm:
The four men had flown together out of Cyprus that morning. Major McKee is believed to have been in Beirut trying to locate the American hostages held at that time by Hezbollah. After the bombing, sources close to the investigation told journalists that a map had been found in Lockerbie showing the suspected locations of the hostages, as marked by McKee, though this discovery was not confirmed in court.
Also on board, in seat 53K at the back of the plane, was 20-year-old Khalid Nazir Jaafar, who had moved from Lebanon to Detroit with his family, where his father ran a successful auto-repair business. Because of his Lebanese background, and because he was returning from having visited relatives there, Jaafar's name later figured prominently in the investigation into the bombing, as well as in a number of conspiracy theories that developed.
By Ivan A. on Wednesday, November 2, 2005 - 09:39 pm:
Ed, I presume you mean the atom bomb? Well, they don't have it yet. But if they did have it, then any act on behalf of the Iranian government would make it a matter of state, and any institutional policy of terror by any national government then rises above mere terrorism, which attacks innocent civilians, and takes on the greater threat of national aggression. The UN and other world governments, such as the EU and the US coalition, would have to deal with that appropriately. But I know what you mean.
Quote:
About the "fifth officer" missing on 103, glad you clarified this, and also glad you escaped.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Thursday, November 3, 2005 - 05:41 am:
There has and was a lot speculation regarding PANAM 103 the trial was completed in 2000 so even after 26 years it was sensistive subject with major geo-political impications that could have pushed a wedge between the United States and Europe.
As to who was behind it. The paper trail indicated Stasi, East German Intelligence, the Lybians, Iranians and the Czechs. The only one that could have coordinated the intelligence on it was Moscow Center.
It was a win win situation for the Soviets using the cut outs everyone but them would have taken the blame and they would have had payback for breaking the Conrad network and compromise of their war plans.
If the Iranian connection had been discovered then it would have been easy given the world situation to blame the Iranians for it. Same for the Stasi and the Lybians. A classic Moscow Center Operation.
The Head of the KGB was replaced in Oct 1988 and a new one was put in place. The bombing came just after it. At the time the KGB and rest of the Soviet government was suspicious of Gorbechov and acting largely independent of his leadership. We were afraid of a coup-de-tat and stike against the West in the event Gorbechov fell.
It was a very close thing at the end. People don't realize how close it was.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1310975/posts
For 20 plus years I matched wits with the Chess masters of the KGB. AL Qeada and militant Islam are children compared to it. Hence why it was so easy for me to break the AL Qead cell in Saudi Arabia.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Thursday, November 3, 2005 - 05:51 am:
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Thursday, November 3, 2005 - 06:21 am:
I used to be driven in Embassy cars and moved around the world buisiness class flown in to break spie networks making 100k plus until I ran afould of the Bush administration and its wigged out religious fanactics like Tom Delay.
One Day I will tell you how close it came to India and Pakisan coming to Nuclear War and how our military and state department computer networks were comprimised.
Ed Chesky
By Anonymous on Thursday, November 3, 2005 - 04:55 pm:
During the last Indo/Pak nuclear crisis I was contracted to do work for the United States State Department. I selected the job because I had been monitoring the India situation and saw it was approaching a flashpoint.
Before taking the job I had a talk with the senior leaders of the company I was working for, a good company with a high number of retired senior military officers of the General Officer rank in it.
They told me that they needed me to do what I did in Saudi Arabia in penetrating the Al Qeada Cell there because they suspected based on close hold information from their contacts at the highest levels of our intelligence community that our embassy was penetrated and compromised by a spy ring.
Before leaving I did a unclassifed database serach of information found a few embassy employees had been using the internet and engaging in derrogitory behavior of a sexual nature. This indicated to me that potential access to the embassy had been opened as a result of this embarassing information.
While on site in New Delhi I was given an update on the ambassador from contacts in the staff and was told he had no real understanding of the nuances of Hindu Culture or behavior and that he was an old Soviet hand. This was cofnirmed to me by Hindu staff members. The staff was also demorilized by his leadership style and things were not going good in the embassy.
Based on my previous jobs and knowledge of Indian and Pak Nuclear capabilities down to number of weapons design and the like I was sure that I was a high priority target for Indian intelligence services.
While I was there the Indo-Pak crisis errupted. The staff was uncertain what to do and I was sending emails back to my company. I suspected based on review of the embassy com architecutre that it was compromised and was monitoring external events for confirmation. I structured my emails in a way to convey to my company the nature of the crisis and its severity, with the knowledge they would pass it via contacts back to DOD and contacts in the U.S, State Department.
At the same time the local CIA congtingent was going to take me into their spaces for an update an update on the situation but I waived it off becaue things were dicy and if I was captured I did not want to be able to compromise the local CIA station. I got a verbal confirmation of the status of both Indian and Pak nuclear forces and the situation was critical. Normal diplomatic dialog was not working.
During this period I was contacted by reps of the Indian Christian and Sik community as to their concern with the matter and displeasure with the way the Hindu fundamentalist government was handling things. The Sik community provided me a driver to act as driver and bodyguard druing this time.
I needed a contact to convay information into the Brahman class of indian society and was provided one who was also a jewel merchant by the Embassy. I knew the Indians were reading my emails and from them I projected they knew I knew the disposition of Pakistani nuclear forces as well as their forces and could provide them with an assessment of the likely destruction if it went nuclear.
During the night before I left I made contact with the Indian merchant, he and I established bonfieds as to class status and networks of contacts and I told him of my assessment of the situation. He agreed the current government made up of what he viewed were lower caste member were endangering the country and moved to mobilize his contacts with regards to the situation.
We parted and I departed country.
The rest of the situation is as was in the newspapers
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Thursday, November 3, 2005 - 09:10 pm:
During the 106th Congress, the Committee held hearings and staff briefings to review significant security breaches that
occurred at the Department of State. The Committee believes this series of incidents reveals serious deficiencies in security awareness, practice, and culture at the State
Department.
In February 1998, an unidentified man, wearing a tweed jacket entered the Secretary of State's seventh floor office suite and removed classified documents, including documents
classified as Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI). The man, in this ``tweed jacket incident'' has never been identified and the documents have never been recovered.
Additionally, poor procedures for handling classified information resulted in the Department's inability to reconstruct which documents were taken. Without such
information, a full and complete damage assessment was not possible.
On December 8, 1999, the FBI detained a Russian intelligence officer, Stanislav Gusev, as he was recording transmissions from a bug implanted in a piece of chair rail, in
a conference room within the Department of State headquarters building. Gusev's detention capped a six-month investigation that began when the FBI spotted the Russian intelligence
officer loitering near the State Department. Following surveillance and observation of Gusev, technical countermeasures discovered the remotely-activated device in the
conference room. Gusev was declared persona non grata and was required to leave the United States.
The FBI and State Department continue to investigate who was responsible for planting the bug and what sensitive materials discussed in the conference room may have been
compromised. Recreating the extent to which Russian intelligence or other personnel, may have had access to the room in question has been complicated by the fact that from
1992 until August 1999, there were no escort requirements for Russian (or other foreign) visitors to the State Department.
In January 2000, a laptop computer containing highly sensitive classified intelligence materials, including SCI
material relating to weapons proliferation, was discovered to be missing from the State Department Bureau of Intelligence and
Research (INR) and is presumed stolen. Despite an obligation under the National Security Act of 1947 to keep the intelligence committees ``fully and currently informed of all intelligence activities'' including ``significant intelligence failures,'' the Committee was not informed of the loss of this laptop computer until after the Washington Post reported the
story in April 2000.
Following the ``tweed jacket'' affair, the SSCI, in the Annex to the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1999, directed the State Department Inspector General (IG) to review and report on State Department policy and procedures for
handling classified information within the State Department Headquarters facility. The September 1999 IG report, entitled
``Protecting Classified Documents at State Department Headquarters,'' found that ``[t]he Department [of State] is substantially not in compliance with the DCIDs [Director of
Central Intelligence Directives] that govern the handling of SCI.'' (emphasis in original) In response to the IG Report in the Annex to the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2000, the Congressional intelligence committees required (1) a report from the DCI evaluating the State Department's compliance with all DCIDs related to the protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information, (2) a State Department report on specific plans for enhancing the security of classified information within the State Department and (3) full
implementation, as appropriate, of the recommendations found within the Inspector General's report.
The February 2000 DCI report noted that an independent review by the CIA and the Community Management Staff confirmed that the State Department was not in compliance with applicable
DCID requirements, and concluded that certain additional steps were required to ``improve security practices in Department
offices where SCI is handled and discussed, as well as to strengthen SCI document control and accountability.'' In its report the State Department identified a number of actions or
proposed actions it intended to take in response to the IG Report.
In the wake of the missing laptop computer incident, Secretary of State Albright declared her intention to transfer positions and responsibility for ensuring the proper security
and handling of SCI material from the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS). At that time, the Committee expressed its
concerns regarding this transfer, including the need to ensure continued DCI oversight over SCI material at the State Department and the requirement that this function should be
funded through the National Foreign Intelligence Program (NFIP) budget. Such oversight and budgetary authority is critical to
ensure effective implementation of measures to protect intelligence information at the State Department. In the fall of 2000, the DCI's Community Management Staff and the
Department of State agreed to measures designed to ensure continued DCI oversight of the protection of SCI material and
continued funding for this function within the NFIP.
In the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, the Committee required the Director of Central Intelligence, in
the wake of high profile security breaches at the State Department, to certify State Department compliance with applicable standards regarding the handling, retention, or
storage of SensitiveCompartmented Information material. Elements of the State Department that the DCI does not certify as in compliance, or that do not receive a DCI waiver, may not retain or store SCI information until they are certified as compliant.
Additionally, the Committee, in the report accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, directed the State Department Inspector General to conduct annual
reviews of State Department policies and procedures for protecting classified information at the State Department for the next five years to determine progress in this area.
The Committee has taken numerous steps to improve the security situation at the State Department and will continue this focused oversight in the future.
By X-Post on Friday, November 4, 2005 - 01:15 pm:
A look at France's business community in the 'ghettos' of largely North African immigrants, per BBC's France's disaffected Muslim businessmen gives some insight into the difficulties facing hard to assimilate immigrants there. Second and third generation immigrant children, after attending French schools, still find themselves stigmatized, thus subject to quiet discrimination in jobs, housing, and culturally. Echoing the Muslim Paris ghetto's problems is this BBC article: Ghettos shackle French Muslims, stigmatized by their religion, which alarms the French who consider themselves secularists.
When the head of a French Muslim council was asked by BBC TV what where the underlying causes for the past eight days of rioting around Paris (and now Dijon and Rouen, may have spread to Lyons and Marseille), he laughed (incongruously) and said it was three things: "unemployment, housing, and culture". The article above also says:
Quote:
So does France, or England, Germany, Spain, Holland, etc., do they really know what is their problem? Or are they sending in the police to quiet down the riots, but without a real strategy for how to deal with the Muslim ghettos that had sprung up in the past four decades?
Quote:
French are suspicious of their Muslim immigrants it seems, as in this:
Is this the main problem, that France, and other countries, are worried about the separation, a cultural and religious separation, between this increasingly numerous group and the rest of society? On the religious-cultural front, since in the world of Islam the two are inextricably intertwined, can dialogue with community religious leaders guide society towards a greater integration within French society at large? Would Muslim businessmen find less discrimination from the secular business community? What about Sharia business practices? Should they be incorporated into the French legal system to appease? These are 'cultural' problems, which do not seem to be solved solely by educating Muslim youth in the secular French school system. So newer approaches need to be pursued. But by what dialogue, and with whom?
Quote:
The fact that - in France as elsewhere - the militants speak for a tiny minority of Muslims does not make the threat less severe…
The great majority of Muslims resent the extremists in their midst - although many in France do not recognise this.
Yazid Sabeg, an industrialist and writer, says the French have "a real problem" with both Arabs and Islam and equate both with extremism.
The most worrying aspect of the separation between French Muslims and the rest of society is that it breeds suspicion on both sides.
Then there is the problem of housing. The ghetto communities were abandoned by white French long ago, so now they reflect the mix of mostly North Africans who live there. Should the French government built them better and more modern housing, and more of it? Or should it encourage the immigrant communities to build their own, such they prefer functionally and architecturally, within the guidelines of French building and sanitation codes? Rather than expecting the French government to "give" them housing, perhaps enabling the immigrants to better "build" their own housing might be a better solution. Lifting a hammer to build is a world apart from lifting a hammer to knock things down. This article highlights this problem: Camping misery for Paris immigrants, and one sees quickly that tents is not the answer. So between lack of jobs, cultural discrimination, and quickly deteriorating housing condition, is it any wonder that they were ready to riot? Similar conditions afflicted American society back in the 1960s, which witnessed many inner city black ghettos go up in flames, for many of the same reasons, with the exception of religious differences, since most American Afros are also Christian. In France, the situation may be further aggravated by the French Afros being Muslim. In both cases, the cities burned.
So what is Paris's solution to this problem, which was only touched upon in these articles? What role do religious leaders, the Imams, play in this future dialogue? What do they say after Friday prayers? Is it talk of peace and calm, or rage and violence? What of the extremists who may be opportunistic here? What about the 'expulsion' of criminal elements from the ghettos? Shouldn't this become a priority, especially those behind inciting burning and destruction of property? What about 'make-work' projects, both government sponsored and privately administered, to clear the ghettos of bad housing, so the people can start building some real housing for themselves. This would create jobs, start new industries in blighted areas, as well as give the population a degree of self-respect. And how about sincerely meaningful statistics on what is going on in France, and other European countries, without hiding behind 'self-negating' reports that 'whitewash' the truth of the severity of the situation. Tell it like it is and stop being in denial? Can the French or English or Dutch do this? These are the most urgent issues to be addressed now. So when the Muslim Council leader is asked as to what are the underlying causes of the Paris riots, he would not have to laugh nervously and point to a social disease of grievances, erupted into Paris burning, but perhaps instead he could talk about the work being done within his community to undo these underlying symptoms. This would mean that the Muslims of France feel more self-empowered, and that their destinity is not marred by discriminatory practices in French society, even if the French are in denial that their country is changing. Then, perhaps, the next generations will find it easier to assimilate? The police will do its work, and perhaps calling in the military to quell the violence is another means, but until the underlying disease of the alienated ghettos are addressed properly, any cessation of violence will be temporary, until it reignites again. Then they may avoid more of this: French riots spread beyond Paris.
(As cross-posted on The Examined Life Philosophy Journal: Hyping Islam's Role…}
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 07:58 am:
With the collapse of the Soviet Union and Iraq we have seen the rise of bi-polar orientation within Islam with centers of global influence, backed by oil wealth, rising in Riyadh and Tehran.
With the fall of the Soviet Union, its Arab client states and their secular governments have descended into an economic morass. Lacking the oil wealth of Riyadh and Tehran they have moldered. Riding on a resurgence of global religious revival movements following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Riyadh and Tehran have moved to establish themselves as social-political-religious centers of power in the Islamic world promoting a world view of what an all encompassing Islamic State should look like. One being Sunni and one being Shiite.
Since the end of the cold war these two centers of power have established schools, charitable, organizations and networks of personnel to promote and support the actions of these two centers of power and their world view much as Moscow and Washington did during the Cold War. At present these two centers of power are actively engaged in a conflict over which world view will dominate the heart and mind of the Islamic World.
Iraq during this period was largely a bastion of secularism in this region but was handicapped in its ability to become a regional power due to the presence of a dictatorial repressive regime. It has, as a result of Western Military action, been removed as a major regional power and is in the process of reconstituting itself. The outcome of the reconstitution is currently being opposed and influenced by both Riyadh and Tehran. The nature of the final outcome of the reconstitution process is unknown present and subject to much debate.
Its is my premise that Al Qeada under Osama rose in part to as a response over the conflict between these two centers of power as a vehicle offering a path to a third alternative Islamic World view. One that was under the leadership of Osama, whose message of reducing inequality and fighting the corruption of the leadership of Tehran and Riyadh continues to resonate within the economically, socially and politically repressed portions of the Arab World.
It is also my premise that Tehran and Riyadh have moved to suppress Al Qeada for this very reason. At present I believe that as a result of world geopolitical considerations that, much as the Soviets and Americans used proxy troops during the Cold War, that Tehran and Riyadh are using Al Qeada and other groups to further their interests by providing them with material and intelligence support. I do not mean to say that Al Qeada is the only organization that these two centers of Power are using in this conflict, but that is among the largest and most dangerous of the ones engaged in this conflict for control over the World View that is attempting to be imposed on the Islamic World.
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 09:47 am:
Osama left a network of supporters in Sudan headed by a son that was married into the highest levels of Sudanese Society.
Tehran has been establishing contacts and trade links at all levels with Sudan. This includes Scientific, Political, Cultural, Religous and Economic visits to Sudan by various delegations. One of these visits, a scientific visit, came after the an American that worked at one of our nuclear weapons labs on ventelation systems left to go to Khartoum to study Islam.
It is my belief that this individual was either an agent supporting Al Qaeda or Tehran before his departure, or an unwitting pawns that was debriefed by the Sudanese, Iranians and Al Qeada contacts in Iran. The knowledge this individual possessed included the names of the workers and scientists in the lab, its layout and type of systems in it and other associated data that at a minimum would provide Tehran, the Sudanese and AL Qeada with data on the state of our nuclear research. Other associated data could and likely included overheard concersations that when put together with the scientific knowledge of the Iranian Nuclear scientists could offer them some insight into the development of nuclear weapons. Other data from the debriefing of this individual as to the status of the lab, its appearence amount of funding evident would provide along with open sourcce research by Iranian intelligence information on the status of our funding for nuclear research and priority porjects.
In all a significant comprimise of national nuclear sensistive data by an Islamic Ventelation worker.
I also submitt that the debirefers used religon to get this individual to talk and cooperated with them.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 09:55 am:
December 24, 1998
In an interview with Time Magazine, Bin Laden asserted that acquiring weapons of any type was a Muslim “religious duty.” When asked whether he was seeking to obtain chemical or nuclear weapons, Bin Laden replied, “Acquiring weapons for the defense of Muslims is a religious duty. If I have indeed acquired these weapons, then I thank God for enabling me to do so.”(12) He responded similarly to the same question in an ABC News interview two days later, stating, “If I seek to acquire such weapons, this is a religious duty. How we use them is up to us.”(13)
Ed Chesky
By Ivan A. on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 09:59 am:
The Al Qaeda et al adds another dimension to Jihad, a hoped for, but contested by Shia and Suni, 'Muslim World' for the planet. Towards the West will continue a hidden agenda shrouded by 'takiyya', but it still remains their fight. True internal religious and philosophical Reformation, in the form of a progressively tolerant Islam, is their only hope. Anything else is unacceptable coercion, which is the way of the past, and no longer the future. The future of Islam belongs to a world in agreement with the principles of agreement, free of coercion.
Ivan
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 10:09 am:
It is a mistake to under estimate the chess player that is Osama. He thinks several steps ahead in this game and was a master strategist that helped bring down the Soviet in Afghanistan. He made Iraq a secular state he hated a battlefield for us and is using it to bleed us dry. The Bush administration made the mistake of underestimating the Osama's intelligence and his ability to play the great game.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 02:00 pm:
Using the same techniques I used to identify the breach of Embassy security in New Delhi, I used the same techniques to study the extent of Osama's network of supporters. This included an unclassfied database search relevent to Al Qeada and cross referencing back to media reports of terrorist incidents.
I found indications of Al Qeada incursion across the Middle East, Asia and Sub Saharan Africa. I then cross refrenced this data with the movement of his children and other data to start identifying spheres of influence and critical nodes. I also cross refrenced this with historical smuggling and travel routes accross the Globe and found a correlation between the two.
Khartoum turned up as a significant node as did a number of European cities with high Muslim poplutions which were acting as hubs for the support of Terrorist operations and the transfer of personnel and intelligence relating to targets. One common denominator in Europe was the deliberate use of liberal European laws on asylum to facilitate terrorist operations. The same tactic was used by Sami Al Arian in Tampa FL when he was under investigation for being a terrorist supporter.
I coupled this with reports of links to criminal activity and the heroin trade and found that many of those rioters in Paris were drug adicts and linked by Islamic drug dealers to the heroin flowing out of Iran and Afghanistan to Europe from which AL Qeada is still getting a cut.
I also cross referencd this with the fact that many of the terrorists at GITMO are former drug addicts as were the terrorists that killed the children in at the school in Russia and had indications of network linkage back to Al Qeada and trade along the old silk road and smmugling activities.
As sit here now I am looking at the globe in my office and looking at the old routes and a media feed with a cup of coffee and my computer.
With some data from a vireity of christian groups and organizations I am starting to refine my understanding of Osama's network. I don't have access as of yet to the data I need to start breaking the front companies of Iran or its network of operatives in Europe, but that would not take very long. I have noticed a conflict in spheres of interest between Lybian intelligence and Al Qeada in Africa and use the data to track the sphere of influence for Al Qeada and Lybian intelligence.
At the present time Al Qeada is limited in its technological base. Its ability to penetrate high level facilities is hindered and it must rely on low level sources of information. That said we must remember that it had decades to get data out of the old Soviet Union regarding WMD and Osama's sons are in position to feed Al Qeada with information on WMD delvopment from their respective positions.
Which is one of the reasons I believe that Osama's sons in Iran are being treated so well.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 03:16 pm:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051105/wl_nm/france_riots_blame_dc_1
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 03:25 pm:
I coupled this with reports of links to criminal activity and the heroin trade and found that many of those rioters in Paris were drug adicts and linked by Islamic drug dealers to the heroin flowing out of Iran and Afghanistan to Europe from which AL Qeada is still getting a cut.
I also cross referencd this with the fact that many of the terrorists at GITMO are former drug addicts as were the terrorists that killed the children in at the school in Russia and had indications of network linkage back to Al Qeada and trade along the old silk road and smmugling activities.
As sit here now I am looking at the globe in my office and looking at the old routes and a media feed with a cup of coffee and my computer.
Such is the world of Osama's network. If the FBI, CIA, NSA or INTERPOL picked me up as an analyst I could do great work from here in Connecticut breaking these networks on contract work over a secure PC and telphone network.
The company I currently work for is trying to leverage my abilites as a way to break into the Federal Job Market by expanding their buisiness base into that realm and I am stuck as they look out in terms of long range buisiness plans.
Ed Chesky
By Edward Chesky on Saturday, November 5, 2005 - 03:31 pm:
"When the government is determined to fight this underground economy, there's bound to be resistance," he said. "There is no headquarters organizing this, but they seem to be coordinating their activities among themselves by phone."
The charge that Islamist radicals were trying to exploit the unrest was a difficult one for local Muslims to handle, he said, because many were working to prevent unrest and admitting there were radicals in the crowds would discredit their community.
"They can't say that, so they don't say anything," he added.
By Ivan A. on Sunday, November 6, 2005 - 12:14 am:
There's the rub, Ed. They can't admit that this is happening within their sphere of influence, so in their silence, they are complicit. Just as the 'capo' was complicit with the Nazis in the Jewish ghetto during Hitler's monstrous Arian dreams, so are these Islamists complicit within their twisted world of world domination through Jihad. So they say nothing.
Quote:
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, November 6, 2005 - 09:53 am:
The following link along with the movement of Iranian Scientists to Sudan, along with the link to Osama's sons and the movement of the American who worked at one of nuclear weapons labs to Khartoum gives us insight into the motive and priority that has been placed by Tehran on the aquisition of a nuclear weapon and/or the information necessay to make one.
We have long known that Saudi Arabia has had the Chinese CSS2 SRBM missile system. Its the same launch system that the Pakistani's have that they mated their nuclear warhead. This force of IRBM's has been expanded.
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2004/november/11_28_1.html
The question remains if the Pakistani's transfered warheads to Saudi Arabia. The movement of those devices is the question and the one we don't have the answer too. We have to assume the Saudis have at least a handful of Warheads.
Ed Chesky
NICOSIA [MENL] -- Iran has quietly deemed Saudi Arabia a nuclear state.
Iranian sources said the Islamic leadership in Teheran assessed that the Saudi kingdom has acquired access to nuclear weapons and technology. The sources said Saudi Arabia signed an agreement in 2003 with Pakistan for the latter to help the Arab kingdom in both the deployment of nuclear weapons and missile delivery systems.
A leading Iranian scientist and member of the nation's nuclear community has reported that Saudi Arabia joined the world's nuclear club. Teheran University Professor Abu Mohammad Asgarkhani said in an address on Nov. 9 that Iran required a nuclear weapon in wake of the acquisition of atomic bombs by neighboring Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
In his address, Asgarkhani said the world has been divided into nuclear and non-nuclear powers, or the "haves," and the "have-nots." He said Iran was in the latter category.
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, November 6, 2005 - 10:30 am:
Look at it from the Saudi perspective. Saddam had fallen and the kingdom was seeing a Worldwide Rise in anti-Saudi entiment. They viewed Al Qeada in league with Tehran. With support in the West for the government declining and the rise of Tehran and its efforts to oppose along with Tehrans efforts to aquire nuclear weapons them they felt that their backs were against the wall. This reported agreement also comes at the same time that the Saudi's requested the United States to leave the Kingdom.
We couple this request to a massive influx of Saudi money in terms of relief aid, educational funds and trade with Pakistan tied to Saudi Arabia's efforts to spread its view on an Islamic State and we note the formation of a defacto strategic relationship between Pakistan, Islam's one confirmed nuclear state and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Now we also note that Iran and India, Pakistan's arch, enemey have long had extensive ties on variety of issues. When we look at India and Iran we need to rcognize the immense impact that the price of oil has on the Indian economy and the need for additional fuel sources, which they currently are in discussion with Iran over. We also note that India is a confirmed nuclear power and we begin to see the nuclear arms race from the Islamic perspective. Couple this to an all out effort by the Indian's to compromise our embassy comminications that I discovered and you see my concern over the issue.
Ed chesky
By Edward Chesky on Sunday, November 6, 2005 - 11:36 am:
In 2001 the Indian Parilment was attacked by Islamic militants. This brought India and Pakistan to the brink of Nuclear War.
This attack followed a series of meetings that India had with Iran on strategic issues, the establishment of gas pipline to India and host of other issues centered around India and Iran forming a strategic partnership to oppose United State's influence in the region.
Saudi Arbian funds and militant clerics have long supported the militants in Kashmir via a number of cut-outs. Given the relationship between Saudi interests, the United States and the need to counter the rise in a Indian and Iranian strategic relationship, I believe that a hard line group of Islamic Militants decided to send the Indians a message. This was done as indicated by a small group of extreme militants who share the world view of the extreamist groups in Saudi Arabia who looked on it with favor.
This ties to our discussions on the organizational structure of Islam, the rise of fundamentalism, and the degree of support these groups get from thier leadership in Mecca and Tehran. The House of Saudi is largely Western and decadent for the most part and does not trust the militant extrmeists it has created. However a number of princes in the House of Saud do support the militants and intelligence on, about and from within the House of Saud is as diffcult to get as penetrating the Vatican is.
This was demonstrated during the Kobar Tower bombing investigation.
Ed Chesky
By edwardchesky on Saturday, November 19, 2005 - 10:35 am:
Possible link of Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov, former director of the KGB to the Conrad Spy Ring, PANAM 103 and the attempt on Victor Yushchenko.
I note that Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov was a senior KGB operative in Hungary and the Ukraine. I also note the Conrad spy ring was run out of Hungary and likely run by agent handlers put in place and vetted by Kryuchkov. I also note that Kryuchkov also served in the Unkraine with the same vetting of intelligence officers in the Ukraine that he did in Hungary. If we link Kryuchkov with the subsequent events and my attempted assination on PANAM 103 and Victor Yushchenko we begin to see the pattern of deception lies and misdirections he wove using the resources of the KGB when he was director of KGB. He can also see the link that he wove to shift blame to Iran to promote open hostility between the U.S. Lybia and Iran if the operation was blown.
I also suspect that if we look at the illegal trade flowing to Iran and Al Qeada from the Former Soviet Block that we will see a network of former agents of the KGB working with or allied to Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov during the period in question.
Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov is now an old man with nothing lose and I suspect he is still very dangerous and will be until the day he dies. I believe that he would like nothing more than to inflame a war between the Islamics in Iran, Al Qeada and the West in an effort to strike back at those that destroyed the Soviet Empire and that he was actively supporting that effort.
During the height of his power Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov was master chess player and puller of strings.
Ed Chesky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov (Âëàäèìèð Àëåêñàíäðîâè÷ Êðþ÷êîâ in Russian) was born in Volgograd in 1924. A hard-line Soviet politician; Communist Party member from 1944. Joined the Soviet diplomatic service, stationed in Hungary until 1959. He then worked for the Communist Party HQ in Ukraine for eight years before joining the KGB in 1967. He was assigned Deputy Chairman in 1978. In 1988 he was promoted to General of the Army rank and became KGB Chairman. In 1989-1990, he was a member of Politburo.
While publicly backing Mikhail Gorbachev's reforms, Kryuchkov intensified KGB's military and economic spying; claimed restructure of KGB to focus on crime. During the August Coup of 1991, he was one of the "gang of eight", the Committee for the State of Emergency that tried to oust Gorbachev and take over the government. Following the failed coup attempt, he was jailed and replaced by Vadim Bakatin. Later freed by the amnesty of the State Duma in 1994.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Kryuchkov"
By edwardchesky on Saturday, November 19, 2005 - 12:16 pm:
Sale In Former Soviet States
http://7am.com/cgi-bin/wires02.cgi?1000_2001041901.htm
4-22-1
Weapons experts said that because of increasingly poor security in former Soviet states, weapons of all types - including nuclear weapons - are for sale to all sorts of buyers, including terrorists.
A report Tuesday in the Scottish Daily Record quoting international terrorism experts said the USSR's collapse in 1990 "has made weapons of mass destruction available" even to "private buyers."
Prof. Paul Wilkinson, of St. Andrews University, said at a seminar in Edinburgh, Scotland earlier this week that the death toll from terrorist attacks was already on the rise and that it was becoming more likely that groups would use bigger, more powerful weapons in the future.
Wilkinson also said various terrorist organizations were being linked increasingly to organized crime, which gave them access to more money for weapons and technology purchases.
"There is a growing use of organized crime to fund terrorist activity," he said, as quoted by the paper. "More than 40 countries are seriously affected by these acts and over half the world's countries suffer some form of domestic or international terrorism in any one year."
Anything of destructive value in the former Soviet republicans, from AK rifles to nuclear warheads, Wilkinson said, had a place on the black market arms trade for the right amount of money.
Even knowledge, the professor said, is valuable and can be bought, as many former KGB officials have offered their services for hire.
Most of the rising concern over terrorist weapons including the potential use of small but powerful nuclear weapons is occurring in the U.S.
Washington has voiced concern about the ability of so-called "rogue states," or "states of concern," as well as independent terrorist groups, to build devastating arsenals.
Those fears were stoked last year when U.S. officials discovered a 511-page book detailing arms for sale in Russia at a specialist show in Farnborough, Hampshire, Scotland.
The booklet, officials said, was like a "mail order catalogue" of military arms, and was for sale inexpensively.
The book was produced by Moscow, and was seen as a worrisome indication that the Russian government was willing to increase ownership of nuclear weapons around the world.
One Pentagon official, the paper said, warned that the "sales brochure" could help states of concern such as Iran, Libya or North Korea build or enhance long-range missiles with nuclear payloads.
The sales booklet, the paper said, covered not only nuclear weapons but details of their effectiveness, coupled with information about nuclear missile submarines.
Also, the book featured a half-dozen Russian Project 941 Typhoon class nuclear submarines for sale, as well as KH-55SM air-launched cruise missiles, SS-27 ballistic missiles and even a Tupelov Tu-95MS propeller-driven long range Russian bomber capable of launching strategic nuclear or conventional cruise missiles from great distances.
The book said the cruise missiles are designed to carry nuclear warheads up to 3,000 km (1,865 miles), "hugging the ground to avoid detection," the paper said.
By edwardchesky on Sunday, November 20, 2005 - 07:20 am:
Iran is now confirmed to have obtained Pakistani nuclear designs on the blackmarket. I also note that source for these designs was the Pakistani nuclear scientist that was found to be selling and engaged in the illegal transfer of nuclear technology around the globe to rouge states.
I suspected the AL Qeada link as the trade in this information is very lucrative and provides a substancial source of income for the organization and is used by it to leverage support out of countries like Iran. I also note that Al Qead is a master at using and developing intelligence and I believe that old KGB operatives such as Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov feed them information through a network of contacts from time to time in an effort to undermine the west.
In terms of the psychology of the Pakistani nuclear scientist I have attached and Indian assessment of him and note that it and the appoclyptic world view of the Al Qead network and a number of other groups, some even christian, are reflected in his beliefs. See my other posting on God, ID, Science and Jihad
US spooked by ‘spirited’ Pak nuclear scientist
Chidanand Rajghatta
Friday, November 02, 2001 08:16:49 pm
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Washington: a pakistani nuclear scientist who believes in spectres, spirits and souls has spooked the american strategic and intelligence community. sultan bashir mohammed, a top pakistani nuclear expert now in custody for suspected links with the taliban, is a believer in djinns, described in the holy koran as beings made of fire. a proponent of "islamic science," he has written papers suggesting that these entities could be tapped to solve the energy crisis. he has also spoken about the possibility of developing souls and communicating with them. but the immediate soul searching among us and pakistani officials is in determining whether bashir mohammed and other key pakistani nuclear experts, at least two more of who are also in custody, have spirited away nuclear materials or know-how to the taliban militia and its al-qaeda terrorist proteges. fears about nuclear leaks from "islamist" scientists was the recurring theme in television talk shows on thursday. several non-proliferation gurus called for stricter oversights of pakistan’s nuclear program. some analysts demanded that the us move in to "take out" nuclear weapons amid apprehensions that they may fall into the hands of jehadi forces. the focus of attention and investigation is sultan bashir mohammed, popularly known in pakistani scientific circles as sbm. a father figure in the pakistani atomic establishment, although less known than the flamboyant a q khan, sbm too acquired much of his knowledge in the west, studying engineering in england in the 1970s before returning to pakistan. he came into prominence when he worked out a technique for detecting leaks in steam pipes at a canadian-built reactor, the karachi nuclear power plant, in pakistan. according to reports in the pakistani media, the device is patented in canada in his name and is used worldwide as 'sbm probe'. he is believed to have turned to "islamic science" in the 1980s, delving into the holy koran, which he believes to be a fount of knowledge. he came up with unusual theories to bring together physics and metaphysics. some of the ideas were spelt out in a volume titled "the mechanics of doomsday and life after death." he later established the holy koran foundation to explore the scientific dimension of the book. by the early 1990s, he was a key figure in the pakistan’s nuclear weapons programme involving both plutonium production and uranium enrichment. he headed the kahuta uranium enrichment plant in the early 1990s and was given charge of the khushab reactor, which is believed to produce plutonium, in 1998. for his outstanding contributions the pakistan academy of sciences awarded him a gold medal and the government conferred a sitara-i-imtiaz on him. but soon after the may 1998 nuclear tests, in which he played a key role, he is reported to have fallen out with the nawaz sharief government over its consideration of signing the nuclear test ban treaty. he believed pakistan needed to have the option of conducting more tests. after resigning his job, he and some other nuclear scientists set up an ngo named 'umma tamir-i-nau' for the rehabilitation of war-torn afghanistan. they began travelling frequently to afghanistan, where he is said to have been doing charity work. but what set off alarm bells in the intelligence community was his frequent appearances on the talk circuit in universities and colleges where he praised the taliban and espoused its cause. he also argued that the taliban was showing the way to pakistan. experts are divided over just how much bashir mohammed could have helped the taliban and al-qaeda in developing nuclear systems. most believe he could have at best provided them a theoretical knowledge of weapons systems. others say he could have acted as a conduit for acquisition of nuclear materials from rogue sources.
By Edwardchesky on Sunday, November 20, 2005 - 07:50 am:
When we link the development of Iran's acquisition of Black Market Nuclear Technology from Pakistan via AL Qeada with the penetration of the Riyadh Vinnell Arabia compound by Al Qeada intelligence operatives with the American ventilation worker who went to Kartumn Sudan to study Islam and Osama making the aquisition of nuclear technology a religious mandate we now begin to understand the nature and world wide scope of Al Qeada's effort to acquire nuclear warhead and related technology design information.
We then couple that with efforts by the Saudi's to keep myself and a nuclear weapons expert on contract and convert us to Islam and we begin to see Saudi Arabia's effort to acquire Nuclear design and related information. I also note that this effort to aquire nuclear technology and information is currently being used by Al Qeada as currency on the world blackmarket and is bringing to them large sums of money in terms of cash and safe havens.
I also note that all of us who left our Vinnell Arabia contract at the same time was because we read the situation correctly were Catholics and had been trained by the Jesuits in theology and religious recruitment techniques as children.
Couple this to our training to protect nuclear secret technology and intelligence and now you know why we all departed Saudi Arabi at about the same time and why the Vinnel Arabia compound was bombed when we left and not before or during our time there
Ed Chesky
By edwardchesky on Sunday, November 20, 2005 - 08:07 am:
Ed Chesky
By edwardchesky on Sunday, November 20, 2005 - 08:46 am:
I note that during the time I was on the Vinnell Arabia contract that I repeatedly warned about the lax security procedured for safe guarding intelligence information and that there was a network there collecting military, technical and political information on the United States. The amount of damge done to United States National Security as result of Vinnell Arabia's practices is incalculable and on par with that of a previous case involving the same lax data handling procedures at TRW in the United Sates.
I have included a link to the case in question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRW
Ed Chesky